Is Global Warming A Hoax? Discover The Climate Change Facts And Fiction

Granule

Firebrand
While many people in the media and scientific community claim the climate change science is settled, do the facts back that up? Derisively called "deniers," climate change skeptics continue to challenge the so-called conventional wisdom, asking "Is global warming a hoax? Is man-made global warming the dire threat environmentalists claim?"

Recent global warming agreements brokered by the U.N. seek steep reductions in world C02 output to slow the presumed warming of the earth's atmosphere, while also seeking alterations in the economy that would move energy sources away from fossil fuels toward renewable natural energy.

But a growing contingent of scientists and economists call into question the climate change dogma, saying that the temperature data show no clear recent warming and noting that the benefits of global warming, if it existed, might be greater than the costs. This split will define the political debate in the near term.

https://www.investors.com/politics/global-warming-hoax-climate-change-facts/


The sky is freezing the sky is FREEZING!!!!

-- The Left
 
Meanwhile, south of the Equator where it is currently summer, Australia is once again experiencing record heat.

So you want to know where the global warming is? Take out a map, locate the Equator, find the country of Australia, see their record heat, and go fuck yourself.
 
While many people in the media and scientific community claim the climate change science is settled, do the facts back that up? Derisively called "deniers," climate change skeptics continue to challenge the so-called conventional wisdom, asking "Is global warming a hoax? Is man-made global warming the dire threat environmentalists claim?"

Recent global warming agreements brokered by the U.N. seek steep reductions in world C02 output to slow the presumed warming of the earth's atmosphere, while also seeking alterations in the economy that would move energy sources away from fossil fuels toward renewable natural energy.

But a growing contingent of scientists and economists call into question the climate change dogma, saying that the temperature data show no clear recent warming and noting that the benefits of global warming, if it existed, might be greater than the costs. This split will define the political debate in the near term.

https://www.investors.com/politics/global-warming-hoax-climate-change-facts/


The sky is freezing the sky is FREEZING!!!!

-- The Left

"growing contingent of scientists and economists call into question the climate change?"

Is it really a "growing contingent?"

One of the strategdy of "deniers" is to create a false equivalence, a particular poster here does it often, employing a study or two challenging the consensus on climate change as if the evidence was equivalent to that supporting climate change. It is a fallacy
 
Meanwhile, south of the Equator where it is currently summer, Australia is once again experiencing record heat.

So you want to know where the global warming is? Take out a map, locate the Equator, find the country of Australia, see their record heat, and go fuck yourself.

How do you explain the huge heatwave in 1896, arsehole? You're one of the dumbest fuckers on here, albeit there's plenty of competition.

http://joannenova.com.au/2012/11/ex...he-outback-on-special-trains-as-hundreds-die/
 
One heat wave in one year.

Australia has been seeing record high heat waves consistently over the last 5-10 years.

You too quickly accepted the unsubstantiated assertion that was tossed into the thread.

I learned years ago the claims, assertions, proclamations, guesswork, even outright slander and libel of teabaggers cannot be trusted and require constant verification from reputable and reliable first hand sources.

You have to be diligent, because teabaggers will throw out such claims, guesses, pronouncements, slander, libel, and assertions with an air of authority. It pays to make them prove their unsubstantiated claims.

Fact Check: Was 1896 Australian heatwave the hottest heat wave on record? .

Verdict
False.


The poor quality of early data makes it impossible to conclude with confidence that 1896 was Australia’s hottest summer – the best available estimate is that it was considerably cooler than 2013.

https://theconversation.com/factcheck-was-the-1896-heatwave-wiped-from-the-record-33742
 
Last edited:
One heat wave in one year.

Australia has been seeing record high heat waves consistently over the last 5-10 years.

Australia has had a series of heatwaves over many years, sadly the media only sees the most recent and ignores the past. I can see why you want to reinforce your confirmation bias by believing that Australia is different from previous decades, even centuries, but the truth is far more nuanced and complex. But why should you believe the premier Australian newspaper, after all what the fuck do they know?

