Congratulations dumbass, white trash America....

Amadeus said:
Well, what do you suggest? Iraq would have been able to put American soldiers on trial if not for a Status of Forces Agreement. And if they asked Americans to leave altogether, which they did, then the only alternative is to illegally occupy the population.

That sound like good foreign policy to you?
Click to expand...

I was living in the States during Obama's campaign. A huge part of his platform was ending the war in Iraq. You recall Code Pink I'm sure. I hope you're not calling him a subhuman liar.

Then of course, he put them back in.
 
blackvegetable said:
So explain "Make America Great Again"........or the campaign fueled by xenophobic hysteria....

Can you bring yourself to acknowledge that Obama, by an enormous margin, outperformed his caucasian predecessor?
Click to expand...

Obama brought this country to the brink of destruction and ripped it in two. Fortunately, it would take a lot longer than 8 years to bring down the great USA.

Yep, you were riding high with your race baiting Racist-in-Chief and now it's all down the drain.

Just as I predicted.
 
GazzaQueen said:
Good to know US foreign policy is dictated by foreign governments. I hope they don't tell us to leave again. And then come back and then leave.
Click to expand...

In Iraqnam, the US IS the foreign government, you fucking idiot.

and Ronald Reagan agreed to the binding arbitration governing that matter.

You really don't know shit, Tranny....
 
blackvegetable said:
So explain "Make America Great Again"........or the campaign fueled by xenophobic hysteria....

Can you bring yourself to acknowledge that Obama, by an enormous margin, outperformed his caucasian predecessor?
Click to expand...

Obama did outperform Bush. At it's peak, Obama put a record number of Americans on food stamps. 45 million or so to be accurate.
 
blackvegetable said:
In Iraqnam, the US IS the foreign government, you fucking idiot.

and Ronald Reagan agreed to the binding arbitration governing that matter.

You really don't know shit, Tranny....
Click to expand...

Ah. Then bringing the troops out and putting them back in had nothing to do with some agreement and I was right all along.

This is why Obama lost his legacy.
 
Deplorable Me said:
Obama brought this country to the brink of destruction and ripped it in two. Fortunately, it would take a lot longer than 8 years to bring down the great USA.

Yep, you were riding high with your race baiting Racist-in-Chief and now it's all down the drain.

Just as I predicted.
Click to expand...

Can't do it, can you.....

Let's see it in pictures...

here's what YOU enabled


fredgraph.jpg



here is what I supported

jpg



Any questions, dumbass?
 
GazzaQueen said:
I was living in the States during Obama's campaign. A huge part of his platform was ending the war in Iraq. You recall Code Pink I'm sure. I hope you're not calling him a subhuman liar.
Click to expand...

Regardless of what Obama promised or ran on, these are the facts:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...c5a418-f25c-11e3-914c-1fbd0614e2d4_story.html

A senior official closely involved with Iraq in the Bush administration told me, “Not only did Maliki not try to do broad power-sharing, he reneged on all the deals that had been made, stopped paying the Sunni tribes and militias, and started persecuting key Sunni officials.” Among those targeted were the vice president of Iraq and its finance minister.

But how did Maliki come to be prime minister of Iraq? He was the product of a series of momentous decisions made by the Bush administration. Having invaded Iraq with a small force — what the expert Tom Ricks called “the worst war plan in American history” — the administration needed to find local allies. It quickly decided to destroy Iraq’s Sunni ruling establishment and empower the hard-line Shiite religious parties that had opposed Saddam Hussein. This meant that a structure of Sunni power that had been in the area for centuries collapsed. These moves — to disband the army, dismantle the bureaucracy and purge Sunnis in general — might have been more consequential than the invasion itself.
Click to expand...

...

If the Bush administration deserves a fair share of blame for “losing Iraq,” what about the Obama administration and its decision to withdraw American forces from the country by the end of 2011? I would have preferred to see a small American force in Iraq to try to prevent the country’s collapse. But let’s remember why this force is not there. Maliki refused to provide the guarantees that every other country in the world that hosts U.S. forces offers. Some commentators have blamed the Obama administration for negotiating badly or halfheartedly and perhaps this is true. But here’s what a senior Iraqi politician told me in the days when the U.S. withdrawal was being discussed: “It will not happen. Maliki cannot allow American troops to stay on. Iran has made very clear to Maliki that its No. 1 demand is that there be no American troops remaining in Iraq. And Maliki owes them.” He reminded me that Maliki spent 24 years in exile, most of them in Tehran and Damascus, and his party was funded by Iran for most of its existence. And in fact, Maliki’s government has followed policies that have been pro-Iranian and pro-Syrian.
Click to expand...
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
Wait? What?

You mean even if I thread ban you, you can start another thread on your own on the same topic? Are you fucking serious? How the fuck did that get by me? I had no idea that could happen.

Well there is that plan down the tubes. Damn you are so wiley. I knew I couldn't pull one over on you ;)

I really do hope you don't need the sarcasm explained to you.

Think about it. I am burrowed so deep into your thoughts that you take the time to copy and paste my threads in new threads. That is how influential I am on JPP.

Learn it. Love it. Live it.
Click to expand...

You are almost as stupid as Annette and way more of a fag.
 
GazzaQueen said:
Ah. Then bringing the troops out and putting them back in had nothing to do with some agreement and I was right all along.

This is why Obama lost his legacy.
Click to expand...

You aren't much for linear thinking, are you, Tranny?

How do you go from "In Iraqnam, the US is the foreign government" to "the withdrawal consistent with the terms of the 2008 SOFA was had nothing to do with the 2008 SOFA"?

Obama's legacy is writ large in his outgoing JARs........I know that really hurts you deep....
 
CFM said:
Obama ran on people being able to keep their doctors and healthcare plans if they like them. The FACT is many who did like them couldn't keep them. That makes Obama a liar.
Click to expand...

Partially correct. He didn't actually lie, though -- the insurance companies withdrew those policies because they didn't meet the new standards for adequate insurance coverage (in other words, the previous insurance plans were JUNK).
 
Amadeus said:
Regardless of what Obama promised or ran on, these are the facts:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...c5a418-f25c-11e3-914c-1fbd0614e2d4_story.html


...
Click to expand...

So it's not Reagan? lol

Obama was the POTUS and no one can doubt that the US owned Iraq, for better or for worse. He could have chosen to keep them there, rather than remove them only to see the error and reverse his own decision.

His failed foreign policies and Hillary's promise to continue them is another reason why his legacy is as gone as Hillary's dreams.
 
blackvegetable said:
You aren't much for linear thinking, are you, Tranny?

How do you go from "In Iraqnam, the US is the foreign government" to "the withdrawal consistent with the terms of the 2008 SOFA was had nothing to do with the 2008 SOFA"?

Obama's legacy is writ large in his outgoing JARs........I know that really hurts you deep....
Click to expand...

You seem confused. Did Reagan or Bush dictate Obama's decision to withdraw US troops before putting them back in?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top