Unfettered capitalism is evil

evince said:
china is losening its regulation on capitalism because they realized the beautiful parts of capitalism.


It now producing for them good results


they did have to pull back from time to time when their CEOs poisened animals with bad food because of the CEOs greed.


things like that


overall they still have way more goverenment control over commerse than the US does huh
Click to expand...
Facts
 
canceled.2021.3 said:
Wrong. The wrong kind of deregulation. You are an economic illiterate. You are the worst kind of idiot. You find some link in Wikipedia. You don't read it or if you, you don't understand it then you profess to be an expert. You are a fucking idiot. The world would be better off if you assumed room temperature
Click to expand...
No facts provided

Try again asshole
 
Callinectes said:
I don't care who uses it when they're referring to capitalism, they're using the word incorrectly. You can't adjust the level of fetter you apply. Something is either fettered or unfettered. The word you want is "regulated", and we most definitely do NOT have an UNREGULATED economic system.
Click to expand...
Fettered is a real word

Look it up if it confuses you
 
Cypress said:
I've seen wingnuts for over a decade lecture Desh.
635989464770511429-877912042_mansplain.png

The funny thing is, on the major issues of our generation, Desh has generally been correct, even prescient, while rightwingers have been catastrophically wrong.

Desh is correct, the term unfettered capitalism is widely used, in journalism, in economics, even the Pope used it. And it is within her purview to use the words and shades of meaning she wants to in her own thread.
Click to expand...
Thanks dude
 
cawacko said:
We have a shortage of housing in the Bay Area which has pushed prices up to astrnomical amounts and have forced middle class and P.O.C. out. Is it evil to loosen aka deregulate laws that restrict the building of housing?

Desh says deregulation is evil. What say you?
Click to expand...
Not what I said idiot

We need REGULATIONS that work

We need to adjust them as the situation requires


It’s for adults

Republicans deregulate everything

This Trump admin did just that huh asshole
 
Callinectes said:
So according to desh, I'm an asshole and not a dictionary

Also, I'm not allowed to "redefine" words, but according to you, SHE can

Desh has generally been correct about anything that she can observe within a 10 foot radius. Anything outside that circle, she's gonna be "generally" wrong. One thing she's right about, the term unfettered capitalism is widely used, in journalism, in economics, and yes, even the Pope used it. And they all used the word incorrectly. THAT was the point of my reply. If she would have said "Unregulated capitalism is evil", I would probably have said "gee, Captain Obvious, ya think?", and moved on. But I didn't know that she was the only one allowed to use the words and shades of meaning she wants to, while I am not.
Click to expand...
Only he is correct

All the dictionaries and encyclopedias are wrong to according to him
 
canceled.2021.3 said:
You wouldn't understand it. You were the dumbass who though rental income was "passive income" remember that dumbass?

So why should anyone listen to you? You have expressed zero ability to grasp basic frameworks related to economics and finance.

Your MO is to look up something on Wikipedia then post and claim to be an expert
Click to expand...
Did you predict the 2008 crash?

I did


Did you know Bush was lying us to war in Iraq?


I did
 
cawacko said:
Actually integrity is extremely important to me. TTQ64 and I were going to grab a drink in SF political disagreements on this board be damned. Then she called out my integrity on this board.

Now maybe you agree with Desh that I'm evil, racist,a traitor, the worst father in the world and hoping my daughter hates me. If you agree with her why would you want to grab a drink with me?
Click to expand...
She grabbed on with me
 
Ralph said:
To bad that we live in a REPUBLIC and not a social democracy as explained in Article 4 Section 4 Clause 1.

To the contrary.....Our founders proclaimed that a "pure democracy" was historically the worst form of government, especially socialism...as it always ends in violence and revolution. As detailed in Federalist No. 10

Thus, the Republic of the United States of America is in no way a pure democracy.....it was designed as a republic and must be governed as a republic by constitutional degree. When its attempted to be redesigned as a democracy....the results are always the same...violence and turbulence.

Simply look at the violence now taking place.....its from the left, its nothing but random mobs attempting to destroy private property under the guise of freedom of speech while the criminals hide in the crowd with the hope of anonymity.

As I have said many times. Our founders were genius loci. Their spirits are still protecting us from the "FOOLS" within our society that simply want to take from their neighbors without ever contributing to the Republic that protects them from their own stupidity. :)
Click to expand...
They hated pure democracy

So do I

Then they invented a brand new form of democracy

One that wasn’t PURE

one that took ideas from different forms of existing ideas of government


They created a brand new path for human kind


It changed the dictionary definitions of democracy


They combined a republic with a democracy


A BRILLIANT IDEA

The right doesn’t like the democratic part of that plan

They want a pure republic

Where the wealthy chose who represents the people

Republics without democracy are trash
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top