500,000 kids could lose lunch due to trump

[Phantasmal]

SNAP is almost 50% funded by FEDERAL money, it is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A FEDERAL AGENCY! Pull your head out of your ass! Whatever happened to your “big government is the answer to everything” bullshit?

It’s not the answer to everything, but hungry children need to be fed and it’s too big a job for charity. It is no fault of the children the circumstances in which they live. We need to feed the children. It is the humane thing to do.

 

[Judy Johnstone]

When you throw money at a behavior, you will get more of it.

Guar-on-teed

You going to feed the kids,yes or no

 

[Judy Johnstone]

It’s not the answer to everything, but hungry children need to be fed and it’s too big a job for charity. It is no fault of the children the circumstances in which they live. We need to feed the children. It is the humane thing to do.

Just not the Republican "thing to do"!

 

[Judy Johnstone]

There we’re past reports in the news where children were shamed and not allowed to eat lunch

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.democratandchronicle.com/amp/1012590001

https://www.google.com/amp/s/civile...from-being-shamed-over-school-lunch-debt/amp/

What kind of people justify letting kids go hungry in this country!

 

[Earl]

It’s not the answer to everything, but hungry children need to be fed and it’s too big a job for charity. It is no fault of the children the circumstances in which they live. We need to feed the children. It is the humane thing to do.

Yes, hungry children should be fed, by THEIR own parents,

Feed your own children, sock. Don’t expect other parents to feed your children.

They will be fed, by the taxpayers...some of whom don’t even have children.

 

[Life is Golden]

You going to feed the kids,yes or no

If you throw money at a behavior, you get more of it.

Let that sink in a minute before deflecting.

Remember, when you deflect, you lose.

 

[Earl]

What kind of people justify letting kids go hungry in this country!

What kind of people want taxpayers to pay for children of other parents.

If you can’t feed your children, don’t have children.

They will be fed but excusing the parents who have children that they can not feed is atrocious, sock.

 

[Judy Johnstone]

If you throw money at a behavior, you get more of it.

Let that sink in a minute before deflecting.

Remember, when you deflect, you lose.

So that's a no,you will let the kids go hungry.

 

[Judy Johnstone]

What kind of people want taxpayers to pay for children of other parents.

If you can’t feed your children, don’t have children.

They will be fed but excusing the parents who have children that they can not feed is atrocious, sock.

So that's a no ,you'll let the kids go hungry.

 

[Life is Golden]

So that's a no ,you'll let the kids go hungry.

When you deflect, you lose.

I accept your concession.

Throw money at a behavior, you get more of it. Fact.

 

[Earl]

If you throw money at a behavior, you get more of it.

Let that sink in a minute before deflecting.

Remember, when you deflect, you lose.

Indeed.

I know no one who doesn’t want hungry children fed. Our Catholic Charities feed them every day.

The sock and others like him never mention the obligation of parents to provide sustenance for the children that they have.

Should parents who have no children pay for others who have children that they can’t or won’t feed?

Should parents who struggle and sacrifice to feed their own children, subsidize those irresponsible parents?

 

[CFM]

So that's a yes,you'll let the kid starve.

Their parents would be letting them starve.

 

[CFM]

When you deflect, you lose.

I accept your concession.

Throw money at a behavior, you get more of it. Fact.

Maybe Sox the sock thinks enabling those parents to be freeloaders will magically stop them from being freeloaders.

 

[CFM]

So that's a no ,you'll let the kids go hungry.

Only if it's your kids.

 

[Earl]

So that's a no ,you'll let the kids go hungry.

I just posted that I know no one who doesn’t want hungry children fed, sock.

Feed your own though, I fed mine.

I thought you had me on “ignore” sock.

Did you lie...again?

 

[Earl]

Perfect example of a Conservative,anti-abortion,but once the kid is here let them starve

You lie, sock. He did NOT say that.

Here is what CFM did say.

“Show me where the Constitution says, specifically, that it's the responsibility of those of us that aren't a kid's parents to feed him/her because his/her own parents won't do their job.”

Please respond to this, sock

 

[Judy Johnstone]

When you deflect, you lose.

I accept your concession.

Throw money at a behavior, you get more of it. Fact.

So that no,let the kids go hungry

 

[Judy Johnstone]

You lie, sock. He did NOT say that.

Here is what CFM did say.

“Show me where the Constitution says, specifically, that it's the responsibility of those of us that aren't a kid's parents to feed him/her because his/her own parents won't do their job.”

Please respond to this, sock

So CFM says the Constitution says,let the kids go hungry

 

[Earl]

So CFM says the Constitution says,let the kids go hungry

It says what it says, sock.

Why are you using a sock, sock?

 

[domer76]

You lie, sock. He did NOT say that.

Here is what CFM did say.

“Show me where the Constitution says, specifically, that it's the responsibility of those of us that aren't a kid's parents to feed him/her because his/her own parents won't do their job.”

Please respond to this, sock

The always ignorant “show me where the Constitution says”. Always good for a laugh.