Anatta was right - NYT confirms Deep State White House coup attempt is real

[domer76]

You lost the election so all your hopes hang on Mullet.

Sad.

Rehashing the election seems to be the bailiwick of Orangetweet and you Trumpanzees. With the loss of the popular vote, I can understand your defensiveness.

All my hopes on Mueller? Hardly, dumbfuck. When his report comes out, I’ll accept it for what it is and move on. Unlike you fucking crybaby righties, I won’t insist on 7 more, ala Benghazi.

 

[Truth Detector]

They believed Bush's lies you fucking idiot

You fucking idiot, they weren't Bush's. You leftist morons must be retarded to keep repeating the same dumb lies over and over again as if you had the slightest clue of what you are erupting about.

Prove your bullshit or
Shut the fuck up loser.

Here you go fucking moron on steroids.

Previous administration saying the exact same things:

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing. He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators.""Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

Here's what Democrats said:

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"I mean, we have three different countries that, while they all present serious problems for the United States -- they're dictatorships, they're involved in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction -- you know, the most imminent, clear and present threat to our country is not the same from those three countries. I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country."
-- Sen. John Edwards (D, NC) Feb. 24, 2002

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power. We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." "
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed. We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Edward Kennedy (D, MA) Sep. 27, 2002

"Now let me be clear -- I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him."
-- State Senator Barack Obama (Democrat, Illinois) Oct. 2, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction."
-- Senator John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002

"We stopped the fighting [in 1991] on an agreement that Iraq would take steps to assure the world that it would not engage in further aggression and that it would destroy its weapons of mass destruction. It has refused to take those steps. That refusal constitutes a breach of the armistice which renders it void and justifies resumption of the armed conflict."
-- Sen. Harry Reid (D. NV) Oct. 9, 2002


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."
-- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D. CA) Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)

I asked very direct questions of the top people in the CIA and people who'd served in the Clinton administration. And they said they believed that Saddam Hussein either had weapons or had the components of weapons or the ability to quickly make weapons of mass destruction. What we're worried about is an A-bomb in a Ryder truck in New York, in Washington and St. Louis. It cannot happen. We have to prevent it from happening.
-- Rep. Richard Gephardt (D, MT) Nov. 2, 2003

 

[Darth Omar]

I finally read the stupid leftwing propaganda op ed.

It looks like it was written by a child ... and reiterates, in a child like way, the same old lefty memes we hear from the angry babies on State TV.

I think it was Jefferson who famously quipped that the newspapers of his day should be divided into three sections.

First page: truth

Second page: rumors

Third page: lies

Suffice to say the NYT Op Ed is page two or three material lol. Funny how things don’t change.

 

[Bigdog]

I think it was Jefferson who famously quipped that the newspapers of his day should be divided into three sections.

First page: truth

Second page: rumors

Third page: lies

Suffice to say the NYT Op Ed is page two or three material lol. Funny how things don’t change.

Nice quote.

Stylistically, the op ed could have been written by Comey. It has the feel of being engineered by someone like him.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

Nice quote.

Stylistically, the op ed could have been written by Comey. It has the feel of being engineered by someone like him.

Damn, all those moles talking to him.

 

[Darth Omar]

Nice quote.

Stylistically, the op ed could have been written by Comey. It has the feel of being engineered by someone like him.

It’s a good a guess as I’ve seen lol!

 

[Fentoine Lum]

I think it was Jefferson who famously quipped that the newspapers of his day should be divided into three sections.

First page: truth

Second page: rumors

Third page: lies

Suffice to say the NYT Op Ed is page two or three material lol. Funny how things don’t change.

Ours is all in the hands of half a dozen monopolistic corporations since Clinton deregulated the FCC.

 

[anatta]

You couldn’t come up with anything, could you lol.

What’s so bad about this president compared to the last two? Coming up on two years in office and no wars or even rumors of wars. No terrorist attacks. No more ISIS. The economy is booming. More people—including minorities, are working now than have in years if not decades.

How many wars or major foreign policy missteps happened under the last two presidents. How many have happened under this one? You care about Russian interference? That happened under the LAST president and he did—nothing, until Hillary lost the election.

So tell me again, why are people in such a hurry to remove this president from office? I can’t seem to get a handle on it

because they are partisan morons who lost their mind?
They aren't even rational..it's pure derangement

 

[kudzu]

Let me get this straight.

This newest effort to ‘stop Trump’ came at the cost of the NYT revealing that there is, in fact, a Deep State that is aligned against a duly elected president.

Comrade Anatta has indeed been vindicated lol.

Oh bull.. These people aren't "deep state" .. They are employees abused by Trump. Patriots afraid for America.

