Argument of the Stone.What applies to one applies to the other.
Doli in capax ^
Argument of the Stone.What applies to one applies to the other.
Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
Incomplete definition, but this characteristic is part of agnostic belief.
Fine I have no problem with this part.
This is the argument of ignorance fallacy.
I just did.
There is no such thing as a 'loaded' syllogism.
Calculus is a branch of mathematics, not logic. Redefinition fallacy. Your logic is also flawed, due to the argument of ignorance fallacy in your argument.
No doubt!
History is not a proof. It simply is.
The term 'NAZI', when translated into English, means National Socialist German Workers. It is SOCIALISM, dude. Fascism is one of two forms of socialism, the other being communism.
Socialism can only exist by stealing wealth from others. Hitler did it too. Capitalism is the only system that creates wealth out of nothing.
It is. Proof by Identity.
Once again. That is completely incorrect. Wrong. The Nazi's were far right.
It seems IN #782 won't accept yes for an answer.
Agreed substance over form. They could call themselves the zionist party and still that wouldn't change the fact that the gassed Jews, poles, romani, homosexuals or other "undesirables."
Once again. That is completely incorrect. Wrong. The Nazi's were far right.
sorry but that is ignorant......they have nothing at all in common with modern American conservatives......they share far more beliefs about the role of government with American demmycrats and socialists.....the only difference is they want the government to take control of business by force instead of legislation....
Nazis have nothing to do with modern American conservatives. At all. If it came across that way, it was misunderstood. There is no American political leaning in this country (Left, Right, Middle) that could ever be compared with the Nazi's. The careless use of this comparison in politics astounds me.
President Trump is such a towering intellect, you can see his shoes in his driver's license photo. Trump towers many Ångströms above both his peers."On the shoulders of this giant, they stand!" M #813
President Trump is such a towering intellect, you can see his shoes in his driver's license photo. Trump towers many Ångströms above both his peers.
At least you're honest about wishing to remain an ignorant ignoramus...I didn't bother reading this....
Well, I don't consider IN a serious thinker anyway. Basically trolling using random terms in logic as bait.
He's a much better thinker than you are, that's for damn sure...
At least you're honest about wishing to remain an ignorant ignoramus...
Well, they shouldn't be attempting to do so, anyway... That would make them fundamentalists of their religion.It is not the job of atheists to disprove god.
No, it is not. Sure, believers would like unbelievers to believe and enjoy the same benefits that they enjoy, but in the end, if I were to attempt proving my religion to you, I would be a fundamentalist (committing the circular argument fallacy).It is the function of an advocate to convince people there is one and we should join their church.
Circular Argument Fallacy (fundamentalism). You can't prove that religion is a scam. This claim of yours is also self refuting because you yourself are practicing a religion [and are a fundamentalist of it] (atheism).I am not trying to convince you to leave your church because it is a scam. It is, but you are an insider who has swallowed all the propaganda.
That's your belief...A fictional being
Correct, god(s) can't be disproven. They can't be proven either. Religion is an open functional system.cannot be disproven.
What do you mean by "no tracks"? ... Depends on which god(s) we're speaking about... False... they also exist in books, and may or may not exist in the same "reality" that you and I exist in.They leave no tracks, don't have a body and only exist in the minds of believers.
The "mind" and the "brain" are not synonymous.Perhaps an MRI?
Circular Argument Fallacy (fundamentalism).But since they do not exist,
False. There is plenty of supporting evidence for god(s). For the Christian God, the Holy Bible is evidence. Prayers being answered is evidence. Those evidences just happen to not convince you.there is no evidence possible.
I don't have proof of it, but I have what I feel is good supporting evidence that the Easter Bunny does not exist in reality.Show me proof that the easter Bunny is not real. Not just the knowledge, but solid evidence. He leaves chocolate eggs.