Lt. Col. Ralph Peters says he's 'ashamed' of Fox News and leaves his role as analyst

And the msm doesn't break a sweat exposing it, they're all in bed together.

The "Deep State" stuff is no different from 9/11 truthers, or JFK conspiracy theorists. It's not plausible.

Too many people would need to be involved. The government can't do even the simplest operation without someone leaking something; a Deep State could not exist outside of maybe 2-3 people without us knowing everything about it.
 
I see them talk about the "corrupt FBI" all the time. They're all in on the usual Trump-apologist narratives, no matter what they are.

Is that what you're asking? Fox is Trump's network, through & through.
lol..so you don't buy into Strzok,Page McCabe, Ribicki?
I was referring to Fake News networks -do they even mention the upcoming Horowitz IG release?
 
The "Deep State" stuff is no different from 9/11 truthers, or JFK conspiracy theorists. It's not plausible.

Too many people would need to be involved. The government can't do even the simplest operation without someone leaking something; a Deep State could not exist outside of maybe 2-3 people without us knowing everything about it.
as usual you are wrong. it's a cabal of players..look at the FBI leadership. Page / Strzok / Mccabe and their
"insurance policy meeting.. Comey and Brennan's roles in shopping the steele dossier -swearing out FISA aps..
a small pool of conspirators..

But you can see it soon enough when the IG report comes out. even Fake News can't ignore that hot mess
 
lol..so you don't buy into Strzok,Page McCabe, Ribicki?
I was referring to Fake News networks -do they even mention the upcoming Horowitz IG release?

What do you mean, "buy into?" They acted unethically & were dealt with. That isn't systemic corruption, and it's incredibly irresponsible for you, Fox & Trump to portray it that way.
 
as usual you are wrong. it's a cabal of players..look at the FBI leadership. Page / Strzok / Mccabe and their
"insurance policy meeting.. Comey and Brennan's roles in shopping the steele dossier -swearing out FISA aps..
a small pool of conspirators..

But you can see it soon enough when the IG report comes out. even Fake News can't ignore that hot mess

I'm not wrong. This is 9/11 truther stuff. Like I said - the gov't can't do anything w/out major leaks.

There is no Deep State. Sorry. It's just paranoid fabrication - and irrational.
 
What do you mean, "buy into?" They acted unethically & were dealt with. That isn't systemic corruption, and it's incredibly irresponsible for you, Fox & Trump to portray it that way.
it most certainly IS systemic at the leadership positions. and no they wern't "dealt with" only Mccabe so far.

The IG report should be enlightening for you
 
I'm not wrong. This is 9/11 truther stuff. Like I said - the gov't can't do anything w/out major leaks.

There is no Deep State. Sorry. It's just paranoid fabrication - and irrational.
uh huh..you don't even get the idea of a leadership cabal capable of weaponizing intelligence .
Maybe you should watch more Adam Schiff -he''s clue you in! lol
 
I'm not wrong. This is 9/11 truther stuff. Like I said - the gov't can't do anything w/out major leaks.

There is no Deep State. Sorry. It's just paranoid fabrication - and irrational.

Yep.. Deep State is yet another Trump conspiracy fantasy.
 
uh huh..you don't even get the idea of a leadership cabal capable of weaponizing intelligence .
Maybe you should watch more Adam Schiff -he''s clue you in! lol

Nah. I don't buy into paranoid conspiracy theories - whether it's JFK, 9/11 trutherism or the Deep State. I'm rational.

Trump loves that stuff, though. He's kind of a conspiracy-theory nut.
 
Peters loved this map.

new-middle-east.jpg
 
Hello kudzu,

Retired Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, a longtime analyst for Fox News, told colleagues he is done with the network he says has become "a propaganda machine" for President Trump.

Peters said in an email first reported Tuesday by BuzzFeed that he chose not to renew his contract as a paid contributor with Fox News on March 1 because he was "ashamed" of the network.

