good jokes from correspondents dinner....

There has never been this level of vitriol towards any president, these "comedians" are fucking disgusting.

Imagine if the following was said about Obama's chimp daughters:

“She [Ivanka Trump] was supposed to be an advocate for women, but it turns out she’s about as helpful to women as an empty box of tampons. She’s done nothing to satisfy women. So I guess, like father like daughter.”
So you are just as vile as Gonad, and then some!!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
I ain't defending him for squat. But, have you actually read 12b? If you have, you'll see that the post you are referring to didn't violate the rule.
Have I read 12b? That's funny, it's good to have a laugh first thing in the morning!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
He just committed a 12b, so he's toast!

The post you are referring to...

The nigger monkeys Malia and Sasha should be hung along with their Tranny father "Michelle" and the literal cock sucker faggot nigger Obama.

Rule 12b ( https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?2-Rules-of-the-Board!&p=2#post2 )...

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

I'm pretty sure that posters comment didn't have anything to do with sexual comments relating to minors.
 
No, that's not the post I was referring to, do pay attention, this is the post in question!!

You didn't cite that post. You quoted that Christie bitches post ( https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...m-correspondents-dinner&p=2346041#post2346041 ) that was replying to Keks post that I quoted in post #156. If you want me to "pay attention", perhaps you should clue others in at that you're paying attention to. Ever think of doing that? And, BTW... your claim is questionable about that post. If you were referring to the post I quoted in post #156, that was and still is cut-and-dried not a violation to rule 12b.
 
You didn't cite that post. You quoted that Christie bitches post ( https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...m-correspondents-dinner&p=2346041#post2346041 ) that was replying to Keks post that I quoted in post #156. If you want me to "pay attention", perhaps you should clue others in at that you're paying attention to. Ever think of doing that? And, BTW... your claim is questionable about that post. If you were referring to the post I quoted in post #156, that was and still is cut-and-dried not a violation to rule 12b.
See post 139, and then shut up!!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top