Trump calls on foreign countries to protect their own oil tankers

moon said:
No- these tankers were mined in port. There are other suspects. Further, Iran is not the aggressor .
Click to expand...
not necessarily. limpet mines can be attached by patrol boat. I'm not sue if they were used in the tanker war,
but the logistics and locations clearly show it was Iran

2000-29.jpeg

This June 13, 2019, image released by the U.S. military's Central Command, shows damage and a suspected mine on the Kokuka Courageous in the Gulf of Oman near the coast of Iran. The U.S. military on Friday, June 14, 2019, released a video it said showed Iran's Revolutionary Guard removing an unexploded limpet mine from one of the oil tankers targeted near the Strait of Hormuz, suggesting the Islamic Republic sought to remove evidence of its involvement from the scene
 
No- this is conjecture. You are calling a ' Likely black blob ' a mine.
The more of this obvious nonsense that appears the more likely it is that Iran is being framed.
 
Fuck that...make the companies pay to protect their own oil tankers.

The US Navy isn't security for oil companies.
 
anatta said:
there is evidence of the patrol boats,the limpet mine attached by such,
and being so close to Iran can only be Iranian deployment
Click to expand...

No- Iranian patrol boats are patrolling. It's what they do. There is no credible evidence of any Iranian involvement and Iran being close to the Gulf does not constitute guilt.
Your claims would melt within minutes in a court.
 
Bill said:
That should be the focus, not pretending you have some inside secret knowledge to sell books etc....
Click to expand...

It IS the focus among Christians. No secrecy at all; it's right there in the Word.
But, not so much of a focus of the charlatans.
 
moon said:
No- Iranian patrol boats are patrolling. It's what they do. There is no credible evidence of any Iranian involvement and Iran being close to the Gulf does not constitute guilt.
Your claims would melt within minutes in a court.
Click to expand...

And, there's no credible evidence of a U.S. Navy drone being over Iranian airspace and
the U.S. being close does not constitute guilt.
 
Stretch said:
And, there's no credible evidence of a U.S. Navy drone being over Iranian airspace and
the U.S. being close does not constitute guilt.
Click to expand...

Well that's it you see- the Russians have announced , at a high-level international security meeting at which John Bolton is present- that they have military-grade proof that the drone was destroyed in Iranian airspace.
YOUR only hope, under such circumstances, is to claim that Iranian airspace is in dispute. Haw, haw..............haw.
 
moon said:
Well that's it you see- the Russians have announced , at a high-level international security meeting at which John Bolton is present- that they have military-grade proof that the drone was destroyed in Iranian airspace.
YOUR only hope, under such circumstances, is to claim that Iranian airspace is in dispute. Haw, haw..............haw.
Click to expand...

All I want to see are the coordinates of the drone when it was hit and the coordinates
that outline Iranian airspace. Guess I'll still have to wait.
 
Stretch said:
All I want to see are the coordinates of the drone when it was hit and the coordinates
that outline Iranian airspace. Guess I'll still have to wait.
Click to expand...

For sure. He will prance his way around everything else instead of answering what he states as facts.
 
moon said:
No- this is conjecture. You are calling a ' Likely black blob ' a mine.
The more of this obvious nonsense that appears the more likely it is that Iran is being framed.
Click to expand...

Then what other country was in Iran's grill that day? In their space? Any reports of Iran retaliating against them for being there?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top