What a great question

Mueller’s report explicitly avoids the word “collusion,” instead noting that investigators did not conclude that there was a criminal conspiracy between Trump’s team and Russia.

The report, which you're too frightened to read, states that the investigation “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities”

That isn't a conclusion or statement that collusion did not occur. It's a finding that the probe did not establish an illicit conspiracy.

Please be less fucking stupid, just this once.

The conspiracy is the legal term for collusion. :pke:
 
Perhaps we should just impeach him for lying- like the way they impeached Bill Clinton.

Let's get him on the stand and see if Donald wants to lie to Congress about his affairs!

That seems fair enough, don't you think?
go for it..please please..you know you want it..it makes you feel righteous.. do it do it..
 
since when does innocence need to be proven?? you are PRESUMED INNOCENT..
my gawd..does anyone have any clues anymore?? ( not you OWL -Dems in general)

My statement was an echo of what we heard here when the Mueller report came out. Most of the RWers started hollering that Trump is innocent, and others that he was exonerated. As it turns out, Mueller did not say that he was exonerated. And he punted the obstruction issue.
 
My statement was an echo of what we heard here when the Mueller report came out. Most of the RWers started hollering that Trump is innocent, and others that he was exonerated. As it turns out, Mueller did not say that he was exonerated. And he punted the obstruction issue.
Mueller is a hack who wants it both ways.. considering the certainty of Russian collusion and the crap Trump supporters have had to put up with ( while the border spasms from simple lack of legislation), and delusions of "manufactured crisis" since Trump took Office - I'm not all that upset if the RW did a victory dance on declaring innocence

afterall the LW will not declare him cleared of collusion and obstruction ( the legal standard)- forget "exoneration"
 
Nor did he say he was guilty of obstruction. Democrats want to ignore that.

Mullet could have indicted Trump for obstruction.

Whether the indictment would stand would create a constitutional ‘crisis’ [the term is over used] but there was nothing preventing Mullet from indicting Trump and letting the courts sort it out. And he would have done the Trump haters a big favor.

Bit Mullet pussied out on making the call. He ended up even weaseling the democrats.
 
go for it..please please..you know you want it..it makes you feel righteous.. do it do it..

You do realize that if Donald Trump gets impeached, he can no longer be elected for a 2nd term- don't you?

Like I sad, what's the hurry?

The House can impeach Donald Trump anytime they choose!

We all know he has cooked his own goose! And that you can put a fork in him, as he is about done!

Turkey-Trump-Twerk.gif
 
You do realize that if Donald Trump gets impeached, he can no longer be elected for a 2nd term- don't you?

Like I sad, what's the hurry?

The House can impeach Donald Trump anytime they choose!

We all know he has cooked his own goose! And that you can put a fork in him, as he is about done!
Have you tried lithium? Lithium helps reduce the severity and frequency of mania i.e.TDS
 
My statement was an echo of what we heard here when the Mueller report came out. Most of the RWers started hollering that Trump is innocent, and others that he was exonerated. As it turns out, Mueller did not say that he was exonerated. And he punted the obstruction issue.

Ever wonder why lol?

Maybe Mullet suspects Barr’s investigation and the IG report will turn up some unpleasant things—even though some could argue Trump obstructed the investigation.

I’d be tempted to punt on it too, under the circumstances.
 
Back
Top