Ted Nugent proves a shotgun is deadlier than an AR-15

Q-Tip

Banned
Excerpt from the full video Ted Nugent: The Music Made Me Do Itcoming soon to Infowars.com. Here, Ted demonstrates the killing power of a shotgun compared to an AR-15.


https://www.infowars.com/ted-nugent-proves-a-shotgun-is-deadlier-than-an-ar-15/

But the terrified left doesn't want to hear that fact noooo they prefer to listen to their bs masters telling them pure bs because why they know they are that stupid and lazy.

Liberals are the party of liars!
 
Last edited:
"But the terrified left doesn't want to hear that fact noooo they prefer to listen to their bs masters" QT
?!
This lead post is a fount of abysmal ignorance, and feebly supported agenda.

a) Lethality in terminal ballistics is quantified in foot pounds of energy delivered to target.

b) I welcome anyone to quote anyone from the ostensible "terrified left" (the precise term used in the lead) asserting the AR-15 delivers more foot pounds to target than the most powerful shotgun, or perhaps more precisely, smooth-bore long gun.

c) The horrified left shares the conservative alarm at the carnage being perpetrated in our government schools.

d) The issue with the AR-15, the similar Bushmaster, and other high capacity assault STYLE carbines is NOT the foot pounds they deliver per round.

Instead it's the number of rounds it can deliver quickly.

And to prove my counterpoint I challenge Nugent or QT to a 60 second firing range contest.
The shotgunner can take take a shotgun like that depicted in the still graphic in the lead,
and I'll take an AR-15, and in a simultaneous 60 second firing match, I'll allow the shotgunner to fire as many times as s/he can.
And during those same 60 seconds, I'll fire the AR-15 as often as I can. Both gunners will be allowed to reload during the exhibition.

When the minute has fully elapsed, we can count the number of shots fired from each weapon.

And my wager:
In those 60 seconds I will with the AR-15 fire twice the number of rounds fired by the shotgun; and perhaps more than twice.

This topic is absurd.

Note:
My offer ONLY stands if the shotgunner covers all my expenses, including travel, hotel, meals, and all other costs.
 
well this is craptastic hyperbolistic bullshit. the AR 15 is a decent weapon, but it's strengths are only evident in a weapon masters hands.......and that is what can a marksman do with it at 500 yards...........

anything else is just fear based hysteria.
 
Quit being a blithering dingus Annieoakley. You, and Nugent for that matter have no more credibility on this issue, than a twerp, that's picking their nose in line at Taco Bell.
 
Quit being a racist, troll, sockpuppet who pisses kidney stones while obsessively and compulsively counting the number of homeless men passed out on your bathroom floor.
 
well this is craptastic hyperbolistic bullshit. the AR 15 is a decent weapon, but it's strengths are only evident in a weapon masters hands.......and that is what can a marksman do with it at 500 yards...........
anything else is just fear based hysteria." SmarterthanYou
Are you calling the Sandy Hook school massacre shooter a master?

Are you calling the corpses of the students from multiple school massacres "just fear based hysteria"?

That doesn't even pass for rational.
"SmarterthanYou"
Nope.
If your comment / opinion quoted above is representative, you're a half-wit.
 
Nope.
If your comment / opinion quoted above is representative, you're a half-wit.

I've ignored most of your posts because you don't seem to be able to use the quote function correctly, but you need to clarify what you're talking about here with me.
 
Excerpt from the full video Ted Nugent: The Music Made Me Do Itcoming soon to Infowars.com. Here, Ted demonstrates the killing power of a shotgun compared to an AR-15.


https://www.infowars.com/ted-nugent-proves-a-shotgun-is-deadlier-than-an-ar-15/

But the terrified left doesn't want to hear that fact noooo they prefer to listen to their bs masters telling them pure bs because why they know they are that stupid and lazy.

Liberals are the party of liars!

giphy.gif
 
Excerpt from the full video Ted Nugent: The Music Made Me Do Itcoming soon to Infowars.com. Here, Ted demonstrates the killing power of a shotgun compared to an AR-15.


https://www.infowars.com/ted-nugent-proves-a-shotgun-is-deadlier-than-an-ar-15/

But the terrified left doesn't want to hear that fact noooo they prefer to listen to their bs masters telling them pure bs because why they know they are that stupid and lazy.

Liberals are the party of liars!


So your goal is to ban shotguns too? gotcha.
 
?!
This lead post is a fount of abysmal ignorance, and feebly supported agenda.

a) Lethality in terminal ballistics is quantified in foot pounds of energy delivered to target.

b) I welcome anyone to quote anyone from the ostensible "terrified left" (the precise term used in the lead) asserting the AR-15 delivers more foot pounds to target than the most powerful shotgun, or perhaps more precisely, smooth-bore long gun.

c) The horrified left shares the conservative alarm at the carnage being perpetrated in our government schools.

d) The issue with the AR-15, the similar Bushmaster, and other high capacity assault STYLE carbines is NOT the foot pounds they deliver per round.

Instead it's the number of rounds it can deliver quickly.

And to prove my counterpoint I challenge Nugent or QT to a 60 second firing range contest.
The shotgunner can take take a shotgun like that depicted in the still graphic in the lead,
and I'll take an AR-15, and in a simultaneous 60 second firing match, I'll allow the shotgunner to fire as many times as s/he can.
And during those same 60 seconds, I'll fire the AR-15 as often as I can. Both gunners will be allowed to reload during the exhibition.

