White Liberals Present Themselves as Less Competent in Interactions with Blacks

cawacko said:
Cydney who?

For a liberal her resume ought to be a gold standard for you:



Cydney Dupree
Assistant Professor of Organizational Behavior

Faculty Directory
Professor Dupree’s research interests broadly address how to reduce divisions between social groups and increase the inclusion of under-represented minorities within and across organizations. She uses surveys, experiments, and archival work to delve into the strategies used by social groups in seeking to meet their interpersonal affiliative and hierarchical goals, considering the implications of these strategies for reducing inequality and achieving successful interracial interactions.

Current lines of research investigate: 1) the impact of socio-political attitudes and stereotypes on verbal and nonverbal outgroup behavior, 2) the ways in which associations between race and status influence minority- and majority-group members’ occupational preferences, and 3) the situational and individual differences factors that influence prosocial outgroup behavior.

Professor Dupree was a recipient of a National Science Foundation Graduate Student Fellowship, and she was a member of Princeton University’s Joint Degree Program in the Study of Inequality. Her work has appeared in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Current Opinion in Psychology, and Journal of Social Issues.


https://som.yale.edu/faculty/cydney-dupree
Click to expand...

oh great catch wacko, now tell me why I should take this kook seriously
 
volsrock said:
According to new research by Cydney Dupree, assistant professor of organizational behavior at Yale SOM, white liberals tend to downplay their own verbal competence in exchanges with racial minorities, compared to how other white Americans act in such exchanges. The study is scheduled for publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insig...U-P6YV-WL_1l4hD91tDFG0EnFsjk5BSoqHCu-q-Lp2o8A


And yet blacks still vote Democrat 80-90% of the time.

I guess they like being talked-down to.
Click to expand...

That's because white conservatives have such poor verbal skills, there is no "down". Only "up".
 
They should study ignorant rightards parroting words they learn from liberals, and concepts with
which they have no acquaintance because they were home schooled by a high school dropout who married
a grease monkey who left mommy pregnant at age 14. It could used in a graduate class in comedic arts appreciation.
 
reagansghost said:
yes, do you?
Click to expand...

Yes, I do. And people are free to disagree with them. Just because they are academics doesn't mean what they say is correct. Just because these are Ivy League professors doesn't mean they know everything.

But you don't understand their study if you think it's an op-ed.
 
Micawber said:
They should study ignorant rightards parroting words they learn from liberals, and concepts with
which they have no acquaintance because they were home schooled by a high school dropout who married
a grease monkey who left mommy pregnant at age 14. It could used in a graduate class in comedic arts appreciation.
Click to expand...

Didn't even open up the study did you?
 
Complete RW vocabulary:

Squawk! Invaders!
Squawk! Mob!
Squawk! Fake News!
Squawk! Cabal!
Squawk! Uranium One!
Squawk! MAGA!
Squawk! Witch Hunt!
Squawk! No Collusion!
Squawk! Deep State!
Squawk! Coup!
Squawk! Nothingburger!
 
cawacko said:
Yes, I do. And people are free to disagree with them. Just because they are academics doesn't mean what they say is correct. Just because these are Ivy League professors doesn't mean they know everything.

But you don't understand their study if you think it's an op-ed.
Click to expand...

read a few paragraphs, appeared their perceptions equal their realities........studies can be manipulated like statistics easily and are every day

assuming the study has any validity, exactly what is their point other than Democrats often communicate with disadvantaged minorities in language they can comprehend?

Is this assistant professor clueless as to why these ex-slaves and 4th class citizens are so poorly educated?

why is this study worth publishing?
 
cawacko said:
Didn't even open up the study did you?
Click to expand...

No, I saw it was about politicians and so was an absurd measure of general tendencies of liberals.
Politicians pander by definition to whomsoever, wheresoever. Sad they tend to patronize minorities,
but that says nothing about me or any other liberals
 
cawacko said:
Interesting, a study from the Yale School of Management is now desolate intellectualism? An article written by a woman of color professor is desolate intellectualism? Is that because you don't like what it says?
Click to expand...

Most of the cons here are always putting down East Coast schools as bastions of liberal propaganda. Volsrock just lost his conservative cred with this thread.
 
domer76 said:
Complete RW vocabulary:

Squawk! Invaders!
Squawk! Mob!
Squawk! Fake News!
Squawk! Cabal!
Squawk! Uranium One!
Squawk! MAGA!
Squawk! Witch Hunt!
Squawk! No Collusion!
Squawk! Deep State!
Squawk! Coup!
Squawk! Nothingburger!
Click to expand...

So nothing to say about the study huh?
 
christiefan915 said:
Most of the cons here are always putting down East Coast schools as bastions of liberal propaganda. Volsrock just lost his conservative cred with this thread.
Click to expand...

He didn't have conservative cred to begin with, he's just a flat out racist.

What do you think of the study?
 
cawacko said:
Interesting, a study from the Yale School of Management is now desolate intellectualism? An article written by a woman of color professor is desolate intellectualism? Is that because you don't like what it says?
Click to expand...

Do you think Volsrock really cares what this woman wrote? He's one of the most outspoken racist Klan members on this forum.
 
reagansghost said:
read a few paragraphs, appeared their perceptions equal their realities........studies can be manipulated like statistics easily and are every day

assuming the study has any validity, exactly what is their point other than Democrats often communicate with disadvantaged minorities in language they can comprehend?

Is this assistant professor clueless as to why these ex-slaves and 4th class citizens are so poorly educated?

why is this study worth publishing?
Click to expand...

Ex-slaves? I don't think we have too many living ex-slaves in America. Well I should say those who were slaves in America. Aren't you making their point for them? You're saying black folks are poorly educated and thus shouldn't be talked to in the same way. Isn't that the ultimate condescending attitude? And the bigotry of low expectations?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top