He said the 21st Century Fox-owned cable channel has gone from being a valuable conservative voice to "assaulting our constitutional order and the rule of law, while fostering corrosive and unjustified paranoia among viewers."

Peters' comments directly targeted the network's opinions hosts — which include Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham — for their consistent attacks on special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's investigation into Russia's interference with the 2016 presidential election. Mueller is also looking into whether Trump obstructed justice when he fired James B. Comey from his post as FBI director.

"When prime-time hosts — who have never served our country in any capacity — dismiss facts and empirical reality to launch profoundly dishonest assaults on the FBI, the Justice Department, the courts, the intelligence community (in which I served) and, not least, a model public servant and genuine war hero such as Robert Mueller — all the while scaremongering with lurid warnings of 'deep-state' machinations — I cannot be part of the same organization, even at a remove," Peters wrote. "To me, Fox News is now wittingly harming our system of government for profit."

Peters' missive is the second time in a week Fox News' top-rated conservative opinion hosts have been subjected to internal criticism. While not nearly as harsh, Fox News anchor Shepard Smith said in an interview with Time magazine that some of the network's opinion programming "is there strictly to be entertaining," which led to some blowback from Hannity and Ingraham on social media. (Hannity called Smith "clueless" about the reporting done on his program).

But Peters' remarks are noteworthy because as a Fox News national security analyst for 10 years, he has been a foreign policy hawk who frequently criticized the Obama administration. He was once suspended from the network for a week in 2015 after an appearance on the Fox Business Network in which he used a vulgar term to describe former President Obama's fortitude in combating terrorism by Islamic extremists.

Peters' email notes that his condemnation of Fox News does not include the hard news reporters at the operation whom he called "talented professionals in a poisoned environment." He also excluded the Fox Business Network, "where numerous hosts retain a respect for facts and maintain a measure of integrity."

A Fox News representative did not comment on Peters' contract but defended its on-air talent.

"Ralph Peters is entitled to his opinion despite the fact that he's choosing to use it as a weapon in order to gain attention," the network said in a statement. "We are extremely proud of our top-rated prime-time hosts and all of our opinion programming."

http://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-peters-fox-20180320-story.html

Great Topic..

And shame on Fox News.

Right on Peters!
 
What do you mean, "buy into?" They acted unethically & were dealt with. That isn't systemic corruption, and it's incredibly irresponsible for you, Fox & Trump to portray it that way.
No, it’s not “systemic” corruption, it’s at the top, where the decisions are made. Something is going on in that particular part of the swamp, and it needs to be addressed
 
Nah. I don't buy into paranoid conspiracy theories - whether it's JFK, 9/11 trutherism or the Deep State. I'm rational.

Trump loves that stuff, though. He's kind of a conspiracy-theory nut.
tell it to Horowitz..if you had been watching FOX you would know this..but he'll release soon enough
 
Wasn't Horowitz report announced in early February? I haven't seen it..
it was due out this month. It's being delayed ( rumor) because it's being used to draw up indictments ( may or may not be true) we need it out there, but it's supposed to cover 2.2million docs, and could take another few weeks
 
it was due out this month. It's being delayed ( rumor) because it's being used to draw up indictments ( may or may not be true) we need it out there, but it's supposed to cover 2.2million docs, and could take another few weeks

I can't wait.

Horowitz announced in January 2017 that the Inspector General's office would examine evidence related to "allegations of misconduct" regarding FBI Director James B. Comey's handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email practices and whether Justice Department employees leaked information improperly during the run-up to the 2016 United States presidential election.
 
This really calls for a special counsel - constituted because of conflicts of interest in DoJ -which is not the case by Mueller who has a bad history of prosecutorial over-reach. That should have been a DoJ Inquiry.

But at this point ANY LIGHT shown on the Deep State cockroaches should be helpful in seeing malfeasement
 
Back
Top