A history of deadly heatwaves

Australia has a long history of deadly heatwaves. The table below shows numbers of deaths and death rates per 100,000 population from episodes of extreme heat in Australia by decade, reaching back to 1844.

The information comes from PerilAUS, a database that records the impact of natural hazards reaching back to the early days of Australia's European settlement

The death rate is the number of deaths per head of population in the country at that time, and was consistently, significantly higher between 1890 and 1939 than for any period before or since.

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018...as-deadliest-hazard-why-you-need-plan/9338918 and Jarvis Worktops and
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, south of the Equator where it is currently summer, Australia is once again experiencing record heat.

So you want to know where the global warming is? Take out a map, locate the Equator, find the country of Australia, see their record heat, and go fuck yourself.
The sky's on fire, the sky's on FIRE!!!

-- The Left
 
Australia has had a series of heatesvez over many years, sadly the media only sees the most recent and ignores the past.

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018...as-deadliest-hazard-why-you-need-plan/9338918

Literally the only three heat waves your link talks about were in 1895-6 (which your link says the entire planet faced, not just Australia), 1939, and 2008. That's it.

2008 is the year the record heat waves started happening with more regularity and now they shatter heat records every year.
 
Australia has had a series of heatwaves over many years, sadly the media only sees the most recent and ignores the past. I can see why you want to reinforce your confirmation bias by believing that Australia is different from previous decades even centuries but the truth is far more nuanced.

[Quotes]

A history of deadly heatwaves

Australia has a long history of deadly heatwaves. The table below shows numbers of deaths and death rates per 100,000 population from episodes of extreme heat in Australia by decade, reaching back to 1844.

The information comes from PerilAUS, a database that records the impact of natural hazards reaching back to the early days of Australia's European settlement

The death rate is the number of deaths per head of population in the country at that time, and was consistently, significantly higher between 1890 and 1939 than for any period before or since.[/quotes]

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018...as-deadliest-hazard-why-you-need-plan/9338918

What you really meant to say was that from 1890 and 1939, Australia experienced 2 heat waves...one of which was global (1896).

So you used sophistry to pretend that a series of heat waves have hit Australia over many years.

But the part you leave out is that by "series" you meant two, and by "over many years" you meant 50.
 
"growing contingent of scientists and economists call into question the climate change?"

Is it really a "growing contingent?"

One of the strategdy of "deniers" is to create a false equivalence, a particular poster here does it often, employing a study or two challenging the consensus on climate change as if the evidence was equivalent to that supporting climate change. It is a fallacy
Global Warming is the fallacy you fucking stooge.

Like liberal Utopia, It doesn't exist. ;)
 
What you really meant to say was that from 1890 and 1939, Australia experienced 2 heat waves...one of which was global (1896).

So you used sophistry to pretend that a series of heat waves have hit Australia over many years.

But the part you leave out is that by "series" you meant two, and by "over many years" you meant 50.

If you looked at the graph of the number of deaths from heatwaves, you'd know that you are spouting specious bollocks.
 
But a growing contingent of scientists and economists call into question the climate change dogma, saying that the temperature data show no clear recent warming and noting that the benefits of global warming, if it existed, might be greater than the costs. This split will define the political debate in the near term.

https://www.investors.com/politics/global-warming-hoax-climate-change-facts/


t
What growing contingent of scientists? Dentists? It certainly isn't any scientist that actually studies climate.

The most vocal scientist, Willie Soon, has been accused of fraud for failing to reveal the funding for his research. There really is no one else out there since Fred Singer turned 90 a few years ago.
 
If you looked at the graph of the number of deaths from heatwaves, you'd know that you are spouting specious bollocks.

That is like arguing that the graph of the number of deaths from auto accidents proves there are fewer cars on the road.

Bollocks indeed for you to make your specious claim that number of deaths is a measurement of temperature.
 
Back
Top