Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!

[LV426]

Prove the discussion didn't happen.

Look at you fucking scramble as you demand I accommodate your bad faith and prove a negative.

Barr lied about receiving communication from Mueller.

Now you're trying to use the excuse that Barr didn't know from where this letter came?

Do you expect anyone to believe that when we can just look at the letter and see that it came directly from Mueller and his office?

 

[Southern Chicken]

‘And he said that they were concerned about the way the media was playing this and felt that it was important to get out the summaries, which they felt would put their work in proper context and avoid some of the confusion that was emerging," Barr added.”

Indeed

Indeed

 

[Southern Chicken]

Look at you fucking scramble as you demand I accommodate your bad faith and prove a negative.

Barr lied about receiving communication from Mueller.

Now you're trying to use the excuse that Barr didn't know from where this letter came?

Do you expect anyone to believe that when we can just look at the letter and see that it came directly from Mueller and his office?

14% of the House believes you. Barr contacted Mueller for clarity.

"And he said that they were concerned about the way the media was playing this and felt that it was important to get out the summaries, which they felt would put their work in proper context and avoid some of the confusion that was emerging," Barr added."


Mueller didn't dispute that the conversation happened.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/441655-barr-on-mueller-bob-whats-with-the-letter


Anything else is your fantasy

 

[LV426]

Barr said he contacted Mueller to clarify the letter.

When did he say that? Link or lie.

Barr was asked by the Senate on April 20th if he had received any communication from Mueller's office regarding Barr's summary of Mueller's report.

Barr responded that he hadn't.

But the truth is that he had, at least twice. One of those letters was even made public.

So why did Barr lie?

 

[LV426]

No collusion

So then what would you call Manafort sharing polling data with Russian spies for months while he was campaign manager?

 

[LV426]

Neither.

But you've been caught lying.

You lied when Barr couldn't "source" the letter he got directly from Mueller's office on March 28th.

Why did Barr lie about receiving that letter, and why are you lying about the presence of that letter's source?

 

[Southern Chicken]

1. Trump didn't say that under oath...he refuses to testify under oath. Gee, I wonder why.

2. Trump is a liar.

Only 14% of the members of the house supports the above as a reason for impeachment.

 

[LV426]

Barr says he asked Mueller: 'Bob, what's with the letter?'

This is retconning because it's Barr's explanation now, after having committed perjury in April.

 

[Wolverine]

If the poor senile old shit wins again, it will be evidence of the final degeneracy of America, which has been strongly suggested for some years now by his vacant supporters here and elsewhere, beating their poor, spotty, hollow chests and squeaking fiercely!

You support baby murder, homosexuality(mental illness) transgender(mental illness) and coveting, tell me again how we are degenerate.

 

[LV426]

"And he said that they were concerned about the way the media was playing this and felt that it was important to get out the summaries, which they felt would put their work in proper context and avoid some of the confusion that was emerging,"

Right...Barr didn't put Mueller's summaries out there.

He put his own out there and tried to misrepresent them as Mueller's.

That's what prompted Mueller's letters.

Why did Barr lie on April 20th to the Senate, and why are you lying for him now?

 

[Southern Chicken]

But you've been caught lying.

You lied when Barr couldn't "source" the letter he got directly from Mueller's office on March 28th.

Why did Barr lie about receiving that letter, and why are you lying about the presence of that letter's source?

That is a quote.

Barr slammed the letter’s tone on Wednesday, suggesting that Mueller did not write it himself.

"The letter’s a bit snitty, and I think it was probably written by one of his staff people," he told the Judiciary panel


https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/441655-barr-on-mueller-bob-whats-with-the-letter

 

[LV426]

Barr says he asked Mueller: 'Bob, what's with the letter?'

Attorney General William Barr on Wednesday recalled a conversation he had with special counsel Robert Mueller after the special counsel voiced concerns to him in a letter.

Barr told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that he was surprised Mueller didn’t simply call him over his concerns about a summary the attorney general sent to Congress in late March about the 22-month probe.

"I said, 'Bob, what’s with the letter? Why don’t you just pick up the phone and call me if there’s an issue?'" Barr said during his testimony before the panel Wednesday.

"And he said that they were concerned about the way the media was playing this and felt that it was important to get out the summaries, which they felt would put their work in proper context and avoid some of the confusion that was emerging," Barr added.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/441655-barr-on-mueller-bob-whats-with-the-letter

This link of yours is after the fact that Barr had already lied before the Senate in April.

