Everyone understands that Socialism is not Communism, right?

Democratic Socialism is an oxymoron. It is not possible to have a Socialist system and have it work with Democracy.
It can, bur by abandoning democracy. This is why this form of government is terrible. One one faction gains control, they keep it, and democracy collapses into an oligarchy or dictatorship.

Since a democracy has no constitution to limit what happens, this path is inevitable. It is also why there are currently no democracies on Earth.
 
Marxist Communism, presented as a step toward a stateless society is inherently flawed, due to its suggestion that social force is acceptable to meet an end, it fails to take into account human nature to keep power. The theory gets stalled at Communism, because it allows for authoritarianism.

A utopian idea of a Stateless form of existence is not inherently evil, however it is not possible via authoritarian pressure. That has been proven over and over again.

Marx was wrong about the idea that Communists would give up the excessive power the state is given. This cannot be forced, and Marx suggested force.

That does not mean a level of socialism, not focused on forcing statelessness is evil or even bad. In fact there are absolutely 0 examples of a successful Nation without some elements of socialism. It is actually necessary to prevent Corporatism. You people take an outdated idea that used Socialism as a phase necessary toward forcing statelessism, into an evil. In moderation elements of Socialism are necessary to maintain Democracy.

@Yakuda @T. A. Gardner @Lionfish
 
Marxist Communism, presented as a step toward a stateless society is inherently flawed, due to its suggestion that social force is acceptable to meet an end, it fails to take into account human nature to keep power. The theory gets stalled at Communism, because it allows for authoritarianism.

A utopian idea of a Stateless form of existence is not inherently evil, however it is not possible via authoritarian pressure. That has been proven over and over again.

Marx was wrong about the idea that Communists would give up the excessive power the state is given. This cannot be forced, and Marx suggested force.

That does not mean a level of socialism, not focused on forcing statelessness is evil or even bad. In fact there are absolutely 0 examples of a successful Nation without some elements of socialism. It is actually necessary to prevent Corporatism. You people take an outdated idea that used Socialism as a phase necessary toward forcing statelessism, into an evil. In moderation elements of Socialism are necessary to maintain Democracy.

@Yakuda @T. A. Gardner @Lionfish
1788796437364.png
 
Back
Top