They call Bill Clinton a rapist with less...

[Oneuli]

She's already said how she's forgotten so much about the incident.
When?
Where?
How she got there?
How she got home?
etc.?

As to your confusion regarding false memories, may I suggest you investigate this yourself:

False Memories

Malpractice cases

During the late 1990s, there were multiple lawsuits in the United States in which psychiatrists and psychologists were successfully sued, or settled out of court, on the charge of propagating iatrogenic memories of childhood sexual abuse, incest, and satanic ritual abuse.

Some of these suits were brought by individuals who later declare that their recovered memories of incest or satanic ritual abuse had been false. The False Memory Syndrome Foundation uses the term retractors to describe these individuals, and have shared their stories publicly.[34] There is debate regarding the total number of retractions as compared to the total number of allegations, and the reasons for retractions.

If you need more info, I'll be glad to help; just ask.

You appear to have missed the question entirely, so I'll reiterate:

Have you experienced something like what you're saying happened to Ford -- situations where someone did something horrible to you, but then you forgot who it was and later became wrongly convinced, with 100% certainty, that it was someone else who did it?

 

[cancel2 2022]

"They called Bill Clinton a rapist with less..."

????

Leslie Millwee!!!

 

[Jarod]

How's this for LESS???

Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known

How is that evidence of anything, Trump also flew on that plane.

 

[Jarod]

How many times must you be told that Kavanaugh was never accused of rape you dumbfuck?

Where did I say he was you dumbfuck?

 

[Oneuli]

Was Broaddrick lying when she stated that she had only denied being raped under oath to protect her privacy?

Well, she was lying one time or the other -- either when she was trying to sell a book based on the supposed attack, or when she was giving sworn testimony, under pains and penalties of perjury. Which of the two strikes you as the time she was more likely to have been honest?

I believe people are more likely to be honest not when gossiping for money, but instead when they've solemnly given their oath that they will tell the truth, and know there could be legal consequences for lying. So, yes, I think she was lying when she later claimed she lied under oath to protect her privacy.

We know many things about Broaddrick, but the idea that she's a woman who guards her privacy isn't one of them:

http://juanitabroaddrick.com/
https://twitter.com/atensnut?lang=en

She's made herself into a public figure, who has been doing frequent media appearances for twenty years. You can turn Fox News on most any week and find her scrambling for the limelight by connecting her claims to whatever story is running that day.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cl...be-on-clinton-rape-claim-amid-kavanaugh-furor

Trying to connect Juanita Broaddrick, professional publicity hound, with the figure of a shy Juanita Broaddrick who'd perjure herself in order to try to keep her privacy, is an exercise in absurdity.

When was Kavanaugh accused of rape?

Did someone claim he was accused of rape?

 

[Red Crow]

How is that evidence of anything, Trump also flew on that plane.

That is a lie.

Trump did not fly on that plane nor ever visit Orgy Island, which was the frequent destination of that plane.

Now ... you can disingenuously pretend that is meaningless but, the rest of the normal thinking Americans on Main Street know better.

 

[Oneuli]

Wrong; Juanita Broaddrick alleged that, in the late 1970s, Clinton raped her in her hotel room. Was she lying?

In the mid-1990s she swore under oath that it never happened. So, logically, she must be lying one time or the other. It just comes down to whether you found her more plausible when speaking under oath, or when doing media appearances to sell her book.

 

[Oneuli]

Another willful idiot who doesn't know the difference between a claim of "groping" and a claim of rape. You're almost as stupid as JarredHead.

You apparently didn't watch Ford's testimony. She didn't merely say that he groped her. She expressly said she thought he was going to rape her. So, the allegation is of attempted rape, whether you believe the allegation or not. That would be different than, say, the allegation by multiple women that GHW Bush groped them, since none of them thought he was planning to rape them.

 

[Oneuli]

How's this for LESS???

Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known

The fact that Clinton, who was raising money for charity, flew to a billionaire's home is not surprising. That's what people who are raising big money for charity do -- they hobnob with those who have a lot of money. There's been no allegation that I'm aware of, by any woman, that Clinton was involved in any sexual misconduct related to those visits.

Compare that to Trump. Two separate women have sworn, under oath, that Trump raped a child and then threatened her and her family if she told anyone, at one of Epstein's parties.

 

[Oneuli]

Where did I say he was you dumbfuck?

Right-wingers have taken straw-man attacks to the next level. Not only do they invent things they wish you'd said and then attack them, but they do so with blind rage.

 

[Red Crow]

In the mid-1990s she swore under oath that it never happened. So, logically, she must be lying one time or the other. It just comes down to whether you found her more plausible when speaking under oath, or when doing media appearances to sell her book.

She admitted that she lied under oath at the time because she feared for her life.

She only recanted the affidavit years later after numerous more women came forward with allegations.

