Lower IQ produces Racists and Conservatives

StoneByStone said:
Because only smart and knowledgeable people should be picking the president.
Click to expand...

Well, then 62 million people should then be disqualified since they were so stupid, they picked Trump.


I don't want retards who vote based on who they'd like to have a beer with voting.
Click to expand...

Well, if more people voted, the dumbass vote would be overwhelmed.

Why fight for a sliver of the pie when you can just make the pie larger so that sliver is less appealing?
 
StoneByStone said:
Actually, classic Liberals have higher IQ rates than Conservatives.
Click to expand...
FTFY
4. We actually are smarter than you
The Triple Nine Society, an organization whose membership is reserved for people with IQ’s in the top one tenth of one percent, even more discriminating than Mensa, did a survey on the politics of its members. The results don’t surprise us. Members overwhelmingly supported legalizing all drugs, prostitution, and gambling. They supported gun rights, and free markets. They opposed government involvement in medicine, and income taxes.

Government is a scam, and like other scams it relies on the gullibility of its victims. We’re not falling for it, but you are, and your support of that system harms us. Your stupidity literally hurts.
https://christophercantwell.com/2014/04/08/top-10-reasons-libertarians-arent-nice/
Click to expand...
.
 
Stretch said:
So working citizens should not vote? OK. Got it:palm:
Click to expand...

Notice I said "live entirely off welfare." If someone has a job, but they're still not making enough to survive, and they get welfare money, they should still be allowed to vote as long as they have at least an average IQ.
Now if someone doesn't work and isn't contributing at all, they shouldn't be voting.
 
StoneByStone said:
Notice I said "live entirely off welfare." If someone has a job, but they're still not making enough to survive, and they get welfare money, they should still be allowed to vote as long as they have at least an average IQ.
Now if someone doesn't work and isn't contributing at all, they shouldn't be voting.
Click to expand...

You stated:
"No, I'd be all for revoking a person's right to vote if they live entirely off welfare."

So, if a person is entirely self-sufficient and working and they live entirely without getting any welfare.......those person's right to vote should be revoked according to you.
 
anonymoose said:
FTFY
.
Click to expand...

Liberals support legalizing drugs, prostitution, and gambling. Conservatives generally don't.
Liberals also support guns rights, they just want moderate gun control. They also support free markets. Notice that the freest markets in the world are all in liberal countries. Conservatives and Liberals both believe in some government regulations, the difference is that Conservatives want that regulation to help the rich, and Liberals want that regulation to help the working-class. Anyone who tells you they don't want any regulations is full of shit, because Conservatives ONLY kick up a fuss when the regulations help the working-class.

I checked the link and I'm going to call bullshit because Libertarians are literally the dumbest people. Worse than Communists, worse than Fascists, worse than Cucksaders, they're literally just too stupid to take their pants off before pooping.
 
Stretch said:
You stated:
"No, I'd be all for revoking a person's right to vote if they live entirely off welfare."

So, if a person is entirely self-sufficient and working and they live entirely without getting any welfare.......those person's right to vote should be revoked according to you.
Click to expand...

:laugh:

Reread my quote that YOU quoted. I'd be all for revoking a person's right to vote IF THEY LIVE ENTIRELY OFF WELFARE.

Of course if a person doesn't get any welfare, and they have an average or higher IQ, they should vote.
 
StoneByStone said:
Liberals support legalizing drugs, prostitution, and gambling. Conservatives generally don't.
Liberals also support guns rights, they just want moderate gun control. They also support free markets. Notice that the freest markets in the world are all in liberal countries.
Click to expand...
That's me. I've been saying for yrs. on forums that I'm a liberal.
StoneByStone said:
Conservatives and Liberals both believe in some government regulations, the difference is that Conservatives want that regulation to help the rich, and Liberals want that regulation to help the working-class. Anyone who tells you they don't want any regulations is full of shit, because Conservatives ONLY kick up a fuss when the regulations help the working-class.
Click to expand...
Hmmm. I'm a classical liberal. Not a conservative or what you call liberal. Neither pertain to me.
StoneByStone said:
I checked the link and I'm going to call bullshit because Libertarians are literally the dumbest people. Worse than Communists, worse than Fascists, worse than Cucksaders, they're literally just too stupid to take their pants off before pooping.
Click to expand...
Link?
 
Last edited:
LV426 said:
Well, then 62 million people should then be disqualified since they were so stupid, they picked Trump.




Well, if more people voted, the dumbass vote would be overwhelmed.

Why fight for a sliver of the pie when you can just make the pie larger so that sliver is less appealing?
Click to expand...

Because the more people vote, the more shitty politicians we get. We get people like Trump who play to the lowest common traits in people.
 
Donald Trump keeps cooking his own goose!

But, you can put a fork in him as he is just about done! 2020 is almost here!

Turkey-Trump-Twerk.gif
 
Stretch said:
You stated:
"No, I'd be all for revoking a person's right to vote if they live entirely off welfare."

So, if a person is entirely self-sufficient and working and they live entirely without getting any welfare.......those person's right to vote should be revoked according to you.
Click to expand...


"No, I'd be all for revoking a person's right to vote if they live entirely off welfare."

Try reading that harder. If you still don't understand, have a smarter person explain it to you.

ENTIRELY OFF WELFARE. As in they're not working, and they're living off the money the government is sending them.
 
StoneByStone said:
:laugh:

Reread my quote that YOU quoted. I'd be all for revoking a person's right to vote IF THEY LIVE ENTIRELY OFF WELFARE.

Of course if a person doesn't get any welfare, and they have an average or higher IQ, they should vote.
Click to expand...

Reading what is highlighted. You would take away the right to vote for a person who is NOT on welfare in any way!
Example...I have been entirely OFF of any kind of welfare for my entire life, NEVER been on it, always employed...
so you would take way MY right to vote.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top