Can’t regulate guns! But you can regulate voting!

guns are still regulated. what are you bitching about now?
I suspect he is bitching about the fucking morons who continue to support the fucking moron in charge...although Jarod is probably not disposed to put that thought into words a fucking moron like you could understand.

I, on the other hand, am more than willing to indulge you.
 
I suspect he is bitching about the fucking morons who continue to support the fucking moron in charge...although Jarod is probably not disposed to put that thought into words a fucking moron like you could understand.

I, on the other hand, am more than willing to indulge you.
indulge me then
 
shall not be infringed

where is voting as a right in the Constitution?
The 15th amendment.

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

You kids are always claiming you love the Constitution, maybe someday you should actually read it.
 
The 15th amendment.

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

You kids are always claiming you love the Constitution, maybe someday you should actually read it.
on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Maybe you kids should read it better.
 
Trumppers be lookin!

So is voting.

And you have to be registered to vote.

Should you have to be registered to own a gun?
This is a formal logical fallacy called the Fallacy of Four Terms. It works like this and this is why it is fallacious.

To exercise your Right to vote, you have to register.
Owning a gun is a Right
Therefore, you need to register your gun to exercise your Right.

The fallacy is in transferring a Right from a person (voting) to an object (the gun). Then an additional qualifier is tossed in, registration. The result is the conclusion is not validated by the premise.

This is failed logic of the sort the Left regularly uses to justify taking something from you.

The actual case is both voting and owning a gun are rights. In both cases, you have to prove you are entitled to exercise that Right (eg., voter registration, or filling out an application and background check for the firearm). The exact form of "registration" varies between the two because they are two different things and treated appropriately due to those differences.
 
This is a formal logical fallacy called the Fallacy of Four Terms. It works like this and this is why it is fallacious.

To exercise your Right to vote, you have to register.
Owning a gun is a Right
Therefore, you need to register your gun to exercise your Right.

The fallacy is in transferring a Right from a person (voting) to an object (the gun). Then an additional qualifier is tossed in, registration. The result is the conclusion is not validated by the premise.

This is failed logic of the sort the Left regularly uses to justify taking something from you.

The actual case is both voting and owning a gun are rights. In both cases, you have to prove you are entitled to exercise that Right (eg., voter registration, or filling out an application and background check for the firearm). The exact form of "registration" varies between the two because they are two different things and treated appropriately due to those differences.
You must be registered to vote.

Why don't you have to be registered to own or use a gun?
 
You must be registered to vote.

Why don't you have to be registered to own or use a gun?
I explained that you retard. You--YOU--must register to vote. That is prove you are eligible. To buy a gun, YOU, must prove you are eligible to do so. That's what the background check is about.

You don't register to vote every time you actually vote. You don't do a background check every time you use your firearm.

You are conflating the firearm, a thing, object, you own, with the act of registering to vote. I don't register my ID to vote. That's the closest equivalent to your argument. Then in each case there is an inanimate object involved. This is where the logical fallacy starts.

You are perpetuating the fallacy of four terms. That is, the OP video is simply logically fallacious and therefore wrong.
 
Back
Top