I thought you were just defining yourself as an ethical consequentialist?You already know where it is. We have covered it ad nauseam.
I thought you were just defining yourself as an ethical consequentialist?You already know where it is. We have covered it ad nauseam.
Not once did I use that phrase. That is the phrase that you used.I thought you were just defining yourself as an ethical consequentialist?
Yes, obviously.Not once did I use that phrase. That is the phrase that you used.
Back to my position, which you apparently disagree with.Yes, obviously.
Illiteracy: subjective used as objective. Failure to capitalize the first letter of a sentence.you are not bright.
You don't seem to know what a moral is. You keep thinking an event is a moral. Now you try to claim a moral is unimportant?!?I am talking about morality and what is truly relevant when discussing morality.

An event it not a moral.Back to my position, which you apparently disagree with.
Given the impact on the victim, can you tell me a scenario where female genital mutation is moral?
Derp.You don't seem to know what a moral is.
Double derp.You keep thinking an event is a moral. Now you try to claim a moral is unimportant?!?
Triple derp.That's just saying that YOU are unimportant!![]()
Morality isn't an event.An event it not a moral.
morals are a set of attitudes and behaviors that facilitate voluntary, cooperative, and mutually beneficial relationships.You don't seem to know what a moral is. You keep thinking an event is a moral. Now you try to claim a moral is unimportant?!?
That's just saying that YOU are unimportant!![]()

I agree with that.morals are a set of attitudes and behaviors that facilitate voluntary, cooperative, and mutually beneficial relationships.
this is breakthrough progress.I agree with that.
Trying to deny what you are won't work.Derp.
Double derp.
Triple derp.
I coherent babbling.
Ignored.
Not really. This was my definition all along, from my very first post.this is breakthrough progress.
Therefore, a gang member figures it is moral to attack a rival gang because it provides a beneficial relationship to his own gang.morals are a set of attitudes and behaviors that facilitate voluntary, cooperative, and mutually beneficial relationships.
The people most actively trying to suppress female genital mutilation are human rights and social justice groups, which typically attract staff and volunteers from a lefty-social justice worldviewYes, I mentioned it earlier, but people who are religious tend to believe that morals come from their sky wizard.
Between the moral relativists and the religious people, that covers the majority of everyone because people tend to look at morality the wrong way. They look at the behavior of the person, not the impact of the behavior.
Don't try to deny your being dumbTrying to deny what you are won't work.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
no. attacking is not within the set of pro social behaviors.Therefore, a gang member figures it is moral to attack a rival gang because it provides a beneficial relationship to his own gang.
@Into the NightWhat is it specifically about the act of cutting off a teenage girl's clitoris that you find to be immoral?
no.The people most actively trying to suppress female genital mutilation are human rights and social justice groups, which typically attract staff and volunteers from a lefty-social justice worldview
I really don't think there are a measurable amount of MAGA morons working for social justice NGOs focused on Africa and the global south.