500,000 kids could lose lunch due to trump

Pay Social Security on all income

So when one person pays in 1000 times more than another over a lifetime, you're OK with the former receiving a 1000 times greater distribution?

You do realize you can go on the SS website and run some numbers to show it's not being done that way now?
 
So when one person pays in 1000 times more than another over a lifetime, you're OK with the former receiving a 1000 times greater distribution?

You do realize you can go on the SS website and run some numbers to show it's not being done that way now?

I have an issue with a million dollar a year salary,paying only on $100000
 
Being wasted is based on whether or not it's being used for the intended purpose not on the belief of those receiving it.

Whether SS/Medicare provide more or less than paid in depends on several factors.

Not once did I make such an implication. I don't care whether they become responsible or not as long as the taxpayers that have been forced to feed their damn kids are no longer forced to do so. Whether they remained irresponsible or changed their ways wouldn't be an issue.

If poor parents use the school lunches or foodstamps to feed their kids that is the intended purpose (so it is not being wasted according to your post), but we are still being forced to feed their kids.
 
Social Security and Medicare are self-solving problems. The boomers are already dying off and in a decade or so that problem will be gone. Social Security is paid for by checks of workers. If it falls short, it cuts back on the checks. When it was written, it made it clear that the fed could not take money from other sources to make up for shortages.

It is not self-solving because even after the boomers are gone the 65+ population will continue to increase by 50 million by 2060. The money might not be taken from other sources to make up for shortages, but politically Congress will not allow major benefit cuts and will increase taxes or make some other adjustment.
 
My decision to vote for someone does not have Skin Color, Gender, Religious, Age, or Sexual Orientation requirements. I am not even sure who I am voting for yet.

I'm sure there will be a lot fewer to choose from by the time the primaries and caucuses begin.
 
Says the BOY that did, but continues to lie about, why he voted for Obama. Pucker up, nl.

You are certainly stupid, so you can't be a Russian Bot!

I thought maybe you are- but No!

I have figured out that you are just one of Trump's Stupid People that he was referring to when he said, "I love Stupid People"! .
 
If poor parents use the school lunches or foodstamps to feed their kids that is the intended purpose (so it is not being wasted according to your post), but we are still being forced to feed their kids.

You're the one that said many schools spend the money and no one used the programs.

The parents should be feeding their own kids instead of being irresponsible leeches. When are those that support such programs going to learn that someone so irresponsible they won't feed their own kids aren't going to change unless the enabling stops.
 
I voted for Obama so you would stew in your own shit for 8 years! LOL!

You failed. Unlike you, although Obama was a piece of shit by product of a typical runaway black baby daddy and white trash mother, I didn't stew because my side didn't win.

You voted Obama because you're a left wing nl.
 
You failed. Unlike you, although Obama was a piece of shit by product of a typical runaway black baby daddy and white trash mother, I didn't stew because my side didn't win.

Right!

tenor.gif
 
You're the one that said many schools spend the money and no one used the programs.

The parents should be feeding their own kids instead of being irresponsible leeches. When are those that support such programs going to learn that someone so irresponsible they won't feed their own kids aren't going to change unless the enabling stops.

Yes, that was an example from school districts in my area. The other is a hypothetical that IF parents spend the money as intended, do you still oppose those programs?
 
If poor parents use the school lunches or foodstamps to feed their kids that is the intended purpose (so it is not being wasted according to your post), but we are still being forced to feed their kids.

You could be happy that your taxes are helping poor children eat instead of bitching about it. Every government program is not designed to specifically help you.
 
Back
Top