NRA Partners Dumping Murder Inc.

I doubt if any corporation "hates" despite Romney's insistence that corporations are people too, my friend. The airlines -- and the other companies severing ties with the despicable NRA -- are making a public statement of solidarity with the victims and their families. They no longer wish to be associated with an organization that is fighting tooth-and-nail against any measures to stop the murders. Surely you also support stopping the mass shootings too, right?

PS--I doubt if they have any say about air marshals being allowed on flights, since the marshals are federal employees and the airlines' safety measures are regulated by the federal government.

I haven't seen any mass murders by NRA members yet. And, yes sadly airline flights will continue to be forced to have peoples' lives protected.
 
So now the kids protesting and marching because their classmates were murdered are "snowflakes"? What the actual fuck, Stretch. What happened to all that Christiany stuff you were saying the other day?

BTW, my kids -- although slightly older than these millenials -- don't watch CNN for their news. I know very few their age who do.

Not all those rude disrespectful people who showed up at that CNN propaganda event were the Parkland survivors and their families. That thing had nothing to with the kids of Parkland. CNN made sure to let the mob go wild. There was no calm controlled thoughtful conversation or even exchange of ideas going on there.
No rational speaker there was allowed to explain to the crowd that their angst was misdirected at the NRA who had nothing whatever to do with the massacre at Parkland. It was a complete FUBAR by all levels of law enforcement and one lone non-NRA madman.
 
I wonder why. She seemed rational in prior discussions; fear though is a powerful thing. But what on earth should she be afraid of? That the NRA loses prestige and the ability to buy congress critters?

You libs would like the NRA to lose control of Congress, but that ain't gonna happen.
 
Not all those rude disrespectful people who showed up at that CNN propaganda event were the Parkland survivors and their families. That thing had nothing to with the kids of Parkland. CNN made sure to let the mob go wild. There was no calm controlled thoughtful conversation or even exchange of ideas going on there.
No rational speaker there was allowed to explain to the crowd that their angst was misdirected at the NRA who had nothing whatever to do with the massacre at Parkland. It was a complete FUBAR by all levels of law enforcement and one lone non-NRA madman.

I know that calm and thoughtful are important to those who wish to preserve the status quo. Definitely the Tories back in the 1770s preferred "calm" and didn't like the "rude disrespectful" rebels.
 
Yep. She's losing it. Using terms like 'hate' show that emotions have set in, and all rational thought is gone.

OK, I'll say "don't exactly like"..........how's that? My goodness if "hateful emotions" equals loss of rational thought.......congratulations! You win! LOL. Besides, I never said "I hated" ....I said "they hated".
 
I know that calm and thoughtful are important to those who wish to preserve the status quo. Definitely the Tories back in the 1770s preferred "calm" and didn't like the "rude disrespectful" rebels.

Well, I have a question then. Sincerely, I'm not being sarcastic.
Why do a lot (not all) liberal guests I listen to on various talk shows (FOX, CNN, MSNBC) all say, "We need to have a national discussion about this"?
The "this" could mean any topic like gun laws, transgenderism, crime, poverty in the inner cities, climate change, etc. I'm forever hearing we need a "national discussion". Only the far left and right fringes opt for the mob scenes, name-calling and destruction of property.
 
OK, I'll say "don't exactly like"..........how's that? My goodness if "hateful emotions" equals loss of rational thought.......congratulations! You win! LOL. Besides, I never said "I hated" ....I said "they hated".

Using hyperbole like the word "hate" is an exaggeration that shuts down rational discussion.

I'm curious -- why are you emotionally invested in protecting the NRA's tarnished image?
 
Using hyperbole like the word "hate" is an exaggeration that shuts down rational discussion.

I'm curious -- why are you emotionally invested in protecting the NRA's tarnished image?

I have no emotional attachment to them. It's just a shame to see a group that's never recommended violence be directed at innocent people be so attacked.
 
Well, I have a question then. Sincerely, I'm not being sarcastic.
Why do a lot (not all) liberal guests I listen to on various talk shows (FOX, CNN, MSNBC) all say, "We need to have a national discussion about this"?
The "this" could mean any topic like gun laws, transgenderism, crime, poverty in the inner cities, climate change, etc. I'm forever hearing we need a "national discussion". Only the far left and right fringes opt for the mob scenes, name-calling and destruction of property.

