How to handle confrontational liberals.

DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
^Struggles with three letter words.
Click to expand...

Think so, DEMOCRAT?

Struggle with this:

CODE OF VIRGINIA

DISORDERLY CONDUCT IN PUBLIC PLACES (§ 18.2-415)

A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with the intent to cause public
inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he:

A. In any street, highway, public building, or while in or on a public
conveyance, or public place engages in conduct having a direct tendency to
cause acts of violence by the person or persons at whom, individually, such
conduct is directed; or

B. Willfully or being intoxicated, whether willfully or not, and whether such
intoxication results from self-administered alcohol or other drug of whatever
nature, disrupts any funeral, memorial service, or meeting of the governing
body of any political subdivision of this Commonwealth or a division or agency
thereof, or of any school, literary society or place of religious worship, if
the disruption (i) prevents or interferes with the orderly conduct of the
funeral, memorial service, or meeting or (ii) has a direct tendency to cause
acts of violence by the person or persons at whom, individually, the
disruption is directed; or

C. Willfully or while intoxicated, whether willfully or not, and whether such
intoxication results from self-administered alcohol or other drug of whatever
nature, disrupts the operation of any school or any activity conducted or
sponsored by any school, if the disruption (i) prevents or interferes with the
orderly conduct of the operation or activity or (ii) has a direct tendency to
cause acts of violence by the person or persons at whom, individually, the
disruption is directed.

However, the conduct prohibited under subdivision A, B or C of this section
shall not be deemed to include the utterance or display of any words or to
include conduct otherwise made punishable under this title.The person in charge
of any such building, place, conveyance, meeting, operation or activity may
eject therefrom any person who violates any provision of this section, with the
aid, if necessary, of any persons who may be called upon for such purpose.The
governing bodies of counties, cities and towns are authorized to adopt
ordinances prohibiting and punishing the acts and conduct prohibited by this
section, provided that the punishment fixed therefor shall not exceed that
prescribed for a Class 1 misdemeanor. A person violating any provision of this
section shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

HISTORY: Code 1950, §§ 18.1-239, 18.1-240, 18.1-253.1 through 18.1-253.3;
1960, c. 358; 1968, c. 639; 1969, Ex. Sess., c. 2; 1970, c. 374; 1975, cc. 14,
15; 1976, c. 244; 1990, c. 627; 2006, c. 250.

https://vacode.org/18.2-415.txt

Loser.

:rofl2:
 

"In the fevered state of our country, no good can ever result from any attempt to set one of these fiery zealots to rights, either in fact or principle. They are determined as to the facts they will believe, and the opinions on which they will act. Get by them, therefore, as you would by an angry bull; it is not for a man of sense to dispute the road with such an animal."
Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), U.S. president. Letter, 24 Nov. 1808, to his grandson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph.
 
Legion said:
Scared, DEMOCRAT?

DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! - DEMOCRAT Domer: I know I'm safe. I OWN A REALLY BIG GUN! -

Loser.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

:lolup:

Pitiable little illiterate stalker. Just like a little puppy dog, following people around the forum.

See how I used the word "or"? I said "blowing them up" OR "shooting the inhabitants". With your limited vocabulary ""blowing them up" AND "shooting the inhabitants", means the same thing.

lol
 
Legion said:
Think so, DEMOCRAT?

Struggle with this:

CODE OF VIRGINIA

DISORDERLY CONDUCT IN PUBLIC PLACES (§ 18.2-415)

A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with the intent to cause public
inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he:

A. In any street, highway, public building, or while in or on a public
conveyance, or public place engages in conduct having a direct tendency to
cause acts of violence by the person or persons at whom, individually, such
conduct is directed; or

B. Willfully or being intoxicated, whether willfully or not, and whether such
intoxication results from self-administered alcohol or other drug of whatever
nature, disrupts any funeral, memorial service, or meeting of the governing
body of any political subdivision of this Commonwealth or a division or agency
thereof, or of any school, literary society or place of religious worship, if
the disruption (i) prevents or interferes with the orderly conduct of the
funeral, memorial service, or meeting or (ii) has a direct tendency to cause
acts of violence by the person or persons at whom, individually, the
disruption is directed; or

C. Willfully or while intoxicated, whether willfully or not, and whether such
intoxication results from self-administered alcohol or other drug of whatever
nature, disrupts the operation of any school or any activity conducted or
sponsored by any school, if the disruption (i) prevents or interferes with the
orderly conduct of the operation or activity or (ii) has a direct tendency to
cause acts of violence by the person or persons at whom, individually, the
disruption is directed.

