1989 FLASHBACK: U.N. Predicts Climate Disaster by 2000

Apparently you think a disaster is something apocalyptic, because we're having disasters of climate all over the globe, and things are getting worse. Be glad that many that abused the world, changed their ways since those days, and the green warriors pick up you losers slack. It could be that much worse.

The worst droughts in US history werr the Dust Bowl years 1930s ...u know during Exxons hayday

Had nothing to do with GW
 
Hardly any rain in Seattle for four years. Yeah, I wasn't complaining much over that one.

One of my sisters lived out in Port Orchard for a while. Loved the weather. She came back to the East Coast for a few years and then within the last two years moved back permanently to Port Orchard. She is not real happy with the weather this year!
 
18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first Earth Day in 1970, expect more this year

1. Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”

2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation,” wrote Washington University biologist Barry Commoner in the Earth Day issue of the scholarly journal Environment.

3. The day after the first Earth Day, the New York Times editorial page warned, “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”

4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich confidently declared in the April 1970 issue of Mademoiselle. “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”

5. “Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born,” wrote Paul Ehrlich in a 1969 essay titled “Eco-Catastrophe! “By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”

6. Ehrlich sketched out his most alarmist scenario for the 1970 Earth Day issue of The Progressive, assuring readers that between 1980 and 1989, some 4 billion people, including 65 million Americans, would perish in the “Great Die-Off.”

7. “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” declared Denis Hayes, the chief organizer for Earth Day, in the Spring 1970 issue of The Living Wilderness.

8. Peter Gunter, a North Texas State University professor, wrote in 1970, “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”

9. In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”

10. Ecologist Kenneth Watt told Time that, “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

11. Barry Commoner predicted that decaying organic pollutants would use up all of the oxygen in America’s rivers, causing freshwater fish to suffocate.

12. Paul Ehrlich chimed in, predicting in 1970 that “air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” Ehrlich sketched a scenario in which 200,000 Americans would die in 1973 during “smog disasters” in New York and Los Angeles.

13. Paul Ehrlich warned in the May 1970 issue of Audubon that DDT and other chlorinated hydrocarbons “may have substantially reduced the life expectancy of people born since 1945.” Ehrlich warned that Americans born since 1946…now had a life expectancy of only 49 years, and he predicted that if current patterns continued this expectancy would reach 42 years by 1980, when it might level out. (Note: According to the most recent CDC report, life expectancy in the US is 78.8 years).

14. Ecologist Kenneth Watt declared, “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, `Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, `I am very sorry, there isn’t any.'”

15. Harrison Brown, a scientist at the National Academy of Sciences, published a chart in Scientific American that looked at metal reserves and estimated the humanity would totally run out of copper shortly after 2000. Lead, zinc, tin, gold, and silver would be gone before 1990.

16. Sen. Gaylord Nelson wrote in Look that, “Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”

17. In 1975, Paul Ehrlich predicted that “since more than nine-tenths of the original tropical rainforests will be removed in most areas within the next 30 years or so, it is expected that half of the organisms in these areas will vanish with it.”

18. Kenneth Watt warned about a pending Ice Age in a speech. “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years,” he declared. “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”
 
So clearly climate change did happen on a catastrophic scale, just as was predicted.

giphy.gif


giphy.gif
 
The Associated Press is reporting on this June 29, 1989, that

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.

He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.

As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/mosel...saster-by-2000-if-global-warming-not-stopped/


In 1989 we had a 10 year window until 2000 to save the planet...DOOM AND GLOOM ETC

In 2019, they have now given us a 12 year window until 2031 to save the planet...

In 2032 I suspect we will get a 14 year window until 2046 to save the planet...

We're gaining on that global warming stuff folks. Keep working hard at it!

You didn't provide a credible link, and gave us a link to some obscure website no one has ever heard of.

You quoted some minor, obscure UN diplomat no one has ever heard of, when you could have easily gone to the website of a prestigious scientific organization with expertise in climate science.

You misrepresented what the UN official said, which was not that the world would be a disaster by 2000, but what he said was that if we did not start reversing the trend of sea level rise by 2000, we could be headed for disaster.

We are currently living with the effects of human-induced climate change. And they are going to get worse if we do nothing. That is unequivocal and known with a high degree of scientific confidence. The only debate is how bad the impacts will be - catastrophic, or something less than catastrophic.
 
You didn't provide a credible link, and gave us a link to some obscure website no one has ever heard of.

You quoted some minor, obscure UN diplomat no one has ever heard of, when you could have easily gone to the website of a prestigious scientific organization with expertise in climate science.

You misrepresented what the UN official said, which was not that the world would be a disaster by 2000, but what he said was that if we did not start reversing the trend of sea level rise by 2000, we could be headed for disaster.

We are currently living with the effects of human-induced climate change. And they are going to get worse if we do nothing. That is unequivocal and known with a high degree of scientific confidence. The only debate is how bad the impacts will be - catastrophic, or something less than catastrophic.

:lolup:Triggered snowflake eruption in progress. :laugh:

giphy.gif
 
Quote Originally Posted by volsrock
The ice age was a catastrophic event...u know Shell Oil was huge back then

No the ice age was an apocalyptic event. Hurricane Katrina was a catastrophic event. So literally it sounds like unless something like the ice age happens, you won't do anything to help the Earth. You do realize at those points humankind faces mass die off, or extinction, right, shit for brains?
 
One of my sisters lived out in Port Orchard for a while. Loved the weather. She came back to the East Coast for a few years and then within the last two years moved back permanently to Port Orchard. She is not real happy with the weather this year!

All that lovely snow!

:snow:
 
It was interesting to see places like Port Angeles covered in snow, after being there on summer vacation.

Port Angeles is not covered in snow in the Summer and very little, if at all. In the winter.

Get and really travel, instead of lying.
 
Back
Top