Broaddrick said she felt at that time she could come forwards with the truth without fear of bodily harm.

 

[Oneuli]

That is a lie.

Trump did not fly on that plane nor ever visit Orgy Island, which was the frequent destination of that plane.

Now ... you can disingenuously pretend that is meaningless but, the rest of the normal thinking Americans on Main Street know better.

With Trump, it's much worse than that. A woman actually filed suit against him for allegedly raping her, when she was a child, at one of Epstein's parties. And it wasn't just a he-said/she-said situation. A second woman swore under oath that she'd worked for Epstein, recruiting girls and young women for the parties, and that she also witnessed Trump rape the kid. Both affidavits are available online.

By comparison, I'm not aware of any woman accusing Clinton of any misconduct at Epstein's place, much less anyone doing so under oath.

 

[Red Crow]

The fact that Clinton, who was raising money for charity, flew to a billionaire's home is not surprising. That's what people who are raising big money for charity do -- they hobnob with those who have a lot of money. There's been no allegation that I'm aware of, by any woman, that Clinton was involved in any sexual misconduct related to those visits.

Compare that to Trump. Two separate women have sworn, under oath, that Trump raped a child and then threatened her and her family if she told anyone, at one of Epstein's parties.

Bill Clinton did not fly to a billionaire's home.

You are lying.

That plane, called "The Lolita Express", that Bill Clinton flew upon numerous times, was used for sex with under aged girls as was Epstien's private island name "Orgy Island" which was a frequent destination of that plane.

You are being disingenuous and intentionally so.

 

[Oneuli]

She admitted that she lied under oath at the time because she feared for her life.

I've heard various claims from her about why she supposedly lied under oath -- to protect her privacy, because she was afraid, etc. In order to believe that, you need to believe that for some reason those considerations reversed right around the time she started making good money as a professional Clinton accuser -- that for some reason she no longer valued her privacy or no longer was worried about Clinton taking revenge.

One way or the other she's a liar. She's either a perjurer, who gave her oath to tell the truth and then unequivocally said there was nothing to the rumors, or she's a publicity hound who told the truth when faced with the pains and penalties of perjury, but happily lied in situations where she knew there'd be no repercussions for that.

Since she has no other evidence, and her own hearsay accusations are contradicted by her formal testimony, I don't give her charges any weight.

 

[Oneuli]

Bill Clinton did not fly to a billionaire's home.

He did indeed. The island in question had a house of Epstein's, as well as several guest houses for visitors.

 

[Truth Detector]

Where did I say he was you dumbfuck?

Right there you ignorant asshole:

TRumpers call Bill Clinton a rapist with less evidence than we have on Kavanaugh.

 

[Truth Detector]

Well, she was lying one time or the other -- either when she was trying to sell a book based on the supposed attack, or when she was giving sworn testimony, under pains and penalties of perjury. Which of the two strikes you as the time she was more likely to have been honest?

I believe people are more likely to be honest not when gossiping for money, but instead when they've solemnly given their oath that they will tell the truth, and know there could be legal consequences for lying. So, yes, I think she was lying when she later claimed she lied under oath to protect her privacy.

We know many things about Broaddrick, but the idea that she's a woman who guards her privacy isn't one of them:

http://juanitabroaddrick.com/
https://twitter.com/atensnut?lang=en

She's made herself into a public figure, who has been doing frequent media appearances for twenty years. You can turn Fox News on most any week and find her scrambling for the limelight by connecting her claims to whatever story is running that day.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cl...be-on-clinton-rape-claim-amid-kavanaugh-furor

Trying to connect Juanita Broaddrick, professional publicity hound, with the figure of a shy Juanita Broaddrick who'd perjure herself in order to try to keep her privacy, is an exercise in absurdity.

It is a simple question that doesn't need five paragraphs of bullshit. Was she lying? Yes or No?

Did someone claim he was accused of rape?

The idiot who started this thread.

 

[Truth Detector]

In the mid-1990s she swore under oath that it never happened. So, logically, she must be lying one time or the other. It just comes down to whether you found her more plausible when speaking under oath, or when doing media appearances to sell her book.

Why do you think she is lying if you think Ford is telling the truth?

 

[Truth Detector]

Right-wingers have taken straw-man attacks to the next level. Not only do they invent things they wish you'd said and then attack them, but they do so with blind rage.

IRONY! You need a mirror.

 

[Truth Detector]

With Trump, it's much worse than that. A woman actually filed suit against him for allegedly raping her, when she was a child, at one of Epstein's parties. And it wasn't just a he-said/she-said situation. A second woman swore under oath that she'd worked for Epstein, recruiting girls and young women for the parties, and that she also witnessed Trump rape the kid. Both affidavits are available online.

By comparison, I'm not aware of any woman accusing Clinton of any misconduct at Epstein's place, much less anyone doing so under oath.

LINK.