'Blade Runner': philosophical implications in Ridley Scott's sci-fi classic

I've created a couple of threads long time ago on it. Here's an example.

Oh, that's a great thought experiment that gets right to the heart of personal identity.

Riker was split into two distinct individuals in TNG by the transporter. That is a real conundrum.
 
Replicant.
No, a replicant is not a biological race, but rather a manufactured, artificial species or type of synthetic humanoid.What is a Replicant?Artificial Beings: In science fiction franchises like Blade Runner and NieR Replicant, replicants are lab-grown, bioengineered lifeforms rather than natural humans or a distinct ethnic/biological race.Function over Identity: They are engineered by corporations or systems to serve specific purposes, such as slave labor or physical stand-ins, rather than evolving naturally through human lineages.Thematic Parallels: While not a race, the way society treats replicants often mirrors real-world systemic racism, prejudice, and the exploitation of marginalized labor classes (such as being targeted with slurs like "skin-job").
 
Blade Runner was unlike any sci fi movie I had seen to that point. It dropped all the cheese factor of most sci fi and produced a unique dark cyber-punk vibe with a smart and memorable story.
Admit it, you just got off on that blonde robot chic.

1787622517764.png
 
Says Hawkeye The Wise: From the dystopia of Olympia Wa

I have not been to Seattle since 2019......my last trip to Portland was a few years before that....and I once spent a lot of time in both cities.

I want to remember them before the fall.
 
As we were driving up FIVE relocating from Ft Huachuca as we pulled into town I literally said "BACK TO CIVILIZATION!"

May 2004.....years before the fall.
 
Back
Top