There’s still no ‘there’ there in the Russia probe

Sure. And after all of the investigating into the Clintons, you guys couldn't even get so much as an indictment w/ them.

With the indictments, we got to see some of what he has so far. If you don't think it's plenty to at least justify the investigation, I can't really help you. You seem to be in a sort of "knee jerk" mode of defending Trump, and you hate to cede anything to the liberals on this board, so that colors a lot of your posting here.

The Republican commissions found her innocent. But that does not mean they would not have launched a bunch more if she won. Investigations are now a Republican election ploy.
 
So many of your posts have already been debunked by what has happened. If someone wanted to, they could have a field day bumping old posts of yours - the indictments we've seen so far have already undermined completely your original assertions that there was absolutely nothing to anything.

You have to keep moving the goalposts. As with before, most of your "conclusions" are based on speculation - they have to be, because you have no idea whatsoever what Mueller really has.

If I was a betting man, I'd put money down that when we finally know what he has, you'll have to move the goalposts yet again.

I've always maintained there was no Russian collusion, and there is a Deep State.
Events HAVE proven that out & you are nuts/delusional to say i've moved any goalpost ..

Process crimes don't count thing-they occur because of the investigation, not an underlying 'da Russians"
 
How can it be partisan if all the players are on the same side lol?
Why do you post here you ignorant hillbilly toothless singlewide trailer dweller?
grotesque display of ignorance by Rune.
the players have roles which are determinative to their actions (based on motives, but not simple party registration)
 
I've always maintained there was no Russian collusion, and there is a Deep State.
Events HAVE proven that out & you are nuts/delusional to say i've moved any goalpost ..

Process crimes don't count thing-they occur because of the investigation, not an underlying 'da Russians"

They like to pretend that collusion is irrelevant, don’t they.
 
Prove I support it liar.
Everyone on this board knows that I am anti- military involvement in all foreign nations...that I have decried the Long War from the beginnings...that I have routinely called Hillary a war monger, abd even called out Obama for continuing aggressions and dronings in the middle east.

You are a liar, nobody pays any attention to liars which is why you are the laughing stock of this forum.

What a fucking asshole to try to falsely misrepresent my well known position.
Ha ! You've taken to calling it Long War! -which you used to give me grief for using.
It is exactly that. Generational and will not end until Islam comes to terms with salafi Islam..

Long War Journal -threat matrix and reportage/analysis
https://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-matrix-blog

You've never criticized Libya or Syrian meddling - and constantly defend Hillary's scurrilous warmongering
But you grew to understand GWOT, so there might be hope for you on condemning Hillary/Obama
 
Ha ! You've taken to calling it Long War! -which you used to give me grief for using.
It is exactly that. Generational and will not end until Islam comes to terms with salafi Islam..



You've never criticized Libya or Syrian meddling - and constantly defend Hillary's scurrilous warmongering
But you grew to understand GWOT, so there might be hope for you on condemning Hillary/Obama

Cheney named it Long War you stupid shitstain, I used it sarcasticly.

What is the point of condeming her when it is your avocation? idiot
 
Cheney named it Long War you stupid shitstain, I used it sarcasticly.

What is the point of condeming her when it is your avocation? idiot
ahh too bad..you had actually shown growth there.
...keeping the status quo with Hillary while you lambast her warmongering doesn't fit.
 
grotesque display of ignorance by Rune.
the players have roles which are determinative to their actions (based on motives, but not simple party registration)

Bullshit!
Words have actual meanings you fucking idiots.

By the way, moron, that isn't what determinative means, in fact it is a wildly inappropriate usage.
 
ahh too bad..you had actually shown growth there.
...keeping the status quo with Hillary while you lambast her warmongering doesn't fit.

Hillary is irrelevant except to cons and the truly obsessed ( you).

No one else ever mentions her.

Try to get over her already you fucking freak.
 
No, Snail shit.
It is the words you use that make you a misogynist. The sentence I quoted is the perfect example.

Let's break it down and watch you run like the little coward that you are.

Trump admits he can't control his sexuality...when he gets near beautiful women he automatically starts kissing them and grabs them by the pussy...
(Trump's own undeniable words)

20 women come forward and agreive sexual violations by Trump, which he now denies ( despite a huge payoff to a porn star who then changes her story)

Who do you believe?

Trump.

That makes you a misogynist AND an idiot, not me.

Refute this, retard.

anatta?
I am going to keep bumping this until you answer.
 
Back
Top