“Right-wing activist James O’Keefe charged with unlawful voting”

archives said:
None of which you can prove had any effect on anything
Click to expand...
9o8hk8.jpg
 
archives said:
And you still can’t document how all this fraud you claim is occurring widespread ever had any effect on an outcome of an election
Click to expand...
Now you've moved to the invincible ignorance stage of things. Nothing I can present will change your position, which is based on nothing other than you demand I prove ever more than I have.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
More like they committed a crime to show how fraudulent voting in Minnesota can be and how easy it is to perpetrate. Their criminal actions don't change that the system they exposed is completely bullshit and potentially, if not actually, rife with fraud.
Click to expand...
Dear fucking idiot

They were not allowed to vote


Fuck you very much
 
evince said:
Dear fucking idiot

They were not allowed to vote


Fuck you very much
Click to expand...
WRONG! They CHOSE not to vote. They were not denied the ability to vote. They were not turned away. In fact, if you listen to the woman standing behind the seated man, she explains how to ensure vouching for others works so they'll get to vote. All of that with ZERO ID. At no time did the poll workers attempt to verify who was standing in front of them.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
They gave a false address and were going to be allowed to vote. Worse, if you actually watch the video they then "vouch" for others--persons unknown and not verified--to allow them to vote. The whole system is massively ripe for fraud.
Click to expand...
And they could not fulfill the requirement to be allowed to bite dip shit

They were required to sign a binding affidavit to seal the deal

They didn’t sign that so they couldn’t vote


What would have happened to them if they signed that affidavit?

More charges when they were found to be signing a false affidavit


Same thing that would have happened to anyone who tried to do this


Remember when this idiot went to Acorn dressed as a pimp?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
WRONG! They CHOSE not to vote. They were not denied the ability to vote. They were not turned away. In fact, if you listen to the woman standing behind the seated man, she explains how to ensure vouching for others works so they'll get to vote. All of that with ZERO ID. At no time did the poll workers attempt to verify who was standing in front of them.
Click to expand...
They chose not to do more crimes

So they couldn’t vote

Same as anyone who tried this idiot
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I saw several things exposed:

The poll worker had no clue who was actually voting there.

The voucher system is a complete sham and fraud.

The poll workers were more than willing to perpetuate that entire fraud.

The fraud was legalized meaning it would have gone undetected had they gone ahead and voted.
Click to expand...
Your brain is cult captured

So you don’t matter to the court proceedings
 
evince said:
And they could not fulfill the requirement to be allowed to bite dip shit

They were required to sign a binding affidavit to seal the deal

They didn’t sign that so they couldn’t vote


What would have happened to them if they signed that affidavit?

More charges when they were found to be signing a false affidavit


Same thing that would have happened to anyone who tried to do this


Remember when this idiot went to Acorn dressed as a pimp?
Click to expand...
They could have signed if their intention was to actually fraudulently vote. They then could have voted. There'd be no way to trace anything back to them afterwards so they'd have gotten away with it.

They obviously didn't intent to actually fraudulently vote but just expose how asinine Minnesota's voter system is.

There would have been no charges if they didn't expose what they were doing on social media. It was ONLY because they self admitted to it that it became a case.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Now you've moved to the invincible ignorance stage of things. Nothing I can present will change your position, which is based on nothing other than you demand I prove ever more than I have.
Click to expand...
How does them being prevented from furthering their fraud and getting charged with crimes prove a weakness in the system?


Your brain-case is full or orange shit soup
 
  • Haha
Reactions: QP!
evince said:
How does them being prevented from furthering their fraud and getting charged with crimes prove a weakness in the system?


Your brain-case is full or orange shit soup
Click to expand...
They weren't prevented. They chose not to carry through with actually voting which they were going to be allowed to do--if they chose to do so. The system didn't stop anything and even facilitated it.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
They could have signed if their intention was to actually fraudulently vote. They then could have voted. There'd be no way to trace anything back to them afterwards so they'd have gotten away with it.

They obviously didn't intent to actually fraudulently vote but just expose how asinine Minnesota's voter system is.

There would have been no charges if they didn't expose what they were doing on social media. It was ONLY because they self admitted to it that it became a case.
Click to expand...
The papers they signed would have done so idiot


They would have been filed and checked by the proper authorities

Prove that would not have happened

Yeah


You have to go there or shut the fuck up
 
T. A. Gardner said:
They weren't prevented. They chose not to carry through with actually voting which they were going to be allowed to do--if they chose to do so. The system didn't stop anything and even facilitated it.
Click to expand...
They chose not to compound their crime spree


They just would have have more charges placed against them

Now go wipe the shit off your face loser
 
T. A. Gardner said:
They weren't prevented. They chose not to carry through with actually voting which they were going to be allowed to do--if they chose to do so. The system didn't stop anything and even facilitated it.
Click to expand...
And been charged with more crimes


BTW

I hope every actual voter who’s name they used sues the fuck out of them for identity theft
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
evince said:
The papers they signed would have done so idiot
Click to expand...

The papers? They signed a form, so what?
evince said:
They would have been filed and checked by the proper authorities
Click to expand...

No, they wouldn't have. Do you really think somebody is going back and checking every signature? Against what are they checking? What's the standard?
evince said:
Prove that would not have happened
Click to expand...

The proof is that it has never happened. Even with mail-in ballots, the verification standards in most states are so lax that any ballot mailed in is counted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top