Socialists throwing liquids on police officers- milkshakes, water, cement, p*ss, acid

Most guns used in gun crimes came from "responsible gun owners".

In fact, over 100,000 guns every year are stolen from "responsible gun owners", and 10,000 of those thefts aren't even reported to the police.

So "responsible gun owners" are so irresponsible that they have their guns stolen, and then are so irresponsible they don't even report that theft to the cops.

So "Responsible gun owners" buy guns to protect their homes and cars from criminals armed with guns they stole from homes and cars.

It's a cynical and cyclical scam to enrich gun manufacturers and retailers.

Are you actually trying to argue that criminals want to enrich gun manufactures and retailers??? :laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
Cops and Federal Air Marshals ARE licensed carriers.

Air Masrhals are hired to be on the plane. There is no guarantee that a civilian, trained , or not trained, in passenger compartment airplane combat tactics, will be on board.

No, I haven't seen the comparison stats. I assume both groups are background checked.

So am I. I am a citizen of the United States and of the State of Washington.
 
Most of the guns criminals use come from people who posture that they're "responsible gun owners", and 10% of those people don't even tell the cops when one of their guns is stolen.

I don't believe anyone should own firearms, period.

You don't get that choice. You are not the king.
 
you're assuming things that are not in evidence. You're also dismissing the belief of the founders that guns in the hands of the people were a guarantee of freedom. Fear is not involved anywhere. In fact, I'm not afraid because I do carry a gun. That gun protects my freedom and the freedom of those around me.

Bingo.
 
you're assuming things that are not in evidence

Well, why else would you tie your freedom to guns if not because of an overriding fear?


You're also dismissing the belief of the founders that guns in the hands of the people were a guarantee of freedom.

Yeah, that was way back in the 18th century, before first responders, before the standing military, before State National Guards, before the FBI, before Homeland Security.

A gun does not make you free; in fact, it makes you less free because you become a slave to fear.


Fear is not involved anywhere.

It's all about fear..."fear" of "losing your freedom".

Basically, you are just looking for a reason to shoot cops.

So much for "Blue Lives Matter", eh?


In fact, I'm not afraid because I do carry a gun.

So without a gun, you would be afraid. So how is what I'm saying inaccurate or a mischaracterization. You just said right here that a gun makes you unafraid. So that means you are afraid without a gun.


That gun protects my freedom and the freedom of those around me.

How does it do that?
 
Most of the guns criminals use come from people who posture that they're "responsible gun owners", and 10% of those people don't even tell the cops when one of their guns is stolen.

I don't believe anyone should own firearms, period.

Absurdly impractical. :palm:

You're not going to disarm the whole world. That is an unrealistic libtopian fantasy.
 
armed government enforcement agents are not licensed carriers. they are allowed to carry sidearms for their protection in the performance of their duties. The training that they go through is sometimes less than what serious citizens do on their own time. The reason we require government agents to be trained is because we the people require at least a minimum of competence for the extraordinary power they are given. you continue to act like they are superheros.
so now you're on board with background checks to exercise fundamental rights?

Superheroes? :palm: Supervised paid professionals.

Your philosophical interpretation of 2A is so extreme that it is impractically absurd, and would allow anyone to own a machine gun without a background check.
 
Well, why else would you tie your freedom to guns if not because of an overriding fear?
its called being prepared.

Yeah, that was way back in the 18th century, before first responders, before the standing military, before State National Guards, before the FBI, before Homeland Security.
the founding fathers feared a standing army, they were the bane to liberty. todays police, FBI, and homeland security is the standing army they warned us about.

A gun does not make you free; in fact, it makes you less free because you become a slave to fear.
without a gun, you're a slave. someone/government can force you to do something against your will with their gun and you have no way to fight back. If I have my own gun, you're forced to negotiate with me or face death.

It's all about fear..."fear" of "losing your freedom".
you're projecting your own fear

Basically, you are just looking for a reason to shoot cops.
if needs be

So much for "Blue Lives Matter", eh?
if you had a brain, you'd know better

So without a gun, you would be afraid. So how is what I'm saying inaccurate or a mischaracterization. You just said right here that a gun makes you unafraid. So that means you are afraid without a gun.
anyone who isn't is ignorant, naive, or just plain stupid.

How does it do that?
read above
 
Superheroes? :palm: Supervised paid professionals.
supervised????/ ROFL, hardly. todays law enforcement is a slave masters force unto itself. the legal protections alone makes them near untouchable. and forget about professional. i've met some of the most egotistical panty waisted cops ever simply because they didn't like civilians open carrying. so much so, that they've harassed, tasered, and arrested us.

Your philosophical interpretation of 2A is so extreme that it is impractically absurd, and would allow anyone to own a machine gun without a background check.

the way the framers intended, true freedom
 
Your "freedom" is not contingent on you owning a gun.

In fact, by saying you need a gun to protect yourself, you're admitting you're not free at all; you're not free of fear.

Go easy on him. This idiot thinks vehicles are not needed in modern society because they are not mentioned in the Bill of Rights.
 
you really have issues with whole sentences, concepts, theories, and anything else that you can't read in one syllable words, don't you? you know damn well you're lying.

:lolup:

There have been many challengers, but none successful to usurp “vehicles cannot be necessary” as the stupidest forum post ever. :rofl2:
 
supervised????/ ROFL, hardly. todays law enforcement is a slave masters force unto itself. the legal protections alone makes them near untouchable. and forget about professional. i've met some of the most egotistical panty waisted cops ever simply because they didn't like civilians open carrying. so much so, that they've harassed, tasered, and arrested us.

the way the framers intended, true freedom

I don't bout it.
 
Last edited:
supervised????/ ROFL, hardly. todays law enforcement is a slave masters force unto itself. the legal protections alone makes them near untouchable. and forget about professional. i've met some of the most egotistical panty waisted cops ever simply because they didn't like civilians open carrying. so much so, that they've harassed, tasered, and arrested us.



the way the framers intended, true freedom

All cops are bastards, when I see a cop grave I want to take a leak
 
Back
Top