Is Elite College Worth It? Maybe Not

cawacko said:
And I'm not checking anything since you clearly have the problem.
Click to expand...

Before copying the article, you put your own shitty, little cawacko spin on it to introduce the Op-Ed.

It was that introduction that I quoted and took issue with because it was inaccurate. Completely inaccurate. You didn't want to talk about how it was inaccurate, and all the posts where I explained how it was inaccurate you didn't even acknowledge or respond to.

What you did instead was say "well the Op-Ed says this and it's liberals so blah blah blah".

Cawacko...I'm not disputing what the author of the piece said, or what those quoted in the piece said, I was disputing your half-assed summary and introduction of it.
 
LV426 said:
Before copying the article, you put your own shitty, little cawacko spin on it to introduce the Op-Ed.

It was that introduction that I quoted and took issue with because it was inaccurate. Completely inaccurate. You didn't want to talk about how it was inaccurate, and all the posts where I explained how it was inaccurate you didn't even acknowledge or respond to.

What you did instead was say "well the Op-Ed says this and it's liberals so blah blah blah".

Cawacko...I'm not disputing what the author of the piece said, or what those quoted in the piece said, I was disputing your half-assed summary and introduction of it.
Click to expand...

You flat out LIED about what I wrote because you chose to misrepresent it. You lie repeatedly. It's what you do.
 
LV426 said:
I quoted you directly, man.

If you didn't mean what you said, why did you say it?

It's not a comprehension thing, it's a you not holding yourself accountable thing.
Click to expand...

You misrepresented it. You went ape shit because you couldn't understand something basic. You lost your sh*t kid.
 
cawacko said:
You flat out LIED about what I wrote because you chose to misrepresent it. You lie repeatedly. It's what you do.
Click to expand...

I didn't lie about anything, dude, I quoted you directly.

Literally, I quoted you. I didn't misrepresent anything, I quoted the exact words you wrote.

Conservatives always do this; they step in it and then try to back out with ambiguous appeals of "I was misrepresented" or "context" so you can play at being the victim because that is a position that you think entitles you to act like this.
 
LV426 said:
I didn't lie about anything, dude, I quoted you directly.

Literally, I quoted you. I didn't misrepresent anything, I quoted the exact words you wrote.

Conservatives always do this; they step in it and then try to back out with ambiguous appeals of "I was misrepresented" or "context" so you can play at being the victim because that is a position that you think entitles you to act like this.
Click to expand...

How many posts is this you are complaining and you still can't answer the actual question I asked. You have some personal issue. I have no desire to be a part of it in the future.
 
cawacko said:
How many posts is this you are complaining and you still can't answer the actual question I asked
Click to expand...

"ACCOMMODATE MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

Fuck you and fuck your dependency on accommodation.

Here's what you said:
cawacko said:
I'd argue the one variable left out is the major the student chooses. If you want to go into the business world is studying Psychology at Harvard going to help you much more than a Business major at State U? Probably not.
Click to expand...

And I responded to that by saying Psych majors have an average income that is tracks the national average, and that one of the four top employers for Psych Majors was Bank of America.

So that information completely contradicts what was obviously a preconceived and prejudicial notion about the value and employability of certain majors.

Then you walked that shit back by saying it was a "metaphor" (how?) and any major would fit there like History or English, both of which have average incomes at or above the national average, and both of which see Wall Street banks as top employers of people with those degrees.

So you see how fucking wrong you are about shit? How your inherent bias ends up fucking your argument up? Do you see that? No. Because you're a coddled crybaby who demands accommodation of your bad faith.
 
LV426 said:
"ACCOMMODATE MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

Fuck you and fuck your dependency on accommodation.

Here's what you said:

And I responded to that by saying Psych majors have an average income that is tracks the national average, and that one of the four top employers for Psych Majors was Bank of America.

So that information completely contradicts what was obviously a preconceived and prejudicial notion about the value and employability of certain majors.

Then you walked that shit back by saying it was a "metaphor" (how?) and any major would fit there like History or English, both of which have average incomes at or above the national average, and both of which see Wall Street banks as top employers of people with those degrees.

So you see how fucking wrong you are about shit? How your inherent bias ends up fucking your argument up? Do you see that? No. Because you're a coddled crybaby who demands accommodation of your bad faith.
Click to expand...

it doesn't completely contradict anything, you buffoon.

college now is just a way to keep people in extended adolescnce so they don't realize the world is fucked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top