Barr got two letters from Mueller, one of those letters has been made public.

Before this link of yours, and before Barr retconned what happened, Barr lied to the Senate. He told the Senate on April 20th that he hadn't received any communication from Mueller. That was untrue. It was only after that exchange before the Senate did this new defense of yours emerge.

 

[Truth Detector]

It totally and completely does.
Why did Barr lie to the Senate in April about getting that letter from Mueller?

He didn't; NEXT!

 

[Truth Detector]

Let me stop you right there...

Barr has no credibility, and lied before the Senate in April.

So I don't understand why you continue using Barr in your defense when you already acknowledge in your links that Barr lied to the Senate and that he misrepresented Mueller's report?

Why did Barr lie about his communication with Mueller?

These are questions that will have to be answered.

He didn't lie; NEXT

 

[Truth Detector]

This link of yours is after the fact that Barr had already lied before the Senate in April.

Barr got two letters from Mueller, one of those letters has been made public.

Before this link of yours, and before Barr retconned what happened, Barr lied to the Senate. He told the Senate on April 20th that he hadn't received any communication from Mueller. That was untrue. It was only after that exchange before the Senate did this new defense of yours emerge.

He didn't lie; NEXT!

 

[Southern Chicken]

This is retconning because it's Barr's explanation now, after having committed perjury in April.

Then we have
"Barr’s response suggests his defense: He understood Crist to be asking if he knew anything about concerns raised by members of Mueller’s team, not by Mueller himself. And Barr had only heard directly from Mueller."

https://www.lawfareblog.com/there-perjury-case-against-barr

Please read the link. What does the last sentence say?

 

[LV426]

Attorney General William Barr on Wednesday recalled a conversation he had with special counsel Robert Mueller after the special counsel voiced concerns to him in a letter.

OK, so let's do a little due diligence into your defense here;

1. "On Wednesday" = April 24th at the earliest (the article you semi-linked to is dated May 1st).

2. Barr said to the Senate on April 20th that he hadn't received any communication from Mueller about his summary of Mueller's report.

3. Barr is now saying that he suddenly remembered a conversation -that he couldn't recall on April 20th- with Mueller that a) doesn't fit within the timeline, and b) doesn't explain why Barr lied on April 20th.

4. Barr's recollection only happened after Mueller's March 27th letter was released.

So the timeline doesn't match Barr's explanations; hence, why he has no credibility.

 

[LV426]

‘And he said that they were concerned about the way the media was playing this and felt that it was important to get out the summaries, which they felt would put their work in proper context and avoid some of the confusion that was emerging," Barr added.”

Indeed

Yeah, Barr didn't release Mueller's Executive Summaries...he released his own.

 

[LV426]

I didnt interview Manafort

Well, you like to think of yourself as a smart, savvy guy with good instincts and sound judgment, right?

So put those instincts and judgment to work and think of a reason why Manafort, as campaign chair, would share polling data for PA, WI, MI, and MN with Russian spies.

 

[Southern Chicken]

OK, so let's do a little due diligence into your defense here;

1. "On Wednesday" = April 24th at the earliest (the article you semi-linked to is dated May 1st).

2. Barr said to the Senate on April 20th that he hadn't received any communication from Mueller about his summary of Mueller's report.

3. Barr is now saying that he suddenly remembered a conversation -that he couldn't recall on April 20th- with Mueller that a) doesn't fit within the timeline, and b) doesn't explain why Barr lied on April 20th.

4. Barr's recollection only happened after Mueller's March 27th letter was released.

So the timeline doesn't match Barr's explanations; hence, why he has no credibility.

Bottom line I answered your question based on facts.


Barr’s response suggests his defense: He understood Crist to be asking if he knew anything about concerns raised by members of Mueller’s team, not by Mueller himself. And Barr had only heard directly from Mueller.

The attorney general’s comment later in the May 1 hearing that he thought the Mueller letter “was probably written by one of his staff people” complicates the explanation he provided to Durbin. But he could also argue that he understood Crist’s question about “what they’re referencing” to refer to the sources behind the media reports, or what specifically those unknown sources had told reporters—rather than the concerns of Mueller and his team.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/there-perjury-case-against-barr