Dershowitz says likely Chauvin conviction will be reversed thanx to Maxiine

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
He right. The jurors knew the liberal press would dox them and destroy their lives if they let chauvin go.

https://www.breitbart.com/crime/202...onviction-should-be-reversed-on-appeal-biden/

aprill 20 2021 Dershowitz told Newsmax:

What was done to George Floyd by Officer Chauvin was inexcusable, morally. But the verdict is very questionable, because of the outside influences of people like Al Sharpton, and people like Maxine Waters. Their threats and intimidation, and hanging the sword of Damocles over the jury, and basically saying if you don’t convict on the murder charge, on all the charges, the cities will burn, the country will be destroyed, seeped into the jury room because the judge made a terrible mistake by not sequestering the jury. So the judge himself said, this case may be reversed on appeal. And I think it might reversed on appeal. I think it should be reversed on appeal.

I think the American Civil Liberties Union, which would be all over this case if it weren’t a racially-charged case, all Americans who care about due process and liberty should be concerned that the jury verdict may have been influenced by, if not the thumb, maybe even the elbow of the outside pressures, the fears, the threats.

Every juror in that room knew about those threats. And when they sit and deliberate, they have to be saying to themselves, consciously or unconsciously, if I were to render a verdict other than a murder verdict, what the consequences will be, for me, and my family, my friends, my business. That should never, ever, bellowed to seep into a jury room. So I have no real confidence that this verdict — which may be correct in some ways — but I have no confidence that this verdict was produced by due process and the rule of law, rather than the influence of the crowd.
Click to expand...
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
He right. The jurors knew the liberal press would dox them and destroy their lives if they let chauvin go.
Click to expand...

NEVER CONFUSE A PRESS WITH BEING LIBERAL JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE HONEST AND STATE THE FACTS TO PRODUCE RESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM!

IF THAT IS LIBERAL- THEN I AM A PROUD LIBERAL!

We all realize you are a racist asshole that tried to make CHAUVIN your hero because he killed you a Black Person!

That made your little sticker PECK out- didn't it?

And so now you are here to cry us a little river! LOL! CRY! BABY! CRY!

giphy.gif


Just looking back through the years at your threads- YOU DO NOTHING BUT SHOW EVERYBODY YOUR LITTLE SORE ASS- WITH EVERY ONE OF YOUR CHICKEN-SHIT LITTLE MINDLESS RACIAL THREADS!
 
Last edited:
If there was ever a time I thought Dershowitz was credible, it disappeared about the time his name was connected to Epstein and he went full Trump retard. I don't think those two events are unrelated.
 
Trumptards want to institute a kangaroo court system in which their Orange God is judge, jury and executioner. They are treasonous snakes. They hate everything about America.
 
Concart said:
If there was ever a time I thought Dershowitz was credible, it disappeared about the time his name was connected to Epstein and he went full Trump retard. I don't think those two events are unrelated.
Click to expand...
Weinstein too.
 
the American Civil Liberties Union, which would be all over this case if it weren’t a racially-charged case, all Americans who care about due process and liberty should be concerned that the jury verdict may have been influenced by, if not the thumb, maybe even the elbow of the outside pressures, the fears, the threats.

Every juror in that room knew about those threats.
And when they sit and deliberate, they have to be saying to themselves, consciously or unconsciously, if I were to render a verdict other than a murder verdict, what the consequences will be, for me, and my family, my friends, my business. That should never, ever, bellowed to seep into a jury room.
 
LOL @ this thread.

Chauvin's attorneys would need to prove that what Waters said influenced the jury, and the only way they can do that is to get all 12 members of the jury to agree to that.

The judge instructed the jury not to watch the news, so how would they have even known about this?
 
LV426 said:
LOL @ this thread.

Chauvin's attorneys would need to prove that what Waters said influenced the jury, and the only way they can do that is to get all 12 members of the jury to agree to that.
Click to expand...
1 member is all that is needed to say they felt pressured. more of your stupidity
 
LV426 said:
But the judge said they weren't allowed to watch the news.
So where is this going to go?
Click to expand...
they were not sequestered prior to the verdict.

The trial should have been moved -the jury sequestered, since since the coverage was everywhere-
not just their home news/devices
 
dukkha said:
they were not sequestered prior to the verdict.
Click to expand...

But the judge said not to watch the news.

So why would a juror, who spent the whole trial obeying the judge, not obey the judge?


The trial should have been moved -the jury sequestered, since since the coverage was everywhere-
Click to expand...

Whose fault is that? Yours.
 
Dersh has lost it. He is wrong. A mistrial is remote because the jury heard nothing of it. This was such a clear and easy case. It is not getting harder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top