Trump cuts 60 million from PP

Jack said:
Margaret Sanger "What Every Girl Should Know'.
I just found out she was against masturbation. I wonder what she would say if she were present today and saw all the masturbation devices in the Sex Shops?
Click to expand...

There's a cable direct tv channel hosted by a hot looking female doctor that is devoted entirely to female masturbation devices. She comments on their qualities and how to use them too. It's even too kinky for me to watch. It makes me blush. There are some things I just don't want to know about.:palm:

:awkward:
 
Oracle Of Delphi said:
There's a cable direct tv channel hosted by a hot looking female doctor that is devoted entirely to female masturbation devices. She comments on their qualities and how to use them too. It's even too kinky for me to watch. It makes me blush. There are some things I just don't want to know about.:palm:

:awkward:
Click to expand...

It was quite interesting reading Margaret Sanger and her 'What Every Girl Needs To Know'. It must have been a hundred years ago. The Post Office forbid this to go through the mail. It was a short essay, to the point, straightforward and probably a godsend to the working class girls she seemed to be talking to. Such a pioneer. I was amazed that she abhorred masturbation. Also, that she thought women should marry at 23 and men at 25. According to her, 80% of the people in New York City had gonorrhea, a real debilitating disease at the time.

Uh ... what channel did you say the hot chick with the vibrator was on?
 
She sounds like a real sexpert

Jack said:
It was quite interesting reading Margaret Sanger and her 'What Every Girl Needs To Know'. It must have been a hundred years ago. The Post Office forbid this to go through the mail. It was a short essay, to the point, straightforward and probably a godsend to the working class girls she seemed to be talking to. Such a pioneer. I was amazed that she abhorred masturbation. Also, that she thought women should marry at 23 and men at 25. According to her, 80% of the people in New York City had gonorrhea, a real debilitating disease at the time.

Uh ... what channel did you say the hot chick with the vibrator was on?
Click to expand...

As sarah sanders would say, I'll get back with that later. I'm not watching tv right now. ;)
 
The Wokest said:
The federal government is not the personal fiefdom of the party that controls it, it shouldn't abuse it's part to favor the party.
Click to expand...
Congress passes legislation to separate abortion from family planning services
http://thehill.com/opinion/healthca...tle-x-funding-protected-from-abortion-clinics
Section 1008 of the Act, passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, ensures that no taxpayer dollars be “used in programs where abortion is a method of family planning.” It was not until 1988 that the Reagan administration issued “co-location” guidelines. These guidelines were intended to further protect taxpayers from being complicit with the destruction of abortion. They were challenged in court and the Supreme Court ruled in 1991 that the regulations are permissible. However, a few years later President Bill Clinton, a supporter of abortion, removed those same protections.
Click to expand...
 
Havana Moon said:
They give long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) to poor women in the Third World and in Europe. So why can't they do the same in the US?
Click to expand...

Because the US govt is rat-infested with right-wing Repugnant Party scumbags who hate poor people and who you side with and shill for around here.
 
kudzu said:
What a shame...
Click to expand...

Don't look it that way. Look at it as an opportunity for YOU to prove you actually care about the things that PP provides to people who would otherwise not get it. Now you have a chance to offset the costs for women who say what they do with their body is their choice. If what they do with their body is their choice, why are taxpayers expected to pay for it. If it's her choice, shouldn't she pay or people like you that think she should get the help?
 
Nomad said:
Because the US govt is rat-infested with right-wing Repugnant Party scumbags who hate poor people and who you side with and shill for around here.
Click to expand...

It's not that. Women constantly claim that what they do with their bodies is their choice yet many of them also constantly demand taxpayers fund things related to that choice. If it's their choice, why do they expect someone else they've told to butt out to fund things for them?
 
I Love America said:
Let Scammed Parenthood fund itself
Click to expand...

I'm trying to figure out why all the left wingers are mad. Doesn't this give them the opportunity to personally fund something they claim is so badly needed? I thought they cared about the people they say benefit from PP. Perhaps they only cared about taking credit for claiming to care while supporting the government taxing someone else to pay for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top