California becomes first state to ban hairstyle discrimination

So freedom is now for the right wing conservatives a one way street in which every tom dick and harriet can discriminate. How nice is that. Righties need to wear a hat that says 'we discriminate based on anything at all' so that we know who they are and just how un-American they are. We'll still serve them as we are still Americans, they on the other hand are....
 
I'm not saying it should be legal to physically attack people. I'm saying it should be legal to associate with who you want.

Then you didn't think about OWH's metaphor.

And California thinks people in your public restaurant should also. Public establishments should not be treated by their owners like a Southern gated community in 1945
with restrictive covenants.
 
A lib forced to hire these 2...LOL

download (2).jpg

a31cae9d-a07c-4e25-90b5-b8fb2d47dd5c-jamiecallowaymug.jpg

Cmon Libs hire one of these freaks to greet your customers and if u dont want too the state should force you...right?
 
Last edited:
So freedom is now for the right wing conservatives a one way street in which every tom dick and harriet can discriminate. How nice is that. Righties need to wear a hat that says 'we discriminate based on anything at all' so that we know who they are and just how un-American they are. We'll still serve them as we are still Americans, they on the other hand are....

They always have felt that way. And it gets worse. They wish to privatize everything so an ownership class can infuse all 3d space coast to coast with their prejudices.
 
Then you didn't think about OWH's metaphor.

And California thinks people in your public restaurant should also. Public establishments should not be treated by their owners like a Southern gated community in 1945
with restrictive covenants.

As a white, I wouldn't care is a black owned business posted a sign that said "No Whites Allowed". I'd gladly go elsewhere. Why, if it's the other way around, do blacks get their panties in a wad?
 
They always have felt that way. And it gets worse. They wish to privatize everything so an ownership class can infuse all 3d space coast to coast with their prejudices.

I'm all for blacke-owned, Hispanic owned, etc. businesses being able to exclude whites. A business should be able to do so if they wish.
 
You people are so stupid. When I read an article that cites a statute, the first thing I do is look at the text, read the statutory framework,
and see what this text does to amend the scheme, then think about the effects.

Cf you children. The first thing you do is to get outraged, have a tantrum and post pictures of aryans with ethnic hair.
Aren't you even marginally aware you are being manipulated by the media? Go to the source material and read it, often times you
will find your prejudicial outrage will be diminished through the power of knowledge. Try it ONCE.

No. Piss off of people's autonomy and businesses. Problem solved.
 
Good. Maybe the other states should follow suit. Then we won't have crap like this:

"An Albuquerque teacher is no longer working for a school district after cutting off a Native American student's braid and calling another a "bloody Indian." (https://www.newsweek.com/new-mexico...-students-braid-called-another-bloody-1242722)

and

"7-year-old Lamya Cammon was playing with her hair in class, like most 7-year-old girls do, when her Congress Elementary school teacher asked her to stop. The teacher then called her to the front of the class where she cut one of Lamya’s braids in half and sent her back to her desk. Wait, she did what? Yes, you read that correctly. The teacher cut one of her braids off as a punishment in front of her classmates." (https://hellobeautiful.com/2753110/teacher-cuts-off-students-hair/)

Apparently it's not the hair that's the problem -- it's racist teachers.
 
So basically, no freedom of association. Bullshit like this is why Trump is going to get reelected.

Probably, with your help that is, lots of breathing into paper sacks, clutching of pearls and imagery of black savages screwing virgin white girls
and very little reading of statutes. I know the game.

Eventually civilization wins though. That's why California leads and you people inevitably follow.
 
So freedom is now for the right wing conservatives a one way street in which every tom dick and harriet can discriminate. How nice is that. Righties need to wear a hat that says 'we discriminate based on anything at all' so that we know who they are and just how un-American they are. We'll still serve them as we are still Americans, they on the other hand are....

Any business, regardless of who owns it, should be able to choose to do business with or not do business with anyone of their choosing. If a black owned business wanted to post a sign and not serve whites, I'm OK with that.
 
Good. Maybe the other states should follow suit. Then we won't have crap like this:

"An Albuquerque teacher is no longer working for a school district after cutting off a Native American student's braid and calling another a "bloody Indian." (https://www.newsweek.com/new-mexico...-students-braid-called-another-bloody-1242722)

and

"7-year-old Lamya Cammon was playing with her hair in class, like most 7-year-old girls do, when her Congress Elementary school teacher asked her to stop. The teacher then called her to the front of the class where she cut one of Lamya’s braids in half and sent her back to her desk. Wait, she did what? Yes, you read that correctly. The teacher cut one of her braids off as a punishment in front of her classmates." (https://hellobeautiful.com/2753110/teacher-cuts-off-students-hair/)

Apparently it's not the hair that's the problem -- it's racist teachers.

The statute was inspired by exactly this concern ^^^ A young athlete was told he could not participate in wrestling unless he cut off his hair.
 
The statute was inspired by exactly this concern ^^^ A young athlete was told he could not participate in wrestling unless he cut off his hair.

A coach should be able to set such standards. If you don't like the standards, become the next coach or don't participate.
 
I think I'll wait for CA to wreck its economy, first.

...which miraculously is more productive than any.

Isn't it amazing the paradox? Were you aware that in history the most egregiously repressive regimes ever were the MOST productive?
The USSR practically carried the industrial revolution. They mopped the floor with us!

grok some on it while hyperventilating
 
The statute was inspired by exactly this concern ^^^ A young athlete was told he could not participate in wrestling unless he cut off his hair.

I have several NA friends in both real life and in the cyber world. The thing about their children -- especially boys -- wearing braids and having issues with school personnel is a problem in a lot of areas, including Canadian schools.
 
...which miraculously is more productive than any.

Isn't it amazing the paradox? Were you aware that in history the most egregiously repressive regimes ever were the MOST productive?
The USSR practically carried the industrial revolution. They mopped the floor with us!

grok some on it while hyperventilating

Yet the USSR no longer exists. Interesting how all that productivity resulted in extinction.
 
Back
Top