OMG! ... McCabe FIRED !!!!!!!!!!

Stretch said:
According to I.G. Horowitz (regarding McCabe):

1) critical of McCabe’s handling of the Clinton email probe
2) his handling of the bureau during the early months of the Russia investigation
3) his ties to the Democratic Party.
4) McCabe hadn't been forthcoming in regard to the handling of the FBI’s probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state in the Obama administration.
5) faulted the former deputy director for the way he answered questions about his approval for interactions between an FBI official and a reporter about the bureau’s investigation into the nonprofit Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...

Horowitz is a Russian plant lol.
 
anatta said:
wrong again.She was very much the international architect as well as chief advocate in the U.S. NSC for regime change.
Her own State dept says so:


From: Mills, Cheryl D [mailto:MiIIsCD@state.gov]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 12:37 PM
To: H
Subject: FW: tick tock on libya
Here is Draft From: Jake Sullivan
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 7:40 PM
To: Mills, Cheryl D; Nuland, Victoria
Subject: tick tock on libya

this is basically off the top of my head, with a few consultations of my notes. but it shows S'Clinton leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country's libya policy from start to finish. let me know what you think. toria, who else might be able to add to this? Secretary Clinton's leadership on Libya HRC has been a critical voice on Libya in administration deliberations, at NATO, and in contact group meetings — as well as the public face of the U.S. effort in Libya. She was instrumental in securing the authorization, building the coalition, and tightening the noose around Qadhafi and his regime.
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/23898

^ State Dept Email from Sullivan to Mills/Nuland
Click to expand...

blah blah blah
one person's opinion proves nothing.

Your ignorance of Rothschild banks and their power to start wars is disturbing.
 
Rune said:
blah blah blah
one person's opinion proves nothing.

Your ignorance of Rothschild banks and their power to start wars is disturbing.
Click to expand...

How did the Rothschild banks start the war in Libya? TOTAL already had an oil concession in Libya.
 
Rune said:
Not doing 101 today.
Do some more research.
There hasn't been a war without Rothschild involvement in hundreds of years.
Click to expand...

There were 6 or 7 oil companies with concessions in Libya.. including TOTAL, ENI, BP .. Royal Dutch Shell, Occidental, Gazprom.. and several others.. maybe 12 including the minors and Sirte Oil company that used to be Esso Libya in Marsa Brega.
 
kudzu said:
There were 6 or 7 oil companies with concessions in Libya.. including TOTAL, ENI, BP .. Royal Dutch Shell, Occidental, Gazprom.. and several others.. maybe 12 including the minors and Sirte Oil company that used to be Esso Libya in Marsa Brega.
Click to expand...

Relevance?
 
Stretch said:
According to I.G. Horowitz (regarding McCabe):

1) critical of McCabe’s handling of the Clinton email probe
2) his handling of the bureau during the early months of the Russia investigation
3) his ties to the Democratic Party.
4) McCabe hadn't been forthcoming in regard to the handling of the FBI’s probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state in the Obama administration.
5) faulted the former deputy director for the way he answered questions about his approval for interactions between an FBI official and a reporter about the bureau’s investigation into the nonprofit Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...

According to JPP lefties McCabe is a die hard Republican even though he has ties to the democrat party and his wife ran for office as a democrat

Go figure


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top