Obstruction of Justice...

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Lets start at the start...

Does everyone agree Obstruction of Justice is a crime?
 
I think we are way beyond the "nothing burger" phase, and way down the rabbit hole, folks.

Short of eating babies on live television, I actually think no amount of lying, corruption, collusion, incompetence, and deception are going to dissuade those who used to support impeachment for a consensual blowjob, from supporting Trump with every fiber of their being.
 
Nordberg said:
Trump has obstructed many times. I hope he does not get away with it.
Click to expand...

:lolup:Lying liberal moron doesn't know what obstruction of justice is. :rofl2:

giphy.gif
 
Cypress said:
I think we are way beyond the "nothing burger" phase, and way down the rabbit hole, folks.
Click to expand...

:lolup:Brain dead clueless liberal thinks this is IT!!! :rofl2: How many times are you foinf to erupit with this stupidity and look like an ass before you comprehend you look like an ass? That was rhetorical of course.

giphy.gif
 
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees



Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


---------
That's the definition that matters. Now, the question is does tweeting something along the lines of "Mueller is on a witch hunt" rise to that definition?

Does destroying a server that is supposed to be used as evidence against Russian hackers rise to that definition?
 
LutherF said:
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees



Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


---------
That's the definition that matters. Now, the question is does tweeting something along the lines of "Mueller is on a witch hunt" rise to that definition?

Does destroying a server that is supposed to be used as evidence against Russian hackers rise to that definition?
Click to expand...

And if said server is under subpoena
 
LutherF said:
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees



Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


---------
That's the definition that matters. Now, the question is does tweeting something along the lines of "Mueller is on a witch hunt" rise to that definition?

Does destroying a server that is supposed to be used as evidence against Russian hackers rise to that definition?
Click to expand...

:lolup:Idiot thinks cutting and pasting the law is an argument. :rofl2:

Snowflake, look at me, what is Trump doing to obstruct justice? Moron.
 
BREAKING NEWS: Black Man buys Beer and Bourbon ... no ID was asked of him.

Oh the Horror ... someone send Mrs Tweety the outrage. :awesome:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top