ISIS Bride Wants To Come Back To US

Bad people were accepted back here also. One I mentioned, John Lindh, is still in prison. He was extradited from A'stan, had a trial and went to prison. That's supposed to be the way the American justice system works.



Questioning Begum's sincerity, the imam at the Baitul Aman mosque Moulana Abdul Malik, 51, told The Times: 'People who are brainwashed may not have changed their habits — those who go to extremism will not change.
.
 
Questioning Begum's sincerity, the imam at the Baitul Aman mosque Moulana Abdul Malik, 51, told The Times: 'People who are brainwashed may not have changed their habits — those who go to extremism will not change.

Okay? I still think she should go through the justice system. It's not likely she'd get a pass on what she did and would have to do time in prison.

Btw re: your quote, that's the sentiment the US uses to justify indefinite detention of those in Guantanamo.
 
Can I just say it was a migrant from Libya who was granted asylum that carried out the Manchester bombing at the Ariana Grande concert where 23 people, including the bomber, died and 139 were wounded. Many of those were just innocent children, right or wrongly that has hardened many people's hearts towards accepting people back. She is in record as saying that the bombing was a legitimate act of revenge.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ys-19-year-old-lying-wanting-change-ways.html
good old Libya is still FUBAR. 8 years after the 2011 'revolution' this month
I'm pretty sure they were the "security guards" hired to protect our ambassador Stevens as well

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/28/salman-abedi-manchester-arena-bomber-radicalisation
The 22-year-old was influenced in part by the people who formed the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, a little-known al-Qaida affiliate outlawed in 2004
Formed in the early 1990s to fight the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the LIFG relocated to Libya where, in 1996, the US treasury department records that it attempted to assassinate Muammar Gaddafi “and replace his regime with a hardline Islamic state”.

When that plot – which some claim was backed by MI6 – failed, the LIFG was pursued by Gaddafi’s security forces.
A large number fled to the UK, where they were granted asylum on the grounds that as opponents of Gaddafi
“our enemy’s enemy is our friend”, and many went to Birmingham and Manchester – home to established Arab communities that had found work in the cities’ engineering industries.
 
Irrelevant.

Besides, your titty baby Zappacrite says "different name, different poster", doesn't he? "D

Not irrelevant. You claimed I was indifferent to Julian Cadman, I claimed you were indifferent... more than indifferent, cruel... about Heather Heyer. :nodyes:
 
Okay? I still think she should go through the justice system. It's not likely she'd get a pass on what she did and would have to do time in prison.

Btw re: your quote, that's the sentiment the US uses to justify indefinite detention of those in Guantanamo.

She has a baby, so would probably never serve any time in prison. She has never shown even the slightest remorse or contrition. She also said that she was happy in Syria so why should we let her back? She had a Dutch husband so why can't they take her?
 
You were, and still are. Why? :thinking:

Your kitty senses need a tune-up. I'm a dove and opposed to all violence. As you well know. :nodyes:

Fortune-Teller-Canvas-Wall-Plaque-by-Lisa-Parker.jpg
 
She has a baby, so would probably never serve any time in prison. She has never shown even the slightest remorse or contrition. She also said that she was happy in Syria so why should we let her back? She had a Dutch husband so why can't they take her?

Understand that I don't think she's a good person and there's no way for me or anyone to determine if she's sincere or not. However, I think the US should follow the rule of law and bring her back to face charges because until we're told otherwise by someone besides the trump administration, she's a citizen. And she could certainly do jail time even though she has a baby; plenty of mothers here do. Our news outlets have stated that she did show remorse and knows if she comes back she'll have to do jail time. Also they've made no mention of her having a Dutch husband she could go to.

"When asked what she expects will happen if she is allowed to return to the U.S., Muthana replied, "Of course I’ll be given jail time."

Muthana described herself as a former Islamic “radical” who has changed her beliefs. She added that she deeply regrets traveling to ISIS territory and that she was “brainwashed” online.

She explained a sickening process of pairing off IS brides with fighters, where young girls were coached to pick husbands from a list of photos. Her first husband was Australian jihadi and IS fighter Suhan Rahman, who was killed in battle. Her second husband was also killed fighting, and she married a third time but she no longer knows where her husband is.

https://www.news.com.au/world/middl...p/news-story/733f7526cfff6283ea7c4535f9c009e4
 
Understand that I don't think she's a good person and there's no way for me or anyone to determine if she's sincere or not. However, I think the US should follow the rule of law and bring her back to face charges because until we're told otherwise by someone besides the trump administration, she's a citizen. And she could certainly do jail time even though she has a baby; plenty of mothers here do. Our news outlets have stated that she did show remorse and knows if she comes back she'll have to do jail time. Also they've made no mention of her having a Dutch husband she could go to.

"When asked what she expects will happen if she is allowed to return to the U.S., Muthana replied, "Of course I’ll be given jail time."

Muthana described herself as a former Islamic “radical” who has changed her beliefs. She added that she deeply regrets traveling to ISIS territory and that she was “brainwashed” online.

She explained a sickening process of pairing off IS brides with fighters, where young girls were coached to pick husbands from a list of photos. Her first husband was Australian jihadi and IS fighter Suhan Rahman, who was killed in battle. Her second husband was also killed fighting, and she married a third time but she no longer knows where her husband is.

https://www.news.com.au/world/middl...p/news-story/733f7526cfff6283ea7c4535f9c009e4

I am referring to Shamima Begum, even her own father says that she should not be allowed back to the UK.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6738277/Shamima-Begums-father-says-governments-side.html
 
"Muthana described herself as a former Islamic “radical” who has changed her beliefs. She added that she deeply regrets traveling to ISIS territory and that she was “brainwashed” online. She explained a sickening process of pairing off IS brides with fighters, where young girls were coached to pick husbands from a list of photos. Her first husband was Australian jihadi and IS fighter Suhan Rahman, who was killed in battle. Her second husband was also killed fighting, and she married a third time but she no longer knows where her husband is.

So you buy her story that she's just an innocent victim? :palm:
 
Back
Top