House Intelligence : no collusion

PostmodernProphet said:
I suggest you reread the threads on this board started between March, 2017 and October, 2017........around half of them were started by lib'ruls claiming collusion was a crime and that Trump would be impeached by December, 2017.......Leon, who thanked your post started dozens of them himself.....
Click to expand...

Not just impeached, but tried for treason.
 
mak2 said:
I never recall anyone besides the conservatives saying collusion was a crime. Obstruction is though.
Click to expand...

It was always a weak case because Comey deserved to be fired and because of Trumps authority under Article II.

And that was before Mueller’s star witness went on a book tour lol. Huge no-no. In fact, Mueller may have told Comey there was nothing there, anyway, and gave him the Green Light.

If not, I doubt the two men are on speaking terms.
 
Comey didn't know Clinton paid for the Steele dossier!! yet he swears by it for a FISA????
and he briefs Trump on it?? WTF?
 
Fact is the house refused to interview a lot of people the Dems wanted to talk to, like Papadopolous, Flynn and Manafort. This was a Republican white wash. Nunes is just an example of how hard the Repubs fought to protect Trump.
 
Yaya said:
December Surprise!

You guys were so positive there was collusion and now we see there wasn't, so you losers immediately switch to something else.

LMAO
Click to expand...
are you people joking , remember we watched your witch hunt with 7 committees about Clinton, do you think you can get a reasonable person to believe that a conservative group found scum bag guilty of everything. The right is holding on for dear life with non stop lies , in fact without lies and distortions the hate party wouldn't have existed for the last three decades.
 
Phantasmal said:
I’m thinking if there was really anything to it, they would have been all over it by now. Rosenstein would gladly do it to appease Trump, but like Sessions said, there has to be evidence.
Click to expand...

Fair point, but then again there has been no evidence of collusion and I believe you believe there was collusion. I think most liberals believe that bases on nothing.

These guys are IC big wigs and know how to hide stuff, not a far stretch for them to cover this up as best they can.

Further, I believe you've said we don't know what Mueller has, so how do you know what sessions or rosen stein knows?
 
jbander1 said:
are you people joking , remember we watched your witch hunt with 7 committees about Clinton, do you think you can get a reasonable person to believe that a conservative group found scum bag guilty of everything. The right is holding on for dear life with non stop lies , in fact without lies and distortions the hate party wouldn't have existed for the last three decades.
Click to expand...

Those weren't my witch hunts.

Dismissed.
 
Yaya said:
Obviously, they got to secretly investigate him [Trump] like no other candidate.
Click to expand...

What would be the point of secretly investigating him without ever leaking anything, even the fact that they were investigating him?

The MSM ("propaganda arm of the DNC") wouldn't print anything about the Steele dossier before the election because they couldn't verify it.

If there was a conspiracy to stop Trump, it doesn't make sense.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
What would be the point of secretly investigating him without ever leaking anything, even the fact that they were investigating him?

The MSM ("propaganda arm of the DNC") wouldn't print anything about the Steele dossier before the election because they couldn't verify it.

If there was a conspiracy to stop Trump, it doesn't make sense.
Click to expand...

Why didn't Comey admit the dossier was paid for by Clinton?
 
Yaya said:
Why didn't Comey admit the dossier was paid for by Clinton?
Click to expand...

Why, why, why, it's all why, why, why

As I summed it up yesterday, we've lived thru Uranium One, Fusion GPS, Deep State, Steele dossier, Clinton Foundation, FBI Conspiracy, Clinton Emails, Clinton server, Seth Rich, McCabe, Grassley/Graham letter, secret societies, Strzok + Page, POTUS wants to know everything, Comey, Nunnes memos, FISA wardens, and before all that we had seven years of BenghaziGate

It's like whacking a mole
 
"Why didn't Comey admit the dossier was paid for by Clinton?"


That was AFTER the election, and Comey told Trump it had been paid for by his political opponents.

Do you think that "Clinton", or the DNC, knew what was in the dossier before the election? Then why did they make absolutely no use of it?
 
Nordberg said:
Fact is the house refused to interview a lot of people the Dems wanted to talk to, like Papadopolous, Flynn and Manafort. This was a Republican white wash. Nunes is just an example of how hard the Repubs fought to protect Trump.
Click to expand...

I just heard the entire House investigation referred to as a “dumpster fire”. Made me chuckle.

It was a joke from the get go.
 
Yaya said:
Your opinion is not fact.

Next
Click to expand...

That is what the minority members said. Thanks for proving again, what little you know and how right wing you are. They have been bitching about the Nunes and Repub blocking a real investigation for a long time. What, Infowars didn't cover it?
 
archives said:
Why, why, why, it's all why, why, why

As I summed it up yesterday, we've lived thru Uranium One, Fusion GPS, Deep State, Steele dossier, Clinton Foundation, FBI Conspiracy, Clinton Emails, Clinton server, Seth Rich, McCabe, Grassley/Graham letter, secret societies, Strzok + Page, POTUS wants to know everything, Comey, Nunnes memos, FISA wardens, and before all that we had seven years of BenghaziGate

It's like whacking a mole
Click to expand...

They can't defend Trump so they deflect attention away with their constant stream of "why why why why why..."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top