When the minute has fully elapsed, we can count the number of shots fired from each weapon.

And my wager:
In those 60 seconds I will with the AR-15 fire twice the number of rounds fired by the shotgun; and perhaps more than twice.

This topic is absurd.

Note:
My offer ONLY stands if the shotgunner covers all my expenses, including travel, hotel, meals, and all other costs.

Now that you have read an article written by a DR. you've become an expert on ballistics?

What was the average distance these killers were from their victims? 15 to 25 feet? Maybe a few feet more?
Have you ever patterned a shotgun? If so, what choke was used? What # shot was used?
What gauge shotgun (20, 16, 12, 10) and length of chamber (2 3/4, 3, 3 1/2)? What was the barrel length?

Granted, the AR will fire more rounds, but then go count the number of holes in the target and then tell me
which one can be more lethal. Oh, and don't forget, you'll need to better aim as the distance gets greater.
 
"Now that you have read an article written by a DR. you've become an expert on ballistics?" R6
I read an article written by a DR.?
What was the DR's area of expertise?
What was the title of the article?
What did I learn from it?

Vastly more to the point, I stated facts. Has anyone (including you) refuted any of them? Instead you attempt to switch the topic to the alleged author of what you imagine my reading material to be. Who do you think you're kidding?
"What was the average distance these killers were from their victims? 15 to 25 feet? Maybe a few feet more?
Have you ever patterned a shotgun? If so, what choke was used? What # shot was used?
What gauge shotgun (20, 16, 12, 10) and length of chamber (2 3/4, 3, 3 1/2)? What was the barrel length?" R6
That and much more can have relevance.
But none of it undermines, or even addresses my unrefuted point about rate of fire, and the diminishing utility of overkill.
"Granted, the AR will fire more rounds, but then go count the number of holes in the target and then tell me
which one can be more lethal. Oh, and don't forget, you'll need to better aim as the distance gets greater." R6
The AR-15 is a lethal weapon.
So you and Nugent think a shotgun kills the victim even deader? This topic is bogus!
CERTAINLY a 12 ga. slug or sabot can deliver more foot pounds to target than a .223.

What I've refuted is:
"But the terrified left doesn't want to hear that fact noooo they prefer to listen to their bs masters telling them pure bs because why they know they are that stupid and lazy.
Liberals are the party of liars!" QT #1
That is just vacant blather from start to finish. And even if there was a semblance of validity to the underlying intended point, the argument/s in the lead are so conspicuously bogus that the entire lead post is invalidated.
"Granted, the AR will fire more rounds, but then go count the number of holes in the target and then tell me
which one can be more lethal. Oh, and don't forget, you'll need to better aim as the distance gets greater." R6
Even if true, irrelevant to classroom massacres. A sociopath with 180 rounds marches into a public school classroom and starts mowing people down could miss most of his targets multiple times, and still kill everyone in the room. That would be substantially more difficult to accomplish with an 1187.
 
Are you calling the Sandy Hook school massacre shooter a master?

Are you calling the corpses of the students from multiple school massacres "just fear based hysteria"?

That doesn't even pass for rational.

Nope.
If your comment / opinion quoted above is representative, you're a half-wit.

What does it take for you to learn how to use quote?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
He saw a "scary" looking one on TV once and it frightened him so much he shit his pants.
Probably like you when Bourbon invited you to a 'meeting', but you chickened out. What is they say, you're all hat but no cattle!!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Probably like you when Bourbon invited you to a 'meeting', but you chickened out. What is they say, you're all hat but no cattle!!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

Yet I still have the guns you say I shouldn't own but have been invited to come and try to take.
 
I read an article written by a DR.?
What was the DR's area of expertise?
What was the title of the article?
What did I learn from it?

Vastly more to the point, I stated facts. Has anyone (including you) refuted any of them? Instead you attempt to switch the topic to the alleged author of what you imagine my reading material to be. Who do you think you're kidding?

That and much more can have relevance.
But none of it undermines, or even addresses my unrefuted point about rate of fire, and the diminishing utility of overkill.

The AR-15 is a lethal weapon.
So you and Nugent think a shotgun kills the victim even deader? This topic is bogus!
CERTAINLY a 12 ga. slug or sabot can deliver more foot pounds to target than a .223.

What I've refuted is:

That is just vacant blather from start to finish. And even if there was a semblance of validity to the underlying intended point, the argument/s in the lead are so conspicuously bogus that the entire lead post is invalidated.

Even if true, irrelevant to classroom massacres. A sociopath with 180 rounds marches into a public school classroom and starts mowing people down could miss most of his targets multiple times, and still kill everyone in the room. That would be substantially more difficult to accomplish with an 1187.

So, what you're saying is that you cannot refute my statements.

As for the quote "But the terrified left doesn't want to hear that fact noooo they prefer to listen to their bs masters telling them pure bs because why they know they are that stupid and lazy.
Liberals are the party of liars!" QT #1" That statement was not mine, address the poster who posted it.

Ballistics aside, a .22 can be just as deadly as a .223, no?
And the statement "So you and Nugent think a shotgun kills the victim even deader? This topic is bogus!
CERTAINLY a 12 ga. slug or sabot can deliver more foot pounds to target than a .223." is silly.
If you had even a hint of knowledge of ballistics, you'd know at greater distances a shotgun slug loses both it's accuracy and energy because, well, gravity works.
 
Back
Top