However, the conduct prohibited under subdivision A, B or C of this section
shall not be deemed to include the utterance or display of any words or to
include conduct otherwise made punishable under this title.The person in charge
of any such building, place, conveyance, meeting, operation or activity may
eject therefrom any person who violates any provision of this section, with the
aid, if necessary, of any persons who may be called upon for such purpose.The
governing bodies of counties, cities and towns are authorized to adopt
ordinances prohibiting and punishing the acts and conduct prohibited by this
section, provided that the punishment fixed therefor shall not exceed that
prescribed for a Class 1 misdemeanor. A person violating any provision of this
section shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

HISTORY: Code 1950, §§ 18.1-239, 18.1-240, 18.1-253.1 through 18.1-253.3;
1960, c. 358; 1968, c. 639; 1969, Ex. Sess., c. 2; 1970, c. 374; 1975, cc. 14,
15; 1976, c. 244; 1990, c. 627; 2006, c. 250.

https://vacode.org/18.2-415.txt

Loser.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Yep, I see you changed your original wording from "and" to "or".

"A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with the intent to cause public
inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he:

Notice in the wording, dumbfuck, the use of the word "or". It means each element is independent and stands on its own.

Sad, illiterate dumbfuck. Providing proof of his own ignorance. Continuously.
 
DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
Post #225. You quoted me, shitstain. What's wrong, stalker? Can't keep up with whom you're stalking these days?
Click to expand...

I quoted you so Rune could see the context, DEMOCRAT. I was responding to him. Let's see if you're not too senescent to follow the conversation.

domer76 said:
They just wailed on them at Trump rallies. Or killed them, as at Charlottesville.
Click to expand...

Rune said:
At the Donald's direction.
Click to expand...

Legion said:
Really? Trump told James Alex Fields Junior to kill hefty heifer Heather?
Click to expand...

Rune said:
No, but he instructed attendees to beat protesters.
Click to expand...

Legion said:
Looks like you said that Trump directed James Alex Fields Junior to kill hefty heifer Heather and directed attendees to "wail" on "them" at Trump rallies to me.
Click to expand...

You struggle with following dialog, don't you?

Loser.

:rofl2:
 
DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
See how I used the word "or"? I said "blowing them up" OR "shooting the inhabitants". With your limited vocabulary ""blowing them up" AND "shooting the inhabitants", means the same thing.
Click to expand...

Think so, DEMOCRAT?

Link to a quote of mine stating that "and" and "or" mean the same thing.

I'll understand if you can't.

Loser.

:rofl2:
 
Legion said:
I quoted you so Rune could see the context, DEMOCRAT. I was responding to him. Let's see if you're not too senescent to follow the conversation.











You struggle with following dialog, don't you?

Loser.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

You are very judgemental, reserving for yourself only, the benefit of the doubt.
Perhaps if you take this knowledge in, you may affect enough change in your personality as to be a worthy and deserving friend.
You are young, there is still hope.
 
Bourbon said:
The best way to Confront a Liberal, is to Log Off the Internet and handle your business like a Man. ;)
Click to expand...

Irony.

giphy.gif
 
mak2 said:
Snowflake. IF you need a safe space I believe I have read on Fox "them" people have safe spaces on college campuses. Maybe they will let you borrow one.
Click to expand...

So you're okay with the harassment of government officials one disagrees with politically? I just want to get all you hypocrites on the record when it's the Democrats being chased down and harassed with Fascist get-in-your face tactics.
 
I know this is kinda deep and nuanced, but obviously I am pointing out the hypocrisy of the RWers by getting all worked up when one of them wants a safe spot, yet conservobots makes fun of college kids when they do. I try to keep things concrete...
Truth Detector said:
So you're okay with the harassment of government officials one disagrees with politically? I just want to get all you hypocrites on the record when it's the Democrats being chased down and harassed with Fascist get-in-your face tactics.
Click to expand...
 
sear said:

"In the fevered state of our country, no good can ever result from any attempt to set one of these fiery zealots to rights, either in fact or principle. They are determined as to the facts they will believe, and the opinions on which they will act. Get by them, therefore, as you would by an angry bull; it is not for a man of sense to dispute the road with such an animal."
Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), U.S. president. Letter, 24 Nov. 1808, to his grandson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph.
Click to expand...

There is a principle that is a bar to all knowledge,
A proof against every argument,
And cannot fail to keep a man in Everlasting ignorance;
That principle is contempt prior to investigation.

Right out of the gate, you compare the rate of fire of the original Minute Men to that of a rifle our soldiers used over sixty years ago.
Not sure what that is about, but in the almost 70 years since the invention of the M-16, a massive quantity are held by citizens and are still very popular sellers today.

It seems you are implying that the modern unenrolled militia would be forced to use muzzleloaders.

I realize you know better, but the why mention the disparate rates of fire?

Finally, how can one describe an internet post as overly zealous?
You can determine tone from written words?
Most can't.
 
mak2 said:
I know this is kinda deep and nuanced, but obviously I am pointing out the hypocrisy of the RWers by getting all worked up when one of them wants a safe spot, yet conservobots makes fun of college kids when they do. I try to keep things concrete...
Click to expand...

I know this is beyond your comprehension level but the only thing you're illustrating is your ignorance and glaring hypocrisy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top