Matthis will be next to leave...

 

[anatta]

^ abused?
The Times publishes an anonymous editorial slamming Trump and the appointees are abused?

If they want to be patriots, then announce yourselves, and quit acting like quislings

 

[kudzu]

^ abused?
The Times publishes an anonymous editorial slamming Trump and the appointees are abused?

If they want to be patriots, then announce yourselves, and quit acting like quislings

Give them time... This isn't going away.. Trump is getting sicker.

 

[anatta]

Give them time... This isn't going away.. Trump is getting sicker.

why give them time?
Like I posted someplace before much of this reads to me like National Security Council give an take.
except for snatching memos of course. whomever it is a sleezeball coward

 

[kudzu]

why give them time?
Like I posted someplace before much of this reads to me like National Security Council give an take.
except for snatching memos of course. whomever it is a sleezeball coward

I hate to break it to you, but Trump is a sick man... and the people who have every reason to support him are afraid of him.

 

[anatta]

I hate to break it to you, but Trump is a sick man... and the people who have every reason to support him are afraid of him.

then trigger the 25th. this dishonorable hit job by an anonymous sources is banana republic crap.
It;s like impeachment by innuendo - the accuser should come forward

 

[kudzu]

then trigger the 25th. this dishonorable hit job by an anonymous sources is banana republic crap.
It;s like impeachment by innuendo - the accuser should come forward

Trump is a walking bananna republic. Meanwhile, he's claiming that if he is impeached, it will be the fault of his supporters.

 

[anatta]

Trump is a walking bananna republic. Meanwhile, he's claiming that if he is impeached, it will be the fault of his supporters.

Trump is a pussy cat.
He isn't about glomming more presidential powers -in fact he's always offered to work with the Dems.
I guess he got tired of holding out his hand only to get shat upon by da resistance .

The Dems are acting like wild children unable to work for the common good

 

[Darth Omar]

Oh bull.. These people aren't "deep state" .. They are employees abused by Trump. Patriots afraid for America.

Matthis will be next to leave...

If Trump presents a clear and present danger someone needs to step up to the plate instead of walking away from it or penning ‘suggestive’ opinion pieces for the NYT lol.

You’ve been sucked in, again. Do yourself a favor and start thinking critically.

 

[Darth Omar]

Trump is a pussy cat.
He isn't about glomming more presidential powers -in fact he's always offered to work with the Dems.
I guess he got tired of holding out his hand only to get shat upon by da resistance .

The Dems are acting like wild children unable to work for the common good

Trump just wants to get stuff done.

Whether it’s for his ego or because he really cares about the country is irrelevant. Why does anyone even care about that question so long as the country benefits? No one can answer it without getting into his head anyway. It’s a complete waste of time with me.

We’re on the verge of appointing the second originalist judge to SCOTUS. Even the Never Trumpers should be cheering. The economy is rocking. There’s not even a hint of war on the horizon. Trump has put a lid on the regime change madness. Why aren’t the lefties cheering? In fact, I look for Trump to get us out of Afghanistan before his first term is up.

Imagine what he could accomplish without Mullet or the incessant withering criticism—and conspiracy theories, from the media and the TDS afflicted.

 

[kudzu]

If Trump presents a clear and present danger someone needs to step up to the plate instead of walking away from it or penning ‘suggestive’ opinion pieces for the NYT lol.

You’ve been sucked in, again. Do yourself a favor and start thinking critically.

They will.. Give them time. Its human nature to be conflicted over a terrible situation like this.

 

[anatta]

Trump just wants to get stuff done.

Whether it’s for his ego or because he really cares about the country is irrelevant. Why does anyone even care about that question so long as the country benefits? No one can answer it without getting into his head anyway. It’s a complete waste of time with me.

We’re on the verge of appointing the second originalist judge to SCOTUS. Even the Never Trumpers should be cheering. The economy is rocking. There’s not even a hint of war on the horizon. Trump has put a lid on the regime change madness. Why aren’t the lefties cheering? In fact, I look for Trump to get us out of Afghanistan before his first term is up.

Imagine what he could accomplish without Mullet or the incessant withering criticism—and conspiracy theories, from the media and the TDS afflicted.

DC is a swamp. It sucks out all ambition except political aspirations.

we could have had so much done, and I would argue probably better legislation with a Democratic buy in.
But the children don't wanna play, they just wanna sling their poo

We’re on the verge of appointing the second originalist judge to SCOTUS. Even the Never Trumpers should be cheering. The economy is rocking. There’s not even a hint of war on the horizon. Trump has put the lid on the regime change madness. Why aren’t the lefties cheering?