And wrong again, this getting to be a habit with you, and the 2000 short form has only six questions
https://www.census.gov/dmd/www/pdf/d61a.pdf
"2020 Census Will Ask About Respondents' Citizenship Status"
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
And wrong again, this getting to be a habit with you, and the 2000 short form has only six questions
https://www.census.gov/dmd/www/pdf/d61a.pdf
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
well if we count them we should also have them tell us what country they came from so we can add them to their census and subtract them from ours......because they simply aren't American persons and should not be included in the American census..........
On THE actual census form to determine population, no
https://www.census.gov/dmd/www/pdf/d61a.pdf
Next
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
/brillig........must have been some sort of living constitution before it became a zombie constitution.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I expect this should be looked at like automatic weapons.......the founding fathers didn't contemplate a future in which demmycrats didn't give a fuck about deporting people who were here illegally......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Pure Michigan should advertise free vacations along the Lake Michigan coastline to any one in the world who fills out a census form.........According to idiots like Archcriesalot, why yes, Montana could increase its representation if the timing was right.
You know you are doing something right to DRAIN THE SWAMP when the little leftist bitches come out bitching in full force. Priceless. Guess what? If the US GOVERNMENT had the right to ask the question about citizenship in 1950...that right still exists. Truth does not evolve with age. Elections have consequences. You can sue to hell and back....but dollars to a doughnut.....the question will be included on the census form as the deadline is just days away. How many conservative judges have been appointed since the election......how many left wing seats on the court have been lost?
There is only one valid reason that any state would show concern about this question. They have been using ILLEGAL IMMIGRATS in some form or another to game the Federal Government whether its issuing illegal IDs to illegals so they can vote....or including them in order to rig a Congressional seats and get more votes....to game the Federal Government out of funds paid by ALL THE OTHER STATES because these liberal states cannot exist on their own TAX PAYER MONIES. Its not rocket science.
There is only one valid reason that any state would show concern about this question. They have been using ILLEGAL IMMIGRATS in some form or another to game the Federal Government whether its issuing illegal IDs to illegals so they can vote....or including them in order to rig a Congressional seats and get more votes....to game the Federal Government out of funds paid by ALL THE OTHER STATES because these liberal states cannot exist on their own TAX PAYER MONIES. Its not rocket science.
Last edited:
You must follow the same Constitution "truthie" follows, now is the the Beck version or is there another demogogue out there preaching another?
The "right" to separate people by sex and race was legal back in 1950, does that mean it is still a "right" today?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I would not be surprised.......we were both right.........
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
why do we make them move here........why not just make all Russians New Yorkers and add a hundred million people to the census for NYC?.......
According to idiots like Archcriesalot, why yes, Montana could increase its representation if the timing was right.
Well for simple minded people as yourself and "pp" that would mean those same people wouldn't be counted someplace else, like that happens all the time
Ain't seem that happening yet, but conservatives are famous for creating their own illusionary reality, so it probably is possible in your understanding
Apple/orange? Really? Its a simple thing.....just show us the law that makes it ILLEGAL? Its called precedent. And to mention SEPARATE/SEGREGATE PEOPLE by sex, race...etc.? What are you doing now? You are attempting to segregate (wink, wink) certain individuals from the others in the US by declaring them SPECIAL because of how they may or may not address the valid question? How many US CITIZENS are actually in the United States of America. And just how was the people separated by that question in 1950? The government does not possess the right to actually count US CITIZENS...but you have the right to separate ILLEGAL ALIENS by omitting certain questions that no US CITIZEN would find problematic?
FYI: If the question was indeed ILLEGAL why was it used in other US GOVERMENT questioner forms......all the way up to 2010?
Last edited:
That is a good point.
Cancel 2018.1
New member
Still don't see what the big deal is. Lie if you're concerned about the correct answer.
No one said illegal, just not necessary, if you want an accurate count of people living in the US you make it short and easy, your counting heads to obtain a total number
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I get it......instead of saying illegal aliens we just say not necessary aliens......
Just like "PP" to jump in completely off topic and attempt another shot at wit, keep telling you, it ain't in you, conservatives can't be witty, more than often it just comes across as corny
PP try harder. The census is supposed to count all PERSONS. Do you think those who are waiting to become citizens, not persons? Are those brought over like DACA kids, not persons? Are those here illegally to work, not persons? If you want your bigoted hateful opinion to be law, then change the census requirements. Until then, the census should do the job, as mandated,