Sarah Sanders, Raj Shah planning to depart the White House

Threedee said:
You claimed that only leftists support vulgarity. I reminder you that Trump supporters always approved of his vulgar attacks on people.
Click to expand...

I never said anything about a “conservative against Trump” thinking something he said, or did, was vulgar or not. In point of fact, I attempted to answer your question by clarifying that vulgarity was only off limits if you supported Trump. Comprehension much? The rank hypocrisy is the false outrage OVER Trumps comments, or Trump supporters comments. It’s false because those who decry it hav carried water and excused much worse from among their own rank and file. The feckless cunt comment towards Ivanka Trump, serves as the most recent prof of this.


I know plenty of Trump supporters who dislike his getting personal in his criticisms. Myself and others I know- don’t see that as a reason to not vote for him. Obama got personal all the time- not as crudely as Trump, but derisive nonetheless. His highbrow brand of arrogance didn’t pass the smell test any better than Trump’s pugnacious brand does.


I wasn’t a populist, until my party stopped doing their job. The best thing my party has done in a long while, is to elect a populist. I never thought anything about Megyn Kelly. When I voted, other than wanting an economic recovery, I wanted a president who would listen to the people who elected him. I believe the facts are evident that Trump is successfully accomplishing his duties as president.


I have zero issue with anyone calling vulgarity out , no matter the political persuasion of the perpetrator. My post to the albino cat was to illuminate his willingness to be vulgar, but likewise attack Trump or any conservative on vulgarity. It’s the hypocrisy that I have called out. The lefts willingness to use vulgarity, to applaud it even. So long that is, it’s directed at Trump- and before him Bush.


YOU
“Is vulgarity bad?”


ME
“Only if you’re a conservative who supports our current president. Then being vulgar is terrible and shocking- if your politics are left of center however, then vulgarity it’s always ok, or at least understandable.”


YOU
“So, if you're a conservative who opposed Trump in the primary, you thought Trump's vile attack on Megyn Kelly was bad, but if you are a populist who supported him, you thought it was just putting a woman in her place?”


ME
“No, that’s not what I said.”


YOU
“You claimed that only leftists support vulgarity. I reminder you that Trump supporters always approved of his vulgar attacks on people.”
 
images
 
J Craft said:
I never said anything about a “conservative against Trump” thinking something he said, or did, was vulgar or not. In point of fact, I attempted to answer your question by clarifying that vulgarity was only off limits if you supported Trump. Comprehension much? The rank hypocrisy is the false outrage OVER Trumps comments, or Trump supporters comments. It’s false because those who decry it hav carried water and excused much worse from among their own rank and file. The feckless cunt comment towards Ivanka Trump, serves as the most recent prof of this.


I know plenty of Trump supporters who dislike his getting personal in his criticisms. Myself and others I know- don’t see that as a reason to not vote for him. Obama got personal all the time- not as crudely as Trump, but derisive nonetheless. His highbrow brand of arrogance didn’t pass the smell test any better than Trump’s pugnacious brand does.


I wasn’t a populist, until my party stopped doing their job. The best thing my party has done in a long while, is to elect a populist. I never thought anything about Megyn Kelly. When I voted, other than wanting an economic recovery, I wanted a president who would listen to the people who elected him. I believe the facts are evident that Trump is successfully accomplishing his duties as president.


I have zero issue with anyone calling vulgarity out , no matter the political persuasion of the perpetrator. My post to the albino cat was to illuminate his willingness to be vulgar, but likewise attack Trump or any conservative on vulgarity. It’s the hypocrisy that I have called out. The lefts willingness to use vulgarity, to applaud it even. So long that is, it’s directed at Trump- and before him Bush.


YOU
“Is vulgarity bad?”


ME
“Only if you’re a conservative who supports our current president. Then being vulgar is terrible and shocking- if your politics are left of center however, then vulgarity it’s always ok, or at least understandable.”


YOU
“So, if you're a conservative who opposed Trump in the primary, you thought Trump's vile attack on Megyn Kelly was bad, but if you are a populist who supported him, you thought it was just putting a woman in her place?”


ME
“No, that’s not what I said.”


YOU
“You claimed that only leftists support vulgarity. I reminder you that Trump supporters always approved of his vulgar attacks on people.”
Click to expand...

I don't believe the Trump supporters who occasion to dismiss his constant vulgarity as bad. If they really believed their muted condemnation, then they wouldn't have nominated him to begin with. The vulgarity is precisely what got him nominated.
 
Threedee said:
I don't believe the Trump supporters who occasion to dismiss his constant vulgarity as bad. If they really believed their muted condemnation, then they wouldn't have nominated him to begin with. The vulgarity is precisely what got him nominated.
Click to expand...

You have a poll where this was tested? No? I thought not. What got him elected was his conservative message on the economy and the border. Everyone I know, who voted for him, were not fans of much of his personal attacks.
 
J Craft said:
You have a poll where this was tested? No? I thought not. What got him elected was his conservative message on the economy and the border. Everyone I know who voted for him were not fans of much of his personal attacks.
Click to expand...

If they were really conservative, his character would have mattered to them. And they would not have liked his stance on trade.
 
Threedee said:
If they were really conservative, his character would have mattered to them. And they would not have liked his stance on trade.
Click to expand...

Oh BS! Economic conservatism has nothing to do with playing nice in the public square.

Trump knew what he was up against. He used leftist tactics against them. As to his life as a private citizen- OMG imagine a billionaire playboy had a racey past- will wonders never cease?
 
Kacper said:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...planning-to-depart-the-white-house/ar-AAyBNSZ

Two of the most visible members of the Trump administration are planning their departures, the latest sign of upheaval in a White House marked by turmoil.

Press secretary Sarah Sanders and principal deputy press secretary Raj Shah are both heading for the exits, according to sources inside the White House and close to the administration. Sanders, who has become a confidante of President Trump since the departure of former communications director Hope Hicks, has told friends that she plans to leave the administration at the end of the year.

Shah is also considering his exit, but he has not yet settled on an exact date.

_________________________________

^^Exact quote from article should msn decide to alter the story like they did with the whole "Narrow Victory" cake baker decision and people with nothing substantive to contribute go down the "THAT IS NOT WHAT THE ARTICLE SAID" road again.
Click to expand...

Good, get that lying, point/fact dodging hired lying cunt backed off the podium. She can go push evil Jesus with her daddie.
 
Threedee said:
I don't believe the Trump supporters who occasion to dismiss his constant vulgarity as bad. If they really believed their muted condemnation, then they wouldn't have nominated him to begin with. The vulgarity is precisely what got him nominated.
Click to expand...
talk is cheap..we're done with smooth talking do nothings,or stuttering fools like Bush who drag us into wars
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top