floridafan
Verified User
Once again this woman is only 1 of 9 in addition to the other daming information that has been obtained
Gloria Allred Refuses to Release Yearbook
- Thread starter Stretch
- Start date
Once again this woman is only 1 of 9 in addition to the other daming information that has been obtained
You know nothing as has been stated all falsifiable claims against Trump have been debunked.
floridafan
Verified User
Thats a complete and total lie
Then provide a falsifiable accusation which has been proven true, I'll wait.
Moore was not assigned to her case. Are you for real?
lol
You seem to have difficulty in space and time. I realize what Moore’s attorney is claiming. Let’s see the stamp on the 1992 court document, pally boy. That should be public record, shouldn’t it? Your conspiracy theiry that it’s the same stamp would be obvious, wouldn’t it?
The DA in the yearbook, which is what I’m trying to tell you, can mean District Attorney.
It could mean dum ass too.....get over it dumer....
We already know what the DA meant....it was his court room assistant....
he wasn't the District Attorney then in 1977 nor was he when the court documents about mommies divorce were signed in 1999...
I don't think he ever was a District Attorney....but I'm not gonna research for you.....
So lets just verify the yearbook signature....simple enough....
I'm getting bored with schooling you every 20 minutes....
Birmingham, ALABAMA — Delbra Adams, Roy Moore’s former longtime secretary and judicial assistant, says that in 13 years of working for the senatorial candidate she never saw or experienced any inappropriate conduct toward women.
Adams was working in Moore’s law office during the period that a new accuser claims that he groped her in the same office in 1991 after a meeting. Her desk was right outside his office door at the time.
“I think he is a good man,” Adams told Breitbart News in an interview. “I don’t believe any of this. I don’t believe it until somebody actually proves it to me. But I never saw anything like that out of him.”
Asked whether she saw or experienced any inappropriate conduct on the part of Moore at any time, Adams replied, “No. None.”
https://politiciandirect.com/politi...longtime-secretary-i-dont-believe-any-of-this
At least that could be easily proven one way or another...hopefully somebody will produce her divorce final judgment. It's got to be in the public records somewhere. Nelson may also have her own copy at home, too.
The documents do show that Nelson, then Beverly Harris, filed a divorce action against her then-husband in May of 1999. All of the initial documents, however, were signed by a different district judge, W. D. Russell. On May 25, 1999, Judge Russell scheduled the first hearing for the case for June 16.
But that hearing never took place. In June, before the scheduled hearing was set to take place, she filed for a motion to “continue” (delay) the hearing because she and her husband “are going to counseling and are attempting to reconcile.”
A month later, she filed a motion to dismiss the case. That appears to be the only document Moore signed, and given there was no hearing, there is no reason the divorce action would have required her to enter the courthouse or have contact with Moore.
Moore’s attorney acknowledged that he didn’t even personally sign this document. Rather, it was a routine filing where his name was stamped by an assistant. Nelson did eventually file for divorce again, but it was five years later, and a different judge, District Judge Donald W. Stewart, oversaw and signed the final divorce papers.
https://thinkprogress.org/roy-moore-beverly-nelson-divorce-2aeaeeb17ce9/
But that hearing never took place. In June, before the scheduled hearing was set to take place, she filed for a motion to “continue” (delay) the hearing because she and her husband “are going to counseling and are attempting to reconcile.”
A month later, she filed a motion to dismiss the case. That appears to be the only document Moore signed, and given there was no hearing, there is no reason the divorce action would have required her to enter the courthouse or have contact with Moore.
Moore’s attorney acknowledged that he didn’t even personally sign this document. Rather, it was a routine filing where his name was stamped by an assistant. Nelson did eventually file for divorce again, but it was five years later, and a different judge, District Judge Donald W. Stewart, oversaw and signed the final divorce papers.
https://thinkprogress.org/roy-moore-beverly-nelson-divorce-2aeaeeb17ce9/
The documents do show that Nelson, then Beverly Harris, filed a divorce action against her then-husband in May of 1999. All of the initial documents, however, were signed by a different district judge, W. D. Russell. On May 25, 1999, Judge Russell scheduled the first hearing for the case for June 16.
But that hearing never took place. In June, before the scheduled hearing was set to take place, she filed for a motion to “continue” (delay) the hearing because she and her husband “are going to counseling and are attempting to reconcile.”
A month later, she filed a motion to dismiss the case. That appears to be the only document Moore signed, and given there was no hearing, there is no reason the divorce action would have required her to enter the courthouse or have contact with Moore.
Moore’s attorney acknowledged that he didn’t even personally sign this document. Rather, it was a routine filing where his name was stamped by an assistant. Nelson did eventually file for divorce again, but it was five years later, and a different judge, District Judge Donald W. Stewart, oversaw and signed the final divorce papers.
https://thinkprogress.org/roy-moore-beverly-nelson-divorce-2aeaeeb17ce9/
Right ! Very good.....
DA ALWAYS means his assistant’s initials, huh? Sure it does, pally boy.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
admittedly I am not a handwriting expert, but I notice that every single letter is different......
The documents do show that Nelson, then Beverly Harris, filed a divorce action against her then-husband in May of 1999. All of the initial documents, however, were signed by a different district judge, W. D. Russell. On May 25, 1999, Judge Russell scheduled the first hearing for the case for June 16.
But that hearing never took place. In June, before the scheduled hearing was set to take place, she filed for a motion to “continue” (delay) the hearing because she and her husband “are going to counseling and are attempting to reconcile.”
A month later, she filed a motion to dismiss the case. That appears to be the only document Moore signed, and given there was no hearing, there is no reason the divorce action would have required her to enter the courthouse or have contact with Moore.
Moore’s attorney acknowledged that he didn’t even personally sign this document. Rather, it was a routine filing where his name was stamped by an assistant. Nelson did eventually file for divorce again, but it was five years later, and a different judge, District Judge Donald W. Stewart, oversaw and signed the final divorce papers.
https://thinkprogress.org/roy-moore-beverly-nelson-divorce-2aeaeeb17ce9/
Thank-you for that info CFan.
OK, so what do we have now? I swear I'm getting more and more confused.
Here's the yearbook sig:
The sig looks a little different on some of the letters on the divorce paper and also he uses 'S' as his middle initial. Both have '/D.A.'
Is it possible that a few yearbooks were handed to Moore to sign. Notice he did not personalize it to "Beverly". Then Delbra Adams added the 'D.A.', plus the date, plus printing 'Olde Hickory House' and handed them back?
Maybe Beverly's was the only one? Maybe Moore & Adams were lunching or dining there at the Olde Hickory House and Beverly was their waitress and did not get her name?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
admittedly I am not a handwriting expert, but I notice that every single letter is different......
I kind of saw that also; but then, I'm not a liberal handwriting expert.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
So, what you're saying is Donald Trump is as bad as Bill Clinton.
Okay, then we agree. Thanks.
countryboy
Verified User
admittedly I am not a handwriting expert, but I notice that every single letter is different......
And where's the "S"?
This could be cleared up in short order by handwriting and ink analysis. As long as the accuser refuses to allow this, I can only assume it's bullshit.
The S is on the stamp, moron.
countryboy
Verified User
The stamp is a copy of his actual signature, dumbass.
How'd I do? It's traditional to end every response with an insult, yes? Civil discourse is against the rules, right?