It would come down 4 to 4.
Which means they can hear it again later. Those tie decisions hold no precedent.
It would come down 4 to 4.
Which means they can hear it again later. Those tie decisions hold no precedent.
They don't? How so?
It would come down 4 to 4.
well there is a certain amount of "administrative discretion". Generally the executive can prioritize administrative duties.
But I completely agree with you here that Obama has -in many cases - willfully ignored the will of Congress.
There is that immigration case (DARPA?) if it ever gets to the SCOTUS that will be determinative
when its way right wing
you see he KNOWS your shits don't represent that majority of the people
He knows your history of cheating voters out of their rights to STEAL the power from the people
Conservatives think Obama flouts the Constitution despite the checks and balances in the system.
Lower court rulings prevail, as though the SCOTUS never heard the case in a SC 4-4 decision..
I agree. After reading up on her political beliefs, I was surprised. At first I didn't understand why it was even a news story, then I read about her political viewpoints.