See ya, Matt

christiefan915 said:
1. I never called you names until you started that shit, liar. And nice sidestep from the fact that your friends used the word "skank" and you gave them a pass.

2. I wasn't talking about MM and don't know what he said about your wife. I was talking about Winterborn and your ugly comments about his wife and children, when he said nothing about yours.
Click to expand...

1. Nice attempt at side-step. Again, I'm not the one whining about being called names. Call me whatever you like, and expect me to reciprocate in kind.
2. Nice second attempt to select only a part of the story. Why are you so afraid to tell all of it?
 
Right said:
1. Nice attempt at side-step. Again, I'm not the one whining about being called names. Call me whatever you like, and expect me to reciprocate in kind.
2. Nice second attempt to select only a part of the story. Why are you so afraid to tell all of it?
Click to expand...

Wow, is that your defense?

1. What names did I call you that caused you to reciprocate?

2. Did WB attack your wife and children, yes or no?
 
Last edited:
Yaya said:
Go ahead.

Notice how she still won't call out rune, while bitching about me.

Two faced.
Click to expand...

Zappa, Thing 1, me, Covfefe, Rune, Evince, BAC, signalmankenneth... to name a few.

Why should I call out Rune, loser? Because you want to involve me in your fights with other posters? Grow up.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
It's more like the men vs the women, but unlike in the contard swamps, we try to get rid of our alligators rather than embracing them as "manly men" and electing them to high office.
Click to expand...

High Office? Laugh My Ass Off. You just endorsed an enabler of a confirmed sexual predator for the highest office in the land.

Right....just like you got rid of the Clinton's when Bill preyed on women and Hillary demonized the victims of Bill...as the left leaning voters and the media carried the water for the Clinton predatory machine. Now "decades" later you have decided to champion the victims of crime rather than the criminals? Really? :good4u: Hell you endorsed a female that is guilty as hell in attacking the victims of a sexual predator. What has changed? The daily talking point coming from the DNC?

This sudden "change of heart" is not of a voluntary nature. Look for something Big to come down the pike from the DOJ involving the 1800 sealed indictments now resting within the scope of the DOJ to enforce. Heads are going to roll.....this sudden change by the demonRATS is an attempt to distance themselves from the fallout that is sure come. In other words they are attempting to cover their own asses. They are no more concerned with women's rights than they are concerned in supporting President Trump.
 
Last edited:
Ralph said:
Right....just like you got rid of the Clinton's when Bill preyed on women and Hillary demonized the victims of Bill...as the left leaning voters and the media carried the water for the Clinton predatory machine. Now "decades" later you have decided to champion the victims of crime rather than the criminals? Really? :good4u:
Click to expand...

And Melania demonized trump's victims so what's your point?
 
christiefan915 said:
Wow, is that your defense?

1. What names did I call you that caused you to reciprocate?

2. Did WB attack your wife and children, yes or no?
Click to expand...

1. You called my friends names.
2. He defended MM who attacked my family, ultimately getting perm-banned due to it.

You're trying to thread a needle here, but the hole is too small for your fat rope.
 
Right said:
1. You called my friends names.
2. He defended MM who attacked my family, ultimately getting perm-banned due to it.

You're trying to thread a needle here, but the hole is too small for your fat rope.
Click to expand...

1. You lied when you said you reciprocate when someone calls Y O U names. Hypocrisy.

2. Your friends called me and my friends names long before we came to JPP. And it was none of your business. Double standard.

3. You criticized WB's wife and children over something MM did to you. Tasteless.

I think it's clear that your duplicity has been exposed here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top