even michael moore admits democrats today totally blew it

Earl said:
Chuck Todd on Mueller: ‘Complete Failure,’ Dems Can’t ‘Combat’ Right’s ‘Propaganda Machine’

No propaganda needed. Mueller was the Democrats’s worst nightmare.
Click to expand...
It's all propaganda.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
dukkha said:
nobody is ignoring Russian meddling -it would help if it was put into perspective that it was amateurish efforts,
changed no votes, and paled compared to the meddling we did in the Russian Yeltsin election.

However anyone with 1/2 a brain would also understand Russian collusion was almost an impossibility
and would mean Putin and Trump were fools - neither are fools.

Maybe one day we'll understand the damage Russiaphobia has done to our country-
driving Russia and and China into economic and strategic military alliance
Click to expand...

Russian meddling involved hundreds of bots posting fake news on social media. It certainly influenced a lot of votes. Russian collusion was a reality. There were documented meetings between the Trump campaign and Russian agents.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
Russian meddling involved hundreds of bots posting fake news on social media. It certainly influenced a lot of votes.
Click to expand...
in your dreams..
it was $1.5 billion PAID MONEY election not to mention all the free coverage,and you are gonna claim FB bots
changed votes?? ROFL
Russian collusion was a reality. There were documented meetings between the Trump campaign and Russian agents.
Click to expand...
a meeting is not collusion -even Mueller agrees
 
rjhenn said:
The usual wishful thinking. What's clear is that Mueller didn't exonerate Trump.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

What's clear is Meuller is just a hand puppet worked by the likes of Weissman. He was leaking to the likes of the NYT and then quoting them in part 2.
 
Havana Moon said:
What's clear is Meuller is just a hand puppet worked by the likes of Weissman. He was leaking to the likes of the NYT and then quoting them in part 2.
Click to expand...
Weisman's dirty tricks are all over the report. The process crimes were the hammer on securing the narrative.
I wonder who thought up the brilliant 'obstruction without an obstruction' Volume II ?
It kept the impeachment train alive
 
dukkha said:
in your dreams..
it was $1.5 billion PAID MONEY election not to mention all the free coverage,and you are gonna claim FB bots
changed votes?? ROFLa meeting is not collusion -even Mueller agrees
Click to expand...

All Mueller concluded was that there was nothing that constituted criminal conspiracy. Collusion is not a crime, though colluding with a foreign power to influence an American election should be criminal.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
dukkha said:
Weisman's dirty tricks are all over the report. The process crimes were the hammer on securing the narrative.
I wonder who thought up the brilliant 'obstruction without an obstruction' Volume II ?
It kept the impeachment train alive
Click to expand...
Purest denial, as usual.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
dukkha said:
Weisman's dirty tricks are all over the report. The process crimes were the hammer on securing the narrative.
I wonder who thought up the brilliant 'obstruction without an obstruction' Volume II ?
It kept the impeachment train alive
Click to expand...

I'm likening the House investigation to the old adage "if a tree falls in the woods ..."
Nadler says he's pressing forward on McGahn's subpoena, and all I can think to say, is "AND"? Tune in for the hearing, for ANOTHER recital of excerpts from an inconclusive report? Why would I do that for God's sake? Why would anyone do that? Nadler's target audience must be his democratic colleagues in the House of reps. who aren't willing to forfeit their seats in pursuit of a noble gesture. If the House passes Articles of impeachment, they should spare America the agony of more inane hearings and hand their referral straight to McConnell. Mitch can run them through the office shredder and save us all the misery of the DNC's incessant whining.
 
PoliticallyMotivated said:
I'm likening the House investigation to the old adage "if a tree falls in the woods ..."
Nadler says he's pressing forward on McGahn's subpoena, and all I can think to say, is "AND"? Tune in for the hearing, for ANOTHER recital of excerpts from an inconclusive report? Why would I do that for God's sake? Why would anyone do that? Nadler's target audience must be his democratic colleagues in the House of reps. who aren't willing to forfeit their seats in pursuit of a noble gesture. If the House passes Articles of impeachment, they should spare America the agony of more inane hearings and hand their referral straight to McConnell. Mitch can run them through the office shredder and save us all the misery of the DNC's incessant whining.
Click to expand...
they are stuck on stupid, because they have NOTHING DONE to show for their term.
In fact they have obstructed things like border security,and asylum law reform. they are hot air
 
dukkha said:
they are stuck on stupid, because they have NOTHING DONE to show for their term.
In fact they have obstructed things like border security,and asylum law reform. they are hot air
Click to expand...

If this disaster is all they have to run on, 2020 will not be kind to Democrats.
 
Moore also said that Trump would win in 2016...and 2020.

There is no "Office of Exoneration."
 
Micawber said:
Can't unring the bell. Genie is out of the bottle.

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who asked if the reason Mueller did not indict the president was because of a Justice Department policy memo by the Office of Legal Counsel that bars indictment of a sitting president.
“That is correct,” Mueller answered.
Click to expand...

You know he later corrected that statement
 
rjhenn said:
The usual wishful thinking. What's clear is that Mueller didn't exonerate Trump.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Correct. Notwithstanding all of the hand wringing by Liberal media outlets, the hearings were meant to do one thing...discredit the Barr version of events.

The hearings did that in spades. Anything else that was expected was simply wishful thinking, and unnecessary.
 
Althea said:
Correct. Notwithstanding all of the hand wringing by Liberal media outlets, the hearings were meant to do one thing...discredit the Barr version of events.

The hearings did that in spades. Anything else that was expected was simply wishful thinking, and unnecessary.
Click to expand...

It did nothing of the sort, the Mueller investigation was not designed to exonerate, it was a political stunt by democrats run by Wiesman with Mueller as the figure head to discredit Trump, it blew up in your face when they found no evidence to Charge him with Obstruction!
 
Wolverine said:
It did nothing of the sort, the Mueller investigation was not designed to exonerate, it was a political stunt by democrats run by Wiesman with Mueller as the figure head to discredit Trump, it blew up in your face when they found no evidence to Charge him with Obstruction!
Click to expand...
Indeed...spot on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top