Another radicalized right wing terrorist strikes again. Gilroy Garlic Festival.

190729-yearbook-photo-santino-legan-mn-1335_6f0198f0e1be6d2e4b595d055ddd12a7.fit-360w.jpg
 
Cypress said:
He bought his AK-47 assault rifle legally in Nevada, and there is some preliminary reporting that there is White Nationalist garbage on his social media.

There is no point jumping to conclusions, but I see no reason that citizens need to have access to AK-47s which are not a hunting weapon and are a subpar choice for defending home and property.
Click to expand...

Yes, it has been reported he bought it in Nevada legally, just as it's been reported he hated Christians and Democracy and he wasn't white. It's also been reported, like many (not every) who have used semi-auto rifles in their carnage, he was a millennial. Which (again) raises the question of why, when I took my (as many of my friends did) hunting rifles to school, we never did stupid shit like these kids are doing. And, it was far easier to get guns back then.

I'm no big fan of the AK-47, not even the AR-15 (although there were some who used the AR-15 in hi-power rifle competitions). My preferences are my M1-A or my tried and true M-1 Garand, both actual military issued weapons, both having superior down-range energy and firing a larger dia. projectile.
Would I use either as a home defense weapon? Not really, I prefer my single action Ruger Blackhawk in .45 LC, but that's me.

OK, so we ban these evil "assault" rifles you have no understanding of (yep, the Ruger 10-22, with a few easily obtained cosmetic modifications look just like an "assault weapon") and these kids just choose another weapon, where does it end? Semi-auto handguns? Semi-auto shotguns? My extremely accurate long-range hunting rifles?
You see some of these kids (and irresponsible adults) screaming gun control, but why can't these same kids pay more attention to their fellow kids? After all, kids see more of themselves (and their social media) than adults do, for the most part. Don't they bear some of the responsibility themselves, rather than my M1-A?
 
StoneByStone said:
So I'm obviously not going to go through every single one of these, but I will debunk some of them.



This was when the Democrats were conservative and the Republicans were liberal. The party switch happened after.



The Nazis were definitely right-wing. They called themselves "Socialist" in order to appeal to Leftists, but they were about as Socialist as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is democratic or a republic.



Kaczynski hated Leftists and said that "a movement that exalts nature and opposes technology must take a resolutely anti-leftist stance and must avoid all collaboration with leftists" and "leftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology."



The DC snipers were apolitical and in no way motivated by politics. I know you think all black people are Liberals, but that's not how it works.

So yeah, I'm not going to bother researching the rest of your examples, because it's clear that you don't have any credibility here.

And yes, there are Leftists who commit acts of terrorism. But it is WAY more common on the Right.
Click to expand...

:laugh: That is what I would say in the face of Facts, when I just had my arse handed to me!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top