I'm not saying it should be legal to physically attack people. I'm saying it should be legal to associate with who you want.
So freedom is now for the right wing conservatives a one way street in which every tom dick and harriet can discriminate. How nice is that. Righties need to wear a hat that says 'we discriminate based on anything at all' so that we know who they are and just how un-American they are. We'll still serve them as we are still Americans, they on the other hand are....
Then you didn't think about OWH's metaphor.
And California thinks people in your public restaurant should also. Public establishments should not be treated by their owners like a Southern gated community in 1945
with restrictive covenants.
They always have felt that way. And it gets worse. They wish to privatize everything so an ownership class can infuse all 3d space coast to coast with their prejudices.
You people are so stupid. When I read an article that cites a statute, the first thing I do is look at the text, read the statutory framework,
and see what this text does to amend the scheme, then think about the effects.
Cf you children. The first thing you do is to get outraged, have a tantrum and post pictures of aryans with ethnic hair.
Aren't you even marginally aware you are being manipulated by the media? Go to the source material and read it, often times you
will find your prejudicial outrage will be diminished through the power of knowledge. Try it ONCE.
So basically, no freedom of association. Bullshit like this is why Trump is going to get reelected.
No. Piss off of people's autonomy and businesses. Problem solved.
So freedom is now for the right wing conservatives a one way street in which every tom dick and harriet can discriminate. How nice is that. Righties need to wear a hat that says 'we discriminate based on anything at all' so that we know who they are and just how un-American they are. We'll still serve them as we are still Americans, they on the other hand are....
Good. Maybe the other states should follow suit. Then we won't have crap like this:
"An Albuquerque teacher is no longer working for a school district after cutting off a Native American student's braid and calling another a "bloody Indian." (https://www.newsweek.com/new-mexico...-students-braid-called-another-bloody-1242722)
and
"7-year-old Lamya Cammon was playing with her hair in class, like most 7-year-old girls do, when her Congress Elementary school teacher asked her to stop. The teacher then called her to the front of the class where she cut one of Lamya’s braids in half and sent her back to her desk. Wait, she did what? Yes, you read that correctly. The teacher cut one of her braids off as a punishment in front of her classmates." (https://hellobeautiful.com/2753110/teacher-cuts-off-students-hair/)
Apparently it's not the hair that's the problem -- it's racist teachers.
Feel free to introduce that piece of legislation.
The statute was inspired by exactly this concern ^^^ A young athlete was told he could not participate in wrestling unless he cut off his hair.
Another freedom taken from us. A private business should be free to refuse service or employment to anyone for any reason.
I think I'll wait for CA to wreck its economy, first.
The statute was inspired by exactly this concern ^^^ A young athlete was told he could not participate in wrestling unless he cut off his hair.
...which miraculously is more productive than any.
Isn't it amazing the paradox? Were you aware that in history the most egregiously repressive regimes ever were the MOST productive?
The USSR practically carried the industrial revolution. They mopped the floor with us!
grok some on it while hyperventilating