No collusion. Why can't you accept the truth and go back to being a good little boy?
When you start asking "why?", their defense falls apart
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
No collusion. Why can't you accept the truth and go back to being a good little boy?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Fucking idiot.
34 indictments. How many of Trump's inner circle are now in jail?
Mueller determine there was insufficient proof on Juniors intent.
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller said he considered charging President Donald Trump’s eldest son and other participants in a June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with campaign-finance violations but chose not to because of a high bar to prove they intended to break the law.
"Mueller’s decision not to charge Donald Trump Jr. or anyone else at the gathering, including Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, was based in part on a lack of evidence about their state of mind when they agreed to meet a Kremlin-linked lawyer who promised dirt on Hillary Clinton, the special counsel said in his report released Thursday."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-18/donald-trump-jr-mueller-report
In other words, Junior was too fucking stupid to realize he was doing something illegal.
How many for "COLLUSION" or "OBSTRUCTION"??
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Coming to a simple yes/no determination on obstruction or collusion is ‘ousting a president’ lol?
Read it again, slower this time.
Trump didn't collude and no conspiracy. Why do you keep lying?
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Of course there was collusion!
Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik.
Why would he do that?
How did he do that? You said he lied...how? We've all heard the audio.
That Turmp Tower meeting was literally what Trump said he'd be OK doing yesterday to George Stephanopolous; sit with foreign governments to get dirt on his opponent and not tell the FBI.
That's collusion.
You're desperate to give fake, vague, broad, ambiguous non-answers to questions you cannot answer because of what it means for your defense.
Why else would you be arguing pro-Putin positions from 1000 different accounts and IDs?
Most Democrats have read it, which is why we're asking questions like why did Manafort share polling data with Kilimnik?
Say...why did Manafort do that, anyway?
Because Trump was the one who committed those crimes, and Mueller said he couldn't indict Trump because of the OLC and DOJ rules.
So we keep going around in circles here; you lie and tell a half-truth, then I have to correct the record because of your sophistry.
What a slob.
Try again, illiterate dumbshit. Rather tha live in your own mind's fantasy world, actually read Mueller's mission.
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...r-special.html
This is annatta, noise, cosmic rocker and no telling who else.
I can tell his post even when he tries to hide it.
It's a technique that Conservatives have been trying to perfect ever since they stapled teabags to their faces 10 years ago to pretend to care about a topic none of them cared about during Bush the Dumber.
They astortuf everywhere...they create 1000s of accounts, like anatta does, so they can pretend and posture that there's more support for their positions and beliefs than there actually is.
Yeah...you all say Trump is innocent because Mueller didn't indict him, then we say he didn't indict him because of the OLC and DOJ rules Mueller mentions over and over.
So we keep going in circles because you are being dishonest.
Why are you being dishonest? Do you have something personal at stake here? Seems like the thing you're most worried about is what it means for your judgment if it turns out Trump conned you.
You did.
You're the ones who are saying that because Mueller didn't indict Trump, it means Trump didn't commit a crime.
But the part you leave out is that Mueller didn't indict Trump because he couldn't, according to the DOJ and OLC rules under which he was operating.
So why are you continuing to lie?
What is your endgame? Cuz you're not going to be able to put on a gauntlet and snap the Mueller report away into dust.
That wasn't the mission of the Special Counsel. That's you trying to retcon the mission, post-hoc, because you cannot speak to anything in the Mueller Report...because you haven't read it.
So...you're going to give the over $40M in assets seized from Manafort back to him?
Why do you want to do that? Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik, a known Russian asset.
Wrong, he indicted 34 people and businesses, across 150+ charges and convictions, seizing more than $40M in assets, and putting several members of Trump's inner circle behind bars, while getting the AG to perjure himself before the Senate.
What's your defense of all that?