I once tried to learn Russian...gave up the first day. No one can learn Russian. Even the translators are just pretending.Let’s keep in mind that I’m the lead Russian troll. Thanks lol!
Regarding Mullet allegedly tampering with evidence to nail Trump: that’s some serious shyte. Mullet needs an interview by Durham.
"No collusion, insufficient evidence to pursue obstruction."
Innocent until proven guilty.
McConnell-"Case closed."
Just like many democrats
But I don’t need to read it to know that Muller didn’t indict anyone for conspiracy or obstruction. Nobody
You're not educating; you're attempting to dumb everything down to your low IQ level.
That's not merely a dumb statement; but moronic.
For what? Winning an election?
The only way sharing polling data was doing Kilimnik "a favor" was if Kilimnik was going to share that polling data with Russian Intelligence who would use it to direct troll attacks so Trump would be elected and their one-sided "peace plan" can be put into effect.
Otherwise, how is it a favor to Kilimnik to share the polling data with him?
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
34 business and individuals were indicted, resulting in over 150+ charges and convictions and over $40M seized.
You're lying because you're desperate.
Trump is making you carry his baggage. What a sucker.
To find out what happened so we know how to act. Trump can't be indicted, but we can impeach him.
34 business and individuals were indicted for crimes related to what's in the Mueller report.
There are also 13 or 14 other current investigations you don't even know about.
So the question is why are you lying?
But it ain't going to happen.
![]()
He won’t answer it lol.
But you want the short answer or the long answer?
This is why you goof balls don’t want me to read Mullet’s report lol.
Note that that was something they *concluded* from the principles outlined in DOJ policy.
IOW, that’s Mullet’s interpretation of the policy. So rather than simply saying the evidence was insufficient for ANY charge against Trump, Mullet used DOJ policy as a means to give the impression that he would have concluded Trump’s actions were worthy of indictment.
Except for that darn DOJ policy lol!

Is it just me; but has the Living Victim gone completely postal, as of late??
I once tried to learn Russian...gave up the first day. No one can learn Russian. Even the translators are just pretending.
Serious mierda, indeed.
Wrong, cunt. I WANT you to read it instead of continually posting out of ignorance. How many times have I provided the site to you illiterate assholes?
https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-con...-04.18.2019-Word-Searchable.-Reduced-Size.pdf
Read page 28 below, moron.
https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/olc/092473.pdf
You fucking idiots continually use “In Other Words” and miss the mark every time.
Losers.![]()
Always the same thing over and over again lol.
Your second link is about initiating criminal proceedings against a sitting president. Who said anything about that?? For 35 million dollars of tax payer money, all we asked of Mullet was to make a simple yes/no *determination* on Trump’s guilt/innocence in collusion and obstruction.
Can we get our money back?
The day I read the Mullet report I’ll come back here and dissect it for you.
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
But he indicted NOBODY. NOT ONE PERSON
what does DOJ policy say about the Presidents son asswipe?
NOBODY WAS INDICTED FOR OBSTRUCTION. NOT JUST TRUMP. BUT NOBODY