Good point about the fringe crazy shit. A "national discussion" is not at all like "mob scenes, name-calling and destruction of property." It's a discussion like we are having here, eh?

The reason you hear this more on liberal media outlets is because discussion and finding points in common are how we libs prefer to operate. For instance, you probably notice that in this discussion I have not called you names or mocked you or otherwise tried to shut you down. I respond in a civil way to your posts. You do too for the most part. The fact that you may not like what I say doesn't make them any less civil. Ditto for you in return. Real life has shown me that many conservative ppl prefer to do the same thing -- discuss issues and find common ground.

Rather than going at each other, we should be asking ourselves what's in it for "them" to keep us from finding that common ground, keeping us from having rational discussions that lead to compromise and positive changes that benefit everyone? How do politicians, the popular media, and our foreign adversaries profit when we're at each other's throats and destroying our country from the inside?
 
I have no emotional attachment to them. It's just a shame to see a group that's never recommended violence be directed at innocent people be so attacked.

You don't have to "recommend violence" outright to be guilty of fomenting it by implanting fear into ppl, pushing the purchase of people-killing machines, and buying elected officials to vote your way.

I don't know how you stand on the abortion issue, but here's a corollary. Planned Parenthood provides sexual education and counseling, birth control, diagnosis and treatment of sexually-transmitted diseases, cancer screening, education and medical assistance for sexual health for both men and women, and in a few centers they provide abortions. In other words, they are an advocacy group much like the NRA.... The only difference is the NRA does not actively shoot ppl; PP does provide abortions (3% of what they do). PP doesn't have a powerful lobby and doesn't buy elected officials; NRA does.

Which is more guilty?
 
The NRA offers training in marksmanship, gun safety & responsibility, rules for safe gun handling, etc.



The Susan B. Anthony List’s numbers derive from Planned Parenthood’s 2013-14 annual report.

The first caveat to know is that Planned Parenthood does not have a category for "pregnancy services." That’s a category the Susan B. Anthony List created, and the background reasoning has been the same as similarly misleading claims over the years.

On the fact sheet, "pregnancy services" are broken down into three categories: abortions, prenatal care and adoption referrals. Susan B. Anthony List spokeswoman Mallory Quigley said these are the three ways a woman can respond to a pregnancy.

With that in mind, here’s the section from Planned Parenthood’s annual report that contains those categories.

c_zU5iPavLfB0F_gX5R5BoFLKs5YQ0-mLlGyJ8A-5MLxeHNTS-7IpXYHFtR1bmILwFJFbZtkR5Vr6ox_m0Csm7M2dgsMhG4P1XVUfz2Ilpd4-twzWIFlWwGcJbT30FcLihu7YG4


To arrive at the Susan B. Anthony List figure, you have to tease out specific elements from the chart: prenatal services (18,684), adoption referrals (1,880) and abortions (327,653). Abortions account for 94 percent of the sum of these subcategories.

For several reasons, that’s a misleading way to analyze the data.

Referrals for prenatal care not in equation

Not all of Planned Parenthood approximately 700 clinics offer prenatal services because prenatal care is not Planned Parenthood's focus. As a result, many pregnant women are referred to outside obstetricians or other health providers for prenatal care.

Politifact
and
Susan B Anthony List
 
The NRA offers training in marksmanship, gun safety & responsibility, rules for safe gun handling, etc.

True! And that was their original mission -- to promote the shooting sports, hunter knowledge, gun safety, etc. Then they went to the Dark Side.
 
Clearly there is no need for taxpayer support of PP. All of their services are already provided and paid for by our taxes at every State Health Dept. found in every county in the nation....EXCEPT referrals for abortions. Abortions are PP's bread & butter.
 
I know that calm and thoughtful are important to those who wish to preserve the status quo. Definitely the Tories back in the 1770s preferred "calm" and didn't like the "rude disrespectful" rebels.
Yes. Did you notice how 'calm and thoughtful' La Pierre/Loesch were? They 'calmed' themselves right out of numerous sponsors.
 
Did I miss the answer to the explanation of the NRA going to the "dark side"...and what that "dark side" is? How many more people have to ask? But ok... What's the "dark side"?
 
Back
Top