First Gun Confiscation Killing Reported in Maryland

[Rusty Bell 65]

"Article the sixth... The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Sounds to me like a blatant infringement of his Constitutional right.

 

[Rune]

Sounds to me like his family was right to be afraid of him..

He should have turned over his guns and THEN hired a lawyer.

Uh, no.
Not the way it works.
The police should have secured a court date.
Then, IF a judge agreed, he should have been ordered to relinquish his gun permit and sell his guns to a licenced firearms dealer.

 

[MagaMaggot]

Lick my balls retard.

Do it yourself.

 

[kudzu]

Uh, no.
Not the way it works.
The police should have secured a court date.
Then, IF a judge agreed, he should have been ordered to relinquish his gun permit and sell his guns to a licenced firearms dealer.

May have been too late by then.. Take the guns and then sort out the issues.

Would you have taken the gun of the Marine who killed 12 in Thousand Oaks?

 

[MagaMaggot]

Uh, no.
Not the way it works.
The police should have secured a court date.
Then, IF a judge agreed, he should have been ordered to relinquish his gun permit and sell his guns to a licenced firearms dealer.

The trigger happy gun fanatic prevented that from happening.

When you fight authority, authority always wins.

 

[Rune]

That's due process... But, obviously his guns were more important to him than his family.

I am so sorry to be the one to explain this to you, BUT due process ALWAYS REQUIRES A COURT ORDER.

 

[MagaMaggot]

"Article the sixth... The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Sounds to me like a blatant infringement of his Constitutional right.

Probable cause when someone's life is in danger needs no warrant.

 

[Rune]

The trigger happy gun fanatic prevented that from happening.

When you fight authority, authority always wins.

Nope.
The police acted without a court order.

 

[MagaMaggot]

Can you give us the facts that would lead you to that conclusion?

Ask the undertaker.

 

[Rune]

Probable cause when someone's life is in danger needs no warrant.

Prove someone was in danger.
His niece testified that he was a nice man who would never hurt anyone.

 

[Rune]

The trigger happy gun fanatic prevented that from happening.

When you fight authority, authority always wins.

Please do not quote or address me further.

 

[Rusty Bell 65]

Probable cause when someone's life is in danger needs no warrant.

What probable cause was there? Or do you think infringing on your Constitutional rights are OK?

 

[Rune]

May have been too late by then.. Take the guns and then sort out the issues.

Would you have taken the gun of the Marine who killed 12 in Thousand Oaks?

Not without due process.

 

[volsrock]

link to what desperado?

The link that states people have the right to request something be taken away from someone that has not broken any laws

 

[MagaMaggot]

What probable cause was there? Or do you think infringing on your Constitutional rights are OK?

His family feared for their lives. Most shootings are domestic family affairs.

 

[MagaMaggot]

The link that states people have the right to request something be taken away from someone that has not broken any laws

I am sure he had threatened people's lives. His actions proved this.

 

[reagansghost]

What probable cause was there? Or do you think infringing on your Constitutional rights are OK?

where does the constitution forbid a family from reining in a nutjob relation?

 

[Rusty Bell 65]

His family feared for their lives. Most shootings are domestic family affairs.

Show us where they feared for their lives.
Just because you're too stupid to operate the TV remote is no reason to confiscate your TV, is it?

 

[Rusty Bell 65]

where does the constitution forbid a family from reining in a nutjob relation?

Has he threatened anyone?

 

[volsrock]

where does the constitution forbid a family from reining in a nutjob relation?

where does does the constitution say they can

it does say right to bear arms