Yeah, but what Anatta and the right wing demogogues he heard it from didn't tell you is that the mythological "deep state" ain't made up of Obama holdovers, nor Democrats, nor never Trumpers, but rather people that Trump himself appointed, Trump's guys, the Trumpkins in the Administration are your "deep state," funny
Anatta was right - NYT confirms Deep State White House coup attempt is real
- Thread starter Bigdog
- Start date
Yeah, but what Anatta and the right wing demogogues he heard it from didn't tell you is that the mythological "deep state" ain't made up of Obama holdovers, nor Democrats, nor never Trumpers, but rather people that Trump himself appointed, Trump's guys, the Trumpkins in the Administration are your "deep state," funny
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
It is impossible to debate someone who is totally ignorant of the subject.
You don't know jackshit about history or military you blustering asshole.
The truth is that after Gulf War 1, Saddam was emasculated and presented no threat whatsoever.
What history has clearly shown is that when tin pot dictators and strongman are bombed by US they invariably lose their will to fight.
True, debating you is entirely pointless. Dopey
Old Trapper
Verified User
The gutless ones are those like yourself that believe the daily lies, and bull shit of Trump. He has fired no one that has been exposed save for his crowd of criminals. And here are a limited number of people who could be this "Deep Throat", so all he has to do is fire them all. Of course, that would not solve the problem of his mental deficiency, nor that of yours.
BTW stupid, it is your gawd Trump that praises the likes of Kim Jung un, not the socialists, or Democratic Socialists. Of course, the color orange is the color of Trump if you had a better quality TV.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Presidential Appointments with Senate Confirmation (PAS): There are 1,212 senior leaders, including the Cabinet secretaries and their deputies, the heads of most independent agencies and ambassadors, who must be confirmed by the Senate. These positions first require a Senate hearing in addition to background checks and other vetting.
http://presidentialtransition.org/blog/posts/160316_help-wanted-4000-appointees.php
_____________
And that’s not counting the number of ‘senior administration officials’ that don’t get rubber stamped by the Senate.
What’s that sound? Is that the air leaking out of something lol?
It would be a new experience for you to link your crap.
Regardless of what they do, they didn't do it and relied on Crowdstrike, which has been shown to be
tricked before on malware. I linked an article in this thread.
as to Guicifer 2.0 - I'm supposed to believe he forgot to turn on a VPN, masking his IP address?
This was supposedly Russian intelligence!
It's the same story with the Podesta Emails.
Russian phising led to the url infection, but they forgot to turn on their privacy settings?
Everytime we have this indisputable proof it always relies on really basic mistakes by supposed Russian intelligence
Strzok / Comey / Page /McCabe / Ohr et all are all Obama holdovers. Brennan / Clapper set it up
like who?
Saddam had a "will to fight" his army did not.
Are you including Qadafi here? he was a dictator and we had to bomb his army and drone his army to get him to die -he never quit fighting. so who is it you refer to here?
Time for the NYTimes to put up or shut up. They won't put it, and they won't shut up. Weasel News
They prefer anonymous editorials- incapable of being questioned
Deep State is the permanent bureaucracy that we saw, this alleged SES guy is "deep state ish" in practice.
floridafan
Verified User
You are more than welcome to question the NY Times article, but it wont change anything. It seems like the "Deep State" that you constantly whine about is made up of Republicans who work in the White House. Who woulda thought!
You are not quite familiar with that whole Deep State thing are you?
floridafan
Verified User
Familiar enough to know its a complete fairytale.
Then why bring one party into it?
The big chiwawa - "Anatta was right - NYT confirms Deep State White House coup attempt is real"
The big chiwawa ain't talking Strzok / Comey / Page /McCabe / Ohr, rather the recent NYT op ed authored by someone in the White House, a Trump appointee.
And the rest of your "deep state" mythology is pure innuendo fabricated by the right wing demogogues, when their guys own all the branches of Gov't, and Obama/Hillary are history, it ain't easy finding scapegoats, what works better than some mysterious amoebic entity
floridafan
Verified User
Seems like the info came from the White House so to play along with your deep state BS, it had to be Republicans.
So all 1,212 individuals working under the White House umbrella have direct access to what lies on the President's desk?
And what the Senate approves, which is controlled by Trump's party, was put before them by Trump himself, and is a rubber stamp function
Darth Omar
Russian asset
I guess it depends on which definition you want to use.
One of the reasons I typically avoid using the term is because I consider it a bit of a catchphrase. I usually just say ‘elements within the government’ and leave it at that. If there are people in Trump’s administration that are thwarting Trump’s agenda—as the NYT ghost writer claims, they qualify as a Deep State.
Take your NYT vindication and run with it lol.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That's a cop-out answer. C'mon- you can seriously do better than that.
You're trying to justify it admirably, but the plain fact is that one of the last NIE's before the war basically stated that Saddam wasn't even a threat to his immediate neighbors, much less an imminent threat to the U.S.