Why does it have to be the FBI?

Are you fucking on drugs or something?


Here is your post



I specifically asked you for an example of Fox and or talk radio being "insensitive and misogynistic" and all you could come with was you watched something on Full Frontal but refused to provide a link. Maybe you need the FBI to fully investigate first?

:dunno:

Ailes

O'riely
 
It's not a federal crime to lie to local PD; the penalties for lying to local PD vary depending on the jurisdiction and the prosecutor's discretion.

But in no regard is lying to a cop a felony.

So that's why the FBI needs to investigate.
 
so if she told people that would help prove her case.

What the hell are you talking about?

If she told people...and now mentions that she told people...and the people she told came forth to testify that she did...

...it would HELP her case. It would not prove it, but it would help establish the veracity of her claim.

Yet her denying that she told anyone, also proves her case.

NOTHING except for Kavanaugh confessing (or Judge testifying he saw it happen) would PROVE her case.

What in the name of the cosmos makes you suppose her denying she told anyone "proves her case?"

Do you have any notion of logic...or how it works?

so what you are really saying is nothing short of fluff to back up your biases.

What do you suppose my bias is?

I am on the side of having the FBI investigate TO SEE IF THEY CAN FIND ANYTHING TO SUPPORT HER VERSION...or something that might show her story to be false.

Either could happen.

We do not know.
 
It's not a federal crime to lie to local PD; the penalties for lying to local PD vary depending on the jurisdiction and the prosecutor's discretion.

But in no regard is lying to a cop a felony.

So that's why the FBI needs to investigate.


Why are you so focused on the "lying to the FBI" thing? I thought that the purpose of this investigation is to find out whether or not Judge Kavanaugh committed an attempted rape. Surely if a police department in the locality of the alleged crime proves that he did in fact attempt to rape this young woman, then I would think he has bigger issues than "lying to the FBI"
 
so if she told people that would help prove her case. Yet her denying that she told anyone, also proves her case.

so what you are really saying is nothing short of fluff to back up your biases.

Let's review

Everything Ford does and says proves that Kavanaugh raped her

Everything Kavanaugh does and says proves that Kavanaugh raped her

If Ford testifies it is bad for Republicans

If Ford doesn't testify, it is bad for Republicans

Did I miss anything?
 
Why are you so focused on the "lying to the FBI" thing?

Because the FBI is the Conservatives' achilles' heel.

Lately, whenever Conservatives speak to the FBI they end up being caught in lies like Manafort, Papadopolous, Gates, and Flynn.

You know just as well as I do that there is no real penalty for lying to local PD. So that's why you want them to do the investigation, isn't it? Because lying to the local PD isn't a felony, but lying to the FBI is.

Don't you want the truth?
 
Because the FBI is the Conservatives' achilles' heel.

Lately, whenever Conservatives speak to the FBI they end up being caught in lies like Manafort, Papadopolous, Gates, and Flynn.

You know just as well as I do that there is no real penalty for lying to local PD. So that's why you want them to do the investigation, isn't it? Because lying to the local PD isn't a felony, but lying to the FBI is.

Don't you want the truth?

Actually there are real penalties for lying to the police department. Yes, it may not be a felony, but it isn't advisable

You seem to be more focused on lying to the FBI more than proving whether or not Kavanaugh raped Ford. Unless of course you have already determined that he did it and now it is just a matter of getting him to perjure himself?

That's it isn't it?
 
I thought that the purpose of this investigation is to find out whether or not Judge Kavanaugh committed an attempted rape

And the FBI can absolutely investigate that. The only ones who are preventing them from doing so are the same people who want to rush Bretty's confirmation. Obviously, to protect Trump and the GOP from the inevitable conclusions of Mueller's investigation.


Surely if a police department in the locality of the alleged crime proves that he did in fact attempt to rape this young woman, then I would think he has bigger issues than "lying to the FBI"

Lying to the FBI about raping Ford would be a felony.

It wouldn't be a felony to lie to local PD.

So that's why it has to be an FBI investigation.
 
Let's review
Everything Ford does and says proves that Kavanaugh raped her
Everything Kavanaugh does and says proves that Kavanaugh raped her
If Ford testifies it is bad for Republicans
If Ford doesn't testify, it is bad for Republicans
Did I miss anything?

Yup, that's pretty much it.

You guys fucked yourselves with this.

And trotting out Roy Moore to defend Bretty is just poor optics at this point. It's desperation. Do you not recall what happened in Alabama?
 
Roger Ailes is dead and Bill O'Reilly is no longer on Fox News so how did you see them be "insensitive" to this issue about Ford?

Smoking crack again?

dear fucking idiot

I gave you more sex criminals from fox than them


it is a persistent problem at Fox "news"


fuck you very much
 
The only thing the FBI could do would be a 7th background check on Kav.

The FBI could check the story out. The FBI could see if there are people who can shed more light on the issue.

This no longer is about something this guy did when he was a teenager, Stretch...IT IS ABOUT WHAT HE IS DOING RIGHT NOW.

RIGHT NOW...he is saying that he did not accost Dr. Ford.

HE MAY BE LYING RIGHT NOW.

How many times does that have to be mentioned before you people finally get it?

FBI background checks only go back as far as a person's age of 18 which is meaningless in this case.
Teenage pool party misconduct would be handles by local authorities.
End of story.

Can you document this?

I had a TOP SECRET security clearance when I was in SAC...back in the 1950's. I had a BI performed on me by the FBI...and I think I was only 19 when I got it. I cannot imagine the checked only the two years prior when I was in service.



Oh...the congress will let us know when the "end of story" comes. YOU do not get to decide that.
 
Actually there are real penalties for lying to the police department. Yes, it may not be a felony, but it isn't advisable

The penalties depend on the jurisdiction, but in most cases, lying to local cops isn't prosecuted, and if the offender is caught doing so, the penalties are at the discretion of the DA pressing the charges.

That's not the case with the FBI; there is no discretion on penalties. You lie to them, you go to jail.


ou seem to be more focused on lying to the FBI more than proving whether or not Kavanaugh raped Ford. Unless of course you have already determined that he did it and now it is just a matter of getting him to perjure himself?

How could he possibly perjure himself if he's innocent?

Conservatives don't have a very good track record when it comes to being honest with law enforcement (Flynn, Gates, Manafort, Papadopolous).
 
Simple:

Lying to local law enforcement is not a felony. In fact, the penalties for lying to local PD vary depending on the jurisdiction, are at the local prosecutor's discretion, and could be just a fine.

However, lying to the FBI is a felony. So it's pretty obvious why Conservatives don't want their people talking to the FBI; because Conservatives simply can't help themselves from lying to federal agents. They all saw what happened to Flynn, Manafort, Gates, and Papadopolous when they lied to the FBI, and they don't want that to happen again.

So there's a lot of bad faith posturing going on, like your bad faith question here.

You obviously know that there's no federal statute when it comes to lying to local law enforcement; a cursory Google search would reveal that.

So that begs the obvious question; why are you acting in bad faith?

The answer is because you simply don't know how to act any other way.

Great answer, LV!

Great!
 
To hell with what she “wants “, the alleged “crime” isn’t even federal

she has rights asshole


this is NOT a criminal investigation


this the vetting of a possible SCOTUS member


there is absolutely NO REASON to rush this process
 
Back
Top