Russiagate is bullshit, has always been bullshit, and will continue to be bullshit.

deflective ad hom - a partisan hack is incapable of unbiased analysis as you demonstrate

I'm not attacking you by repeating what you've already admitted!

You're the one who said you have multiple IDs. So why would you have multiple IDs if not to fool people into thinking your positions and beliefs are sincere and genuine?

Seriously, what gives?
 
Trump most definitely obstructed justice. He confessed it to Lester Holt when he said he fired Comey "because of Russia." He said that two weeks before Mueller was named SC.

It doesn't matter to what degree.

on the other hand, he was just relieving a shitty biased agent of his duty, in accordance with the authority of his position.
 
a partisan hack is incapable of unbiased analysis as you demonstrate

No, I refuse to accept your post-hoc, personal standards as the defining standard in any conversation or debate, and the reason is because you're not a genuine person because you fall back on using multiple IDs to shield yourself from accountability.

You're a total coward.
 
on the other hand, he was just relieving a shitty biased agent of his duty, in accordance with the authority of his position.

No, he was trying to cover up his conspiracy with Russia because he knows what an FBI investigation will find.

Innocent people don't fire investigators looking into them. Innocent people welcome investigations.
 
No, I refuse to accept your post-hoc, personal standards as the defining standard in any conversation or debate, and the reason is because you're not a genuine person because you fall back on using multiple IDs to shield yourself from accountability.

You're a total coward.

and you're a total idiot. mic drop.
 
No, he was trying to cover up his conspiracy with Russia because he knows what an FBI investigation will find.

Innocent people don't fire investigators looking into them. Innocent people welcome investigations.

but they dont welcome witch hunts. how do you survive being so dumb?
 
For a witch hunt, he sure has caught a lot of witches so far.

How many guilty pleas and guilty charges already?




I'm not dumb.

You are not dumb either, just incredibly lazy and lacking of a strong work ethic.

yeah none of it has anything to do russia, or gates. unfortunately for you, you really are stupid.
 
I'm not attacking you by repeating what you've already admitted!

You're the one who said you have multiple IDs. So why would you have multiple IDs if not to fool people into thinking your positions and beliefs are sincere and genuine?

Seriously, what gives?
key word is deflection
 
LOL! You're just making shit up as you go to try and defend what is clearly an indefensible position and subject.

The only reason you are attempting to establish these personal standards of yours is that in actual terms, Trump is guilty as fuck and you don't want to look like a gullible idiot for defending him.

That's why you will create a new ID to argue a different strategy, like you've done before.
plenary powers are not "personal standards" -you are a partisan idiot for thinking so
 
n an interview with the Washington Post yesterday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that she opposed the impeachment of President Trump. This comes shortly before Mueller’s investigation into Trump-Russia collusion is expected to wrap up.

“I’m not for impeachment,” Pelosi told the Post.

The response to Pelosi’s remarks has been swift and strong.

“Wrong!” exclaimed MSNBC’s Russiagate con man Malcolm Nance via Twitter. “What the hell is wrong with the @SpeakerPelosi Congress that they absolve themselves of their duty! Nothing is criminal anymore?! Trump can do and say like a dictator as he pleases? All of his crimes are OK even if you see them? This requires a public outcry. #Disgraceful”

“I like Speaker Pelosi but this is NOT the right approach,” tweeted Michael Avenatti of Stormy Daniels fame. “If Trump has committed impeachable offenses, he must be charged and he must face a trial in the Senate. Would the Repubs take this approach? Hell no! And this is why we get outplayed.”

“Sorry, Madam Speaker,” tweeted Esquire’s Charles P Pierce. “If you really believe the president* is an unprecedented threat to the Constitution, your oath demands that you begin the process to remove him. It’s your job.”

Pelosi never said she opposed his impeachment you silly, drunken whore.

Your entire post, much like your entire history here, is a lie.
 
The Russian conspiracy is real, we just do not know who is involved. How many of Trump's people will be taken down by it? Individual 1 jr is in real trouble. Jared is in peril. Prince was involved. Manfort and Cohen too. Trumpies can shut their eyes and wish, if they need to. But the truth will come out and Daffy will not be happy.
 
yeah none of it has anything to do russia, or gates. unfortunately for you, you really are stupid.

A friendly reminder:
Trump’s campaign chairman: felon, and shown to have colluded with Russia
Trump’s deputy campaign chairman: felon and lied about Russia
Trump’s personal lawyer: felon
Trump’s former national security adviser: felon
Trump’s foreign policy adviser: felon

Please stop eating your own poo.
 
key word is deflection

Not at all, because the multiple ID question gets to the heart of your message board character and what you're trying to accomplish here, which is to create a false sense of certainty to protect your own ego from accountability.

It's why you have multiple IDs in the first place.

It's why you do what you do here...why you create so many IDs, and why you switch between those IDs regularly.

Everything you do here is deliberate. So there's a reason you switch between IDs as frequently as you do; I think the reason is pretty obvious.
 
Back
Top