Did Russian Interference Affect the 2016 Election Results?

Muh Russian collusion!!! It's still real to me dammit!
Google affected the election more than Russia, and still couldn't beat the counter culture. Trump doesn't represent the people who put him there, but he was closer to what they wanted than Hillary was so they gave him a shot. He's done a few things right but he also continued some of the left wing agenda and Israel agenda. I would vote for someone better, but the democrats mostly field shit candidates. Tulsi is the only one who made any sense to me.
 
LV426 said:
Because this isn't bothsiderism.
Click to expand...

You said the Republicans cheat. The implication is that Democrats don't which is an outright lie.

It is bothsiderism if you think only one side engages in such conduct. Look at the database I posted with over 1,000 examples of documented voter fraud.

You are like the parent who thinks their little kid does nothing wrong.
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
I would have loved to be able to prove my point- had the three states mentioned performed a paper ballot recount.

But, the Republican governors of those states refused to do the recount in 2016- raising even more suspicion of manipulations and cheating!

If you don't have anything to hide- YOU RECOUNT!
Click to expand...

You don't recount unless you have some evidence the count is not accurate. We are being told Russian interference influenced people to change their votes. Now you are saying the ballots were interfered with.

Who called for a recount in those states?
 
tinfoil said:
Muh Russian collusion!!! It's still real to me dammit!
Google affected the election more than Russia, and still couldn't beat the counter culture. Trump doesn't represent the people who put him there, but he was closer to what they wanted than Hillary was so they gave him a shot. He's done a few things right but he also continued some of the left wing agenda and Israel agenda. I would vote for someone better, but the democrats mostly field shit candidates. Tulsi is the only one who made any sense to me.
Click to expand...

Tulsi is exquisitely sensible on foreign policy but she’d give you more leftism than Trump.

Good point about Google: Google’s resources are unmatched across the globe and they were in the tank for Hillary and anti-Trump.

The Russians? Really lol?
 
LV426 said:
No. Mueller is distinguished...you're a garbage troll on the internet.

You can take your Federalist propaganda site, and shove it.

You didn't even read Mueller's report; that's how much of a coward you are.
Click to expand...

Mullet may have been distinguished at one point but his disastrous appearance before Congress changed all of that. Except perhaps for True Believers such as yourself lol.

Mullet didn’t even know what was in ‘his’ report. Astoundingly, he didn’t know what Fusion GPS was.

You get on others for not reading Mullet’s report when Mullet didn’t even read the damn thing.
 
Listen, dumbasses- Trump is shoveling ' anti-Semitism ' shit for votes, just like the Conservatives are doing in the UK and all other right-wing assholes throughout Europe. ' Anti-Semitism ' , A.K.A. Izrael- is a political ploy. Having Izrael's right-wing stand up in your support by whining false claims of ' anti-Semitism ' is one way of influencing the MASSES of brain-washed voters to vote your way.
How you can be so dumb as to ignore Izrael's interference - over 20 standing ovations in Congress for the fascist, Nretanyahu, for example- is an indicator of just how dumb you are. In general it isn't your fault- you've been subjected to the false Izraeli narrative ever since you could read.

In order to place the US in direct conflict with Iran- Izrael's regional opposition- the Izraelis needed the likes of Obama gone and a prosemitic sap in the White House. They managed it. You're on the brink of war.

How many standing ovations did Putin get in Congress ? Haw, haw..............................haw.
 
Darth Omar said:
Mullet may have been distinguished at one point but his disastrous appearance before Congress changed all of that. Except perhaps for True Believers such as yourself lol.

Mullet didn’t even know what was in ‘his’ report. Astoundingly, he didn’t know what Fusion GPS was.

You get on others for not reading Mullet’s report when Mullet didn’t even read the damn thing.
Click to expand...
Mullet is riddled with unsupported claim s of Russian interference, and redactions like the Dowd phone call where redacting mad him look like obstructing
 
dukkha said:
unbelievable retarded..this from the moron who ran around screaming "Russian collusion"

from day 1 I said collusion/conspiracy was a stupid premise - it would require Putin to aid Trump still not knowing he would win when every indication was Hillary was going to win

you have NO ROOM TO WIGGLE OR CONDEMN OTHERS WHEN YOU BOUGHT INTO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
Click to expand...

You are such a lying asshole.
You've been caught, take it like a man.
 
LV426 said:
This is true.

Dukka/Anatta/1000 other ID's was saying for two years that Russia didn't hack anything.

Over and over and over he said that.

Now, he's saying "OK they did hack, bUt ThEy DiDn'T cHaNgE AnYtHiNg" after being wrong about them hacking for two years straight.

So since he was wrong about there even being a hack, why would he suddenly be right about nothing changing as a result of that hack?

He has no credibility, and piss poor judgment.
Click to expand...

Post of the month award.
The lying bitch also claimed that he could do his taxes on a post card and that taxes would drop for the middle class.
He lies with no shame.
 
Rune said:
Post of the month award.
The lying bitch also claimed that he could do his taxes on a post card and that taxes would drop for the middle class.
He lies with no shame.
Click to expand...
ROFL . I can do my taxes on a postcard ( you don't understand that was a reference to simplification w/ no deduction), and taxes did drop for middle class.

Unless you were in a SALT state, like yourself- too bad
 
dukkha said:
unbelievable retarded..this from the moron who ran around screaming "Russian collusion"
Click to expand...

1. You said for two years straight that Russia didn't hack anything. You're only now saying Russia did hack because the evidence laid out in the Mueller report is indisputable.

2. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why Manafort shared polling data from the same states Trump narrowly won, and which were targeted by the IRA and Russian propagandists, with Kilimnik for months when he was campaign manager.

3. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why the Republican Party changed its platform at the 2016 RNC to be more pro-Russia.

4. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why Trump ordered his son to lie about the reason for the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with known Russian spies.
 
dukkha said:
from day 1 I said collusion/conspiracy was a stupid premise -
Click to expand...

No, from day one you said Russia didn't hack anything.

Then you changed that once the evidence of their hack became indisputable.

Now you're saying that they did hack, but didn't conspire with Trump or the GOP to do so, but you can't really say that because you can't explain:

a) The inconvenient event of the GOP changing their platform to be pro-Russia at the 2016 RNC
b) Why Trump ordered his son to lie about the reasons for the 2016 June Trump Tower meeting
c) Why Manafort was sharing polling data with Kilimnik for months when he was campaign manager.

So you keep changing what it is you say is true, and you do it because you're a pathetic troll on the internet who realized you have to carry Trump's baggage now and forever. That's why you keep creating new IDs...you hate being held to account for all the dumb, stupid things you say here that end up being wrong.
 
LV426 said:
1. You said for two years straight that Russia didn't hack anything. You're only now saying Russia did hack because the evidence laid out in the Mueller report is indisputable.
Click to expand...
it's disputable -it's wrong. both the charges against Kilimnik and the redactions of the Dowd phone call to imply obstruction a incorrect

LV426 said:
2. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why Manafort shared polling data from the same states Trump narrowly won, and which were targeted by the IRA and Russian propagandists, with Kilimnik for months when he was campaign manager.
Click to expand...
I need not provide an alternate explanation. I only have to show Mueller was skipping the fact Kilimnik was a known US State Dept asset. Mueller had the source doc to know he was a US asset as well


LV426 said:
3. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why the Republican Party changed its platform at the 2016 RNC to be more pro-Russia.
Click to expand...
they did NOT change their platform - you are so freaking brain dead i'v e given you links and you conveniently forget them the next day

What really happened with the GOP platform and Russia
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-what-really-happened-with-the-gop-platform-and-russia
4. You say there's no collusion, yet you cannot offer a credible explanation for why Trump ordered his son to lie about the reason for the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with known Russian spies.
Click to expand...
Mueller said that was not collusion, that's all that matters
 
anatta said:
it's disputable -it's wrong. both the charges against Kilimnik and the redactions of the Dowd phone call to imply obstruction a incorrect

I need not provide an alternate explanation. I only have to show Mueller was skipping the fact Kilimnik was a known US State Dept asset. Mueller had the source doc to know he was a US asset as well


they did NOT change their platform - you are so freaking brain dead i'v e given you links and you conveniently forget them the next day

What really happened with the GOP platform and Russia
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-what-really-happened-with-the-gop-platform-and-russia
Mueller said that was not collusion, that's all that matters
Click to expand...

shut the fuck gasbag.....Washington Examiner lol

go eat your borscht asshole
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top