Woodward Found No Evidence Of Collusion, Even Though He ‘Looked For It Hard’

[volsrock]

Veteran reporter Bob Woodward said Friday that he conducted a thorough investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion while researching his latest book, “Fear: Trump in the White House,” but found no evidence of a conspiracy.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/14/bob-woodward-trump-collusion/

This is it...lol

 

[Irish Exit]

Veteran reporter Bob Woodward said Friday that he conducted a thorough investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion while researching his latest book, “Fear: Trump in the White House,” but found no evidence of a conspiracy.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/14/bob-woodward-trump-collusion/

This is it...lol

Did he bother to check the clintonmail.com servers?

 

[jimmymccready]

tick tock

 

[Nomad]

Veteran reporter Bob Woodward said Friday that he conducted a thorough investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion while researching his latest book, “Fear: Trump in the White House,” but found no evidence of a conspiracy.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/14/bob-woodward-trump-collusion/

This is it...lol

There is certain information not even Woodward would be privy to.

 

[Darth Omar]

There is certain information not even Woodward would be privy to.

No, Woodward is the supposed WH fly on the wall.

Can you imagine trying to keep Russian collusion a secret in the WH lol? Face it, you’ve been had. Even Strzok said ‘there was no there, there’ and he was over the Russian investigation before Mullet took it over and turned it into an Inquisition.

 

[Nomad]

No, Woodward is the supposed WH fly on the wall.

Can you imagine trying to keep Russian collusion a secret in the WH lol? Face it, you’ve been had. Even Strzok said ‘there was no there, there’ and he was over the Russian investigation before Mullet took it over and turned it into an Inquisition.

Well, I haven't made any predictions about the outcome of the investigation and I'm not going to start now. But Woodward not finding any evidence doesn't mean much. Any backroom dealings with Russia would have been known by a very select few.

 

[mak2]

But everything else in the book is true.

 

[floridafan]

No, Woodward is the supposed WH fly on the wall.

Can you imagine trying to keep Russian collusion a secret in the WH lol? Face it, you’ve been had. Even Strzok said ‘there was no there, there’ and he was over the Russian investigation before Mullet took it over and turned it into an Inquisition.

White House staff were instructed not to speak with Woodward.

 

[Darth Omar]

White House staff were instructed not to speak with Woodward.

Do you mean to imply he made crap up lol?

 

[floridafan]

Do you mean to imply he made crap up lol?

Trump was afraid that someone on his staff would tell Woodward the truth.

 

[Darth Omar]

Trump was afraid that someone on his staff would tell Woodward the truth.

But Woodward found no collusion, and he looked hard lol.

 

[Nordberg]

Did he bother to check the clintonmail.com servers?

t he Repugs did about 50 times,. You guys ever get tired of doing that?

 

[floridafan]

But Woodward found no collusion, and he looked hard lol.

Lets say that Mueller finds no collusion, but does find a number of other crimes Trump committed. That would be OK with you?

 

[Darth Omar]

Lets say that Mueller finds no collusion, but does find a number of other crimes Trump committed. That would be OK with you?

Will it be OK with you if it comes out that collusion was just a pretext to get an SP after Trump?

 

[floridafan]

Will it be OK with you if it comes out that collusion was just a pretext to get an SP after Trump?

When you start an investigation you never knows where it ends. So if there are financial crimes, money laundering charges against Trump, you would be ok with an indictment? After all, crime is crime.

 

[Nordberg]

But Woodward found no collusion, and he looked hard lol.

I missed it when Mueller came out with his findings. what did he say about it? You must have facts, don't you? Otherwise noise making. Right-wing uninformed noise making.

 

[Darth Omar]

When you start an investigation you never knows where it ends. So if there are financial crimes, money laundering charges against Trump, you would be ok with an indictment? After all, crime is crime.

I’m definitely not OK with an investigation started by criminals.

 

[mak2]

Indeed, Trump was president when Mueller was appointed, wasn't he?

I’m definitely not OK with an investigation started by criminals.

 

[floridafan]

I’m definitely not OK with an investigation started by criminals.

You got it ass backwards, in that scenario, trump is the criminal. Is Robert Mueller a criminal in your mind?

 

[Darth Omar]

Indeed, Trump was president when Mueller was appointed, wasn't he?

Did Trump start the investigation? Did he leak supposedly secret FISA information to the media to stoke a narrative? Did Trump leak memos ‘with the hope that an SP would be appointed’ and then go on an open-ended crime search against himself?

I doubt you pray, but you’d better hope really hard that